Invicti vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Invicti and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7, while PortSwigger is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8. Invicti holds a 1.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 29 Invicti reviews

2,696 Views
1,507 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 63 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

3,806 Views
2,573 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Invicti

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Invicti compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Users prefer Invicti for its extensive features, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is favored for pricing and support satisfaction.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers robust scanning capabilities, flexible testing methodologies, and reliable assessments. Invicti is known for automated scanning, comprehensive reporting functions, and efficiency in its processes.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users suggest improvements in scalability, third-party tool integration, and enhanced UI. Invicti users desire better update notifications, improved scan speed, and a streamlined interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional provides straightforward deployment and consistent customer service, ensuring a smooth start. Invicti offers seamless deployment but faces minor initial configuration and support responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is valued for reasonable setup costs and effective ROI through vulnerability assessments. Invicti is considered pricier but delivers satisfactory ROI due to powerful automated tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.0%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Proactive scanning measures and realistic audit recommendations enhance development focus

Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment. This feature helps us focus on priorities and prioritize the development team's effort, integrating seamlessly with DevOps to facilitate proactive scans of environments. Invicti also provides audit recommendations that are quite realistic, making it easy to discuss plans with developers.

Read full review

Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor

Head - Quality Control at Net Solutions

Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms

We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"High level of accuracy and quick scanning."

"The most attractive feature was the reporting review tool. The reporting review was very impressive and produced very fruitful reports."

"I like that it's stable and technical support is great."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"Attacking feature: Actually, attacking is not a solo feature. It contains many attack engines, Hawk, and many properties. But Netsparker's attacking mechanism is very flexible. This increases the vulnerability detection rate. Also, Netsparker made the Hawk for real-time interactive command-line-based exploit testing. It's very valuable for a vulnerability scanner."

More Invicti pros

"One useful function is the ability to send requests to the repeater without making actual requests through the browser, allowing me to modify requests easily."

"I have found the best features to be the performance and there are a lot of additional plugins available."

"The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately."

"The tool provides complimentary services. It allows you to add a lot of extensions, and you can get extensions quite often. It is quite a flexible application."

"The extension that it provides with the community version for the skills mapping is excellent."

"For pentesting scenarios, this is the number one tool. It can capture the request, and there are so many functions that are very good for that. For example, a black box satellite host."

"I rate PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional ten points out of ten."

"The Repeater and the BApp extensions are particularly useful. Certain extensions, such as the Active Scan extensions and the Autoracer extension, are very good."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement."

"I think that it freezes without any specific reason at times. This needs to be looked into."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

More Invicti cons

"The solution doesn't offer very good scalability."

"The price could be better. The rest is fine."

"In the Professional version, we cannot link it with the CI/CD process."

"Improvement should be done as per the requirements of customers."

"If your application uses multi-factor authentication, registration management cannot be automated."

"The Initial setup is a bit complex."

"Sometimes the solution can run a little slow."

"BurpSuite has some issues regarding authentication with OAT tokens that need to be improved."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"Burp Suite is affordable."

"It has a yearly license. I am satisfied with its price."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."

"We have one license. The price is very nominal."

"The platform's pricing is reasonable."

"It's a lower priced tool that we can rely on with good standard mechanisms."

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective and is best suited for small and medium-sized businesses."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

50%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

See all answers

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerab...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

I find the price of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional to be very cost-efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 19% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 14% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 20% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 15% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx One vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 2% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

March 2025

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2025

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

Burp

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

April 2025

Free Report: Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.