InfluxDB vs Zabbix comparison

Read 109 Zabbix reviews

32,343 Views
19,082 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Zabbix and InfluxDB compete in the open-source monitoring and data handling category. Zabbix seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive monitoring capabilities and flexibility.

Features: Zabbix offers robust monitoring capabilities featuring low-level discovery, auto-discovery, and advanced templating for a wide range of environments. Its scalability and customization are frequently highlighted in user reviews. InfluxDB is valued for its strong performance in handling time-series data and seamless integration with tools such as Grafana, though it is traditionally focused on data handling rather than monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix can improve its user experience, UI intuitiveness, and automation, with many users requesting better reporting functionalities. InfluxDB faces challenges with high-cardinality data and could enhance its UI, integration capabilities, and develop more built-in features for ease of use across varied environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix is known for its solid on-premises deployment and benefits from strong community support, though direct technical support can be challenging. InfluxDB provides versatile deployment with on-premises and hybrid cloud options, focusing heavily on the integration capabilities that suit diverse setups. It receives less emphasis on structured customer service interactions than Zabbix.

Pricing and ROI: Both Zabbix and InfluxDB provide free versions, effectively lowering initial costs. Zabbix's lack of licensing fees leads to significant ROI for users transitioning from costly commercial solutions. InfluxDB, although free at the start, may see additional costs during scaling due to its recent pricing changes, impacting its cost-efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: June 2026).

Download the complete report

InfluxDB vs. Zabbix

June 2026

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.8

Companies experienced enhanced operational efficiency and increased customer satisfaction with InfluxDB through real-time monitoring and automation.

Sentiment score

7.1

Large enterprises achieve significant ROI with Zabbix, saving millions by reducing costs and enhancing IT management and monitoring.

These improvements translated into both cost savings and better service reliability, directly impacting business outcomes.

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

It simplifies processes and reduces the need for additional employees.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

It has reduced a lot of time in terms of troubleshooting because the way it produces the data on a time-series basis allows me to collect and store the data for future reference.

Gaurav Dangaich

Sdet Performance Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.8

InfluxDB customer support is praised for enterprise-level help but needs faster response times and more complex deployment support.

Sentiment score

6.8

Zabbix offers helpful, responsive technical support, though some prefer community resources or independent handling due to support costs.

They get on a call, resolve issues, and handle everything efficiently.

Manas Kashyap

Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital

The InfluxDB support team was knowledgeable and helped us troubleshoot complex problems efficiently.

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

Obtaining that quantity of data directly from InfluxDB is quite challenging, and that is why we ask for help from the InfluxDB team to retrieve the data to avoid timeouts and those kinds of issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

It is so straightforward that I have never had to use the support.

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

CTO at Oic

I changed the config file by adjusting the connector size and cache size.

İsmailÇETİN

Consultant at ministry of trade

İÇ

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

InfluxDB scales efficiently in enterprises, supports large data volumes, and integrates well, though backup stability varies by deployment.

Sentiment score

6.9

Zabbix is scalable and adaptable for different environments, though it may need resource adjustments and complex setups for optimization.

The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.

Sayak Roy

Deployment Engineer at Derq

It can handle large volumes of time-series data and with high ingestion rates, making it suitable for enterprise-scale deployments.

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Senior System Developer at Norled

Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

CTO at Oic

Zabbix has high scalability.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

I would rate its scalability ten out of ten.

B Ahmed

Manager, Information Technology Zara & Inditex at Cenomi

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

InfluxDB is reliable, stable, and supported, with minor issues resolved by integrations and support, except in Azure China.

Sentiment score

7.4

Zabbix is stable and reliable, with occasional infrastructure-related issues and suggestions for database optimization to maintain performance.

It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.

Senior System Developer at Norled

We have used it to support mission-critical systems with continuous data ingestion and real-time analytics.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.

Btece Lodi

Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.

CTO at Oic

Zabbix is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems with Zabbix itself.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

I think the stability of Zabbix is around five to six on a scale of ten, where ten is the best and one is the worst.

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Room For Improvement

InfluxDB requires improvements in query language, UI, pricing, documentation, scalability, cloud integration, and support for non-technical users.

Zabbix users face issues with false positives, complex setup, limited reporting, high pricing, and desire better cloud integration.

InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.

Milan Predic

Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency

Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Senior System Developer at Norled

It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.

reviewer2778060

Network engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best.

CTO at Oic

I installed Zabbix for the 300 devices.

İsmailÇETİN

Consultant at ministry of trade

The potential and customization is a little difficult because you have to learn scripts.

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

İÇ

Setup Cost

InfluxDB's pricing shift to a monthly model prompts enterprises to consider open-source options for cost-effective scalability and flexibility.

Zabbix offers cost-effective open-source monitoring, recommending investment in support for optimal performance, keeping costs below alternatives like Nagios.

We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.

Senior System Developer at Norled

I find the cloud version pricing of InfluxDB reasonable, and for the on-premises solution we use in our service, we need to purchase licenses.

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Pricing is based on data volume, retention, and features, which really makes it scalable but requires careful planning to avoid unexpected costs.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

Zabbix is providing everything free of cost.

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

It is literally free.

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

CTO at Oic

Valuable Features

InfluxDB excels in fast data writes, analytics, and integration, enhancing efficiency and visualization with robust community support.

Zabbix is valued for its ease, scalability, customization, and robust monitoring capabilities, supported by continual updates and community support.

The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.

Milan Predic

Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency

InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Senior System Developer at Norled

It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.

reviewer2761710

Solutions Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

If disk usage surpasses a threshold, say 70%, I receive alerts and can take proactive action.

For more quotes and insights, download the Zabbix report

CTO at Oic

Zabbix has a lot of features, including monitoring, status updates, and collecting information telemetry from storages and servers as well.

IgorKabish

CTO at Four Nine Agency

Zabbix is Linux-based open-source software, and the main use case is to reduce costs.

SaurabhYadav5

Network Engineer at Ogma Consulting

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), NoSQL Databases (7th)

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Server Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 3.9%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zabbix	3.9%
InfluxDB	0.5%
Other	95.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Helps reduce response time but has room to improve customization complexity

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

We are not working on simple standalone solutions like Kaspersky DDoS Protection or Hybrid Cloud Security. Once you understand Zabbix, then it is easy to customize those web pages and graphs for our customer use. It is fully automated to your requirements. Zabbix is working fine with no issues, and I am satisfied with it. We have combined Zabbix and SolarWinds. The integration works fine, and it is easy to integrate Zabbix with the IT environment. We were trying to purchase MDR (Managed Detection and Response), but we are not working on that. I don't have real experience with MDR. We are using Falcon software for that. We are working with Falcon Complete, not with Sandbox. We are not using Kaspersky for business or cloud protection. For that, we are using Zabbix CrowdStrike Falcon Complete solution. I have given this review an overall rating of 8.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

I think Zabbix is economical, whereas SolarWinds is expensive. SolarWinds has a lot of secure features, but Zabbix is providing everything free of cost. Zabbix is economical, and you can install it...

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

I am using only Area Operations, but I don't prefer it. I installed Zabbix for the 3000 devices. Area Operations is not good.

What is your primary use case for Zabbix?

I am still working with VMware and Area Operations, but I installed Zabbix now. I think Zabbix is better than VMware Area Operations. It's really good. I'm working with both Zabbix and VMware now.

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

Compared 7% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

Redis vs InfluxDB

Compared 3% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Zabbix

Compared 2% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Download InfluxDB product report

InfluxDB

June 2026

Download Zabbix product report

May 2026

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba