

Datadog and InfluxDB are leading contenders in the field of monitoring and analytics, each bringing unique strengths to the table. Datadog appears advantageous due to its extensive integrations and user-friendly interface, which facilitate comprehensive monitoring with minimal setup.
Features: Datadog offers a robust set of features, including customizable dashboards that cater to diverse monitoring needs. Its SaaS-based model relieves users from infrastructure management responsibilities. Additionally, the platform's integration ecosystem is vast and vetted, ensuring seamless connections with major services like AWS, Docker, and Splunk. InfluxDB shines with its high throughput time-series data handling, which is vital for latency-sensitive platforms. Its open-source model provides flexibility and cost-effectiveness for users skilled in managing infrastructure.
Room for Improvement: Datadog's pricing model could be more transparent, and users suggest more robust AI-driven insights. Enhancements in query language intuitiveness are also recommended. InfluxDB could bolster its backup and high availability capabilities, as these are crucial for disaster recovery. Further improvements in its user interface and advanced querying features are desired to enhance user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog's versatility is evident in its support for public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering broad compatibility across infrastructures. Its customer service is proactive, although response times for complex queries could be quicker. InfluxDB caters to users preferring on-premises control, particularly benefiting from its open-source framework. The reliability of its customer support is a noted strength, delivering timely and detailed assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Datadog is considered a premium option, with a complex pricing structure that may lead to unexpected costs. Despite this, significant ROI is reported through enhanced efficiency and reduced downtime. In contrast, InfluxDB's open-source nature initially offers a cost advantage, though scaling can entail extra charges. Its ROI is primarily derived from efficient data handling, appealing to businesses that maximize its open-source potential.
Previously we had thirteen contractors doing the monitoring for us, which is now reduced to only five.
Datadog has delivered more than its value through reduced downtime, faster recovery, and infrastructure optimization.
I believe features that would provide a lot of time savings, just enabling you to really narrow down and filter the type of frustration or user interaction that you're looking for.
InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.
Time saved is there, as I mentioned, because we have an analytics system from where we get alerting and monitoring.
When I have additional questions, the ticket is updated with actual recommendations or suggestions pointing me in the correct direction.
Overall, the entire Datadog comprehensive experience of support, onboarding, getting everything in there, and having a good line of feedback has been exceptional.
I've had a couple instances where I reached out to Datadog's support team, and they have been really super helpful and very kind, even reaching back out after resolving my issues to check if everything's going well.
Datadog's scalability has been great as it has been able to grow with our needs.
We did, as a trial, engage the AWS integration, and immediately it found all of our AWS resources and presented them to us.
Datadog's scalability is strong; we've continued to significantly grow our software, and there are processes in place to ensure that as new servers, realms, and environments are introduced, we're able to include them all in Datadog without noticing any performance issues.
The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.
We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.
InfluxDB's scalability is fine for me; I gather a lot of metrics and have not had any issues.
Datadog is very stable, as there hasn't been any downtime or issues since I've been here, and it's always on time.
Datadog seems stable in my experience without any downtime or reliability issues.
Datadog seems to be more stable, and I really want to have a complete demo before making a call to decide on this.
It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.
It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.
After integrating Kafka, it never broke again, as Kafka handled messages and metrics appropriately, decreasing the message throughput.
It would be great to see stronger AI-driven anomaly detection and predictive analytics to help identify potential issues before they impact performance.
We want to be able to customize the cost part, and we would appreciate more granular access control.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.
Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.
It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
Everybody wants the agent installed, but we only have so many dollars to spread across, so it's been difficult for me to prioritize who will benefit from Datadog at this time.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is really expensive.
We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for InfluxDB was great, as I did not use any license.
We are using an open-source solution, so there is no cost on that.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
Having all that associated analytics helps me in troubleshooting by not having to bounce around to other tools, which saves me a lot of time.
Datadog was able to find the alerts and trigger to notify our team in a very prompt manner before it got worse, allowing us to promptly adjust and remediate the situation in time.
The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.
InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.
It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Datadog | 2.4% |
| InfluxDB | 0.3% |
| Other | 97.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 80 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 46 |
| Large Enterprise | 99 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.
Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.
What are Datadog's Key Features?In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.
InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.
InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.
InfluxDB offers its users:
InfluxDB Benefits
There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.
Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.