Icinga vs InfluxDB comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Icinga and InfluxData are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #42, while InfluxData is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1. Icinga holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to InfluxData’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,642 Views
5,579 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

7,775 Views
2,255 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Icinga

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

```html

InfluxDB and Icinga are both in the data monitoring and analytics category. InfluxDB has an edge in data query performance and precision, while Icinga stands out in monitoring and alert capabilities, important for system health maintenance.

Features: InfluxDB focuses on high-speed data ingestion, enabling extensive querying for real-time analytics. Its time-series database management is suited for large datasets. Icinga provides detailed system health monitoring and efficient alert mechanisms, aiming for reliable system availability. Each offers distinct but complementary core functionalities.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could improve its initial setup complexity and further diversify its query functions to enhance user experience. It may also look into offering more extensive historical data analysis options. Icinga might benefit from expanding its integration capabilities with other systems, simplifying its user interface, and enhancing its scalability options for broader deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga's deployment is versatile, supporting various operating systems, supported by a strong community for implementation guidance. InfluxDB offers cloud deployment options allowing quick scalability of data architecture, known for its less complicated configuration, facilitating an easier setup process.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB offers a scalable pricing model fitting its cloud infrastructure, providing ROI through data processing capabilities, despite higher initial setup costs. Icinga's cost structure, often predictable, uses an open-source model which can reduce expenses significantly, favored by organizations focusing on monitoring tasks.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. InfluxDB

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

42nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

49th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (15th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.5%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We monitor all, starting from UPS to international mail chains."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

"The most valuable feature is one that not many are even aware of, as Icinga has a self-healing event handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted, and you can configure the handler to take action after the critical alarm without human interaction."

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

More Icinga pros

"InfluxDB's best feature is that it's a cloud offering. Other good features include its time-series DB, fast time-bulk queries, and window operations."

"InfluxDB has positively impacted Energy Box by being the best choice for our needs."

"As a time series database, it is very powerful and lightweight, and it can deal with heavy workloads very easily."

"InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data from servers. It must be installed on Windows or Linux servers. During installation, ensure that the configuration file is correct to prevent issues. Once data is collected, it can be sent to InfluxDB. For visualization, you can use open-source tools like Grafana."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"Prior to InfluxDB usage, real-time data was not visualized and monitored, and after the introduction of InfluxDB in the entire framework, the organization is benefiting a lot in terms of monitoring and understanding performance data in real-time."

More InfluxDB pros

Cons

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"Scalability is problematic. If you have a stable environment it's good, but if the environment is growing, I had some problems with Icinga."

"Sometimes, it is very hard to keep an overview of what's happening."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

More Icinga cons

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"I chose an 8 out of 10 because there is room for improvement, such as regarding backups and enhanced security through other types of authentication or encrypted data in TLS."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"However, I cannot ignore the challenges I faced while configuring the database with my message brokers, whether Rabbit or Kafka, because the documentation is not properly provided."

"Sometimes, when we write too much data within a minute, the data count becomes excessive, reaching perhaps 100,000 or 500,000 data points, and InfluxDB gives a timeout exception, which we must handle in our application."

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"Customer support is fair enough but can be improved."

More InfluxDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"The solution is cheap."

"It's an open-source solution."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is free to use."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

September 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

September 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. InfluxDB

September 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.