No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Invicti excels in scanning capabilities and offers a unique crawling feature compared to other similar scanners.
Its scanning process does not heavily impact network resources, allowing seamless operation.
Invicti demonstrates a high level of accuracy and a quick scanning process, making it a reliable tool for vulnerability identification.
The platform integrates effectively with CI/CD pipelines, enhancing proactive vulnerability detection during deployment or code push.
Invicti stands out in reducing false positives and verifying vulnerabilities, significantly improving security testing efficiency.

CONS

Invicti's reporting capabilities require improvement for more comprehensive and user-friendly options.
The higher-level vulnerabilities, such as Cross-Site Scripting and SQL Injection, are challenging to highlight.
Licensing is tied to URLs, which proves costly and restrictive, especially for scanning different domains.
The scanning time is lengthy compared to other DAST tools, which affects usability.
Support, documentation, and multi-factor authentication support need enhancement.
 

Invicti Pros review quotes

Kunal M - PeerSpot reviewer
Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell
Feb 7, 2025
Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment.
JanetMuhia - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Engineer at Spartec
Nov 25, 2024
Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration.
KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Xcelliti
Aug 16, 2024
It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline.
Learn what your peers think about Invicti. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Valavan Sivgalingam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS
Aug 4, 2023
Invicti is a good product, and its API testing is also good.
Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Information Security Analyst at EastNets Holding Ltd.
Aug 14, 2023
The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools.
Berk Onur - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales Consultant at Cyberwise
Sep 16, 2024
I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities.
Vishal Dhamke - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President Application Security North America at BNP Paribas
Jul 29, 2021
The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support.
AO
Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem
May 29, 2024
The platform is stable.
Akshay Waghmare - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Nov 9, 2023
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
JoelGeorge - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate at Tata Consultancy
Apr 25, 2022
It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms.
 

Invicti Cons review quotes

Kunal M - PeerSpot reviewer
Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell
Feb 7, 2025
Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement.
JanetMuhia - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Engineer at Spartec
Nov 25, 2024
Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve.
KashifJamil - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Xcelliti
Aug 16, 2024
They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement
Learn what your peers think about Invicti. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Valavan Sivgalingam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS
Aug 4, 2023
The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved.
Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Information Security Analyst at EastNets Holding Ltd.
Aug 14, 2023
The solution needs to make a more specific report.
Berk Onur - PeerSpot reviewer
Presales Consultant at Cyberwise
Sep 16, 2024
The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning.
Vishal Dhamke - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President Application Security North America at BNP Paribas
Jul 29, 2021
The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support.
AO
Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem
May 29, 2024
They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform.
Akshay Waghmare - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Nov 9, 2023
The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved.
JoelGeorge - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate at Tata Consultancy
Apr 25, 2022
Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product.