Invicti vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Invicti and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while PortSwigger is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Invicti holds a 1.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

3,424 Views
2,260 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

5,347 Views
3,262 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Invicti

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Invicti compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Users prefer Invicti for its extensive features, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is favored for pricing and support satisfaction.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers robust scanning capabilities, flexible testing methodologies, and reliable assessments. Invicti is known for automated scanning, comprehensive reporting functions, and efficiency in its processes.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional users suggest improvements in scalability, third-party tool integration, and enhanced UI. Invicti users desire better update notifications, improved scan speed, and a streamlined interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional provides straightforward deployment and consistent customer service, ensuring a smooth start. Invicti offers seamless deployment but faces minor initial configuration and support responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is valued for reasonable setup costs and effective ROI through vulnerability assessments. Invicti is considered pricier but delivers satisfactory ROI due to powerful automated tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (26th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (8th), API Security (9th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Invicti is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	2.1%
Invicti	1.5%
Other	96.4%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Valavan Sivgalingam

Senior Manager, Security Engineering at ESS

Dynamic testing regularly identifies web vulnerabilities and has strong false positive confirmations

It has good false positive confirmations, confirmed issues identification, and proof of exploit-related features as part of it. We use Invicti for these things in our portfolios. The solution includes Proof-Based Scanning technology. Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios. For both the API endpoints and web applications, we do regular testing on a monthly basis for all our releases. Invicti does a good job. The only concern is on the performance side, but other than that, we find it really helpful in identifying web vulnerabilities. A full scan takes more time based on your website and other factors, but for us, it takes more than two to three days. The scan performance can be improved upon. When we check with them, they discuss proof-based scanning and related aspects. However, there could be intermittent results that could help us.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios."

"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."

"Its ability to crawl a web application is quite different than another similar scanner."

"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

More Invicti pros

"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives."

"The automated scan is what I find most useful because a lot of customers will need it. Not every domain will be looking for complete security, they just need a stamp on the security key. For these kinds of customers, the scan works really well."

"The product has a good learning hub."

"It offers very good accuracy. You can trust the results."

"The most valuable feature is Burp Collaborator."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite does not hamper the node of the server, and it does not shut down the server if it is running."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the Burp Intruder tool."

"For pentesting scenarios, this is the number one tool. It can capture the request, and there are so many functions that are very good for that. For example, a black box satellite host."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"Right now, they are missing the static application security part, especially web application security."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"The custom attack preparation screen might be improved."

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

More Invicti cons

"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."

"The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution."

"I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions."

"There is a lot to this product, and it would be good if when you purchase the tool, they can provide us with a more extensive user manual."

"One area for improvement is the integrated browser, Chromium. Single Sign-On (SSO) methods like Microsoft authentication login sometimes fail and show errors. As a workaround, I have to use a different browser, such as Firefox, to log in and make Burp work."

"The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors."

"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"It is competitive in the security market."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

"The yearly cost is about $300."

"Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition."

"This solution requires a license. It is expensive but you receive a lot of functionality for the price."

"Pricing is not very high. It was around $200."

"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 13% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 8% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 5% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

January 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

January 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

Burp

Overview

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Invicti

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

February 2026

Free Report: Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.