Invicti vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition comparison

Invicti and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Invicti is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while PortSwigger is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.6. Invicti holds a 7.8% mindshare in DAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

3,424 Views
753 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Read 12 PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition reviews

2,151 Views
430 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Invicti

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Invicti and PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Container Security (26th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Ente...

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 7.8%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is 4.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Invicti	7.8%
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition	4.3%
Other	87.9%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Oussama Ben Taher

Studiant at Edifixio

Enables time-saving automated scanning and brute force attacks

The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically. Its automated scanning feature saves time. Additionally, using this tool provides significant security insights, making our testing process more efficient and comprehensive, leading to considerable time savings, which in turn translates to financial benefits.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"Its ability to crawl a web application is quite different than another similar scanner."

"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

More Invicti pros

"The most valuable part of it was probably the ability to intercept and modify calls."

"The solution's extensions really expand the capabilities and features offered by the installation."

"This tool helps identify vulnerabilities. We then provide the report to the developers, who address the issues identified automatically. Its most valuable feature is CI/CD integration."

"We are in the early stage of using the solution making it difficult to fully determine the best features. However, we have noticed the CMDB and device discovery features look valuable at this time."

"The product's initial setup phase was super easy."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition."

"The most appreciated functionality of PortSwigger Burp Suite is its ability to perform brute force attacks automatically."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition pros

Cons

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"I think that it freezes without any specific reason at times. This needs to be looked into."

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."

More Invicti cons

"The product needs to have the ability to evaluate more."

"It would be better if the solution is cloud-based."

"The cost per license per user could be cheaper, specifically for individual licensing."

"It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively."

"From my personal experience, the solution's performance could be improved."

"The implementation of the solution is quite complicated and could be easier."

"Scalability could be better."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"Although the solution can be a bit expensive for small companies, its pricing is fairly reasonable for its capabilities."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is expensive compared to other solutions."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and costs around 400 dollars per year."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is neither a cheap nor an expensive product. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is a good tool for companies."

"For Professional, it's about $400 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

Parallel scans can be done with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

I am using the Community Edition, which is free, however, I understand there might be extra expenses for additional features or services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition?

It would be beneficial if Burp Suite provided predefined payloads for each attack category, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, to automate some tasks more effectively.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 2% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Seal Security vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 36% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 10% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Compared 3% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

January 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

January 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

No data available

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is an automated web vulnerability scanner, designed to enable enterprises to scale security across their web portfolios and achieve DevSecOps. Automate trusted Burp scans, integrate web security testing with development, and free your application security to support software development.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Nasa, Disney, Dow Jones, Iberia Bank, IBM, Ernest and Young, Apple, Ryanair, Thyssenkrupp, Delivery Hero

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

December 2025

Free Report: Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.