No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Read 86 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews
  • 15,541 Views
  • 4,973 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL compete in the system and patch management category. Microsoft Configuration Manager holds an advantage in overall system management due to its broader capabilities, whereas Ivanti Patch stands out for its specialized patch management features.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager includes software distribution, endpoint protection, and comprehensive IT management solutions. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL focuses on specialized patch management with robust updating capabilities essential for system security. While Microsoft Configuration Manager offers wide-ranging management tasks, Ivanti Patch provides specific patching enhancements within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager is well-regarded for its streamlined setup process and extensive support documentation, which aids smoother deployment. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL has a straightforward deployment process tailored to its patch-specific capabilities, requiring minimal system configuration. Both products offer customer support, although Microsoft extends more comprehensive resources covering multiple management tasks.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager's initial cost is justified by its expansive capabilities and can lead to higher ROI through holistic management. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager EOL offers a separate investment, enhancing ROI by reducing system vulnerabilities. Despite higher initial pricing for Microsoft Configuration Manager, its value lies in broad management capabilities, whereas Ivanti Patch offers a cost-effective method for patch management enhancement.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
June 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Configurat...
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
Software Distribution (2nd), Server Monitoring (5th), Configuration Management (4th), Patch Management (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2019633 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2019633
Director at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Provides detection logic that tells us which customer will record an update and is less expensive than other solutions
I haven't had experience with customer service and support, however, we did have an advisory case with one of their technical support staff. We were publishing and getting the full metadata for the patch. We were getting the full updates for the patch release. There was confusion as to why we were seeing that in the SCCM, instead of in the full metadata patch. The support person was able to help us in understanding what we were doing wrong, highlighting it could be a certificate issue. We generated a new certificate, and after they were applied, the issue was fixed. Overall, I would rate their customer service and support a five out of five.
Read full review
NS
Narendar S
Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized endpoint control has streamlined deployments and improved security compliance
In my experience, the best features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are software deployments and updates, OSD, hardware and software inventory, compliance and configuration baseline, reporting and monitoring, and integration with Intune hybrid management. These features make endpoint management efficient and scalable. The feature I rely on the most day-to-day is software deployment and patch management. It keeps endpoints updated and secure with minimal manual effort. Inventory and compliance monitoring are also important, but daily deployments are critical. Microsoft Configuration Manager has had a significant positive impact on our organization in several ways: improved efficiency, enhanced security and compliance, standardization, scalability, and visibility reporting. Overall, Microsoft Configuration Manager has helped us save time, reduce risk, improve operational efficiency, and maintain strong control over our endpoints. One of the biggest impacts Microsoft Configuration Manager has had on efficiency is the reduced manual work for software deployment and patching. For example, deploying a new application or security updates to hundreds or thousands of devices previously required several days of manual effort, including running scripts, checking devices individually, and validating installation. With Microsoft Configuration Manager, these tasks are automated and managed, allowing deployments to complete in hours rather than days. We also have automated reporting for deployment success and compliance which saved the IT team significant time that used to be spent gathering and reconciling inventory data from multiple tools.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Patch for SCCM is the detection logic."
"This solution is stable."
"I like its ease of use. It does what you need it to do, and it's a one-stop-shop for the company and for all your deployments. If you incorporate Intune into it, you can have both. You can bring your own devices and corporate devices, and everything runs out of SCCM and Intune."
"SCCM, therefore, is the best that I can tell, as I've been able to evaluate it fully."
"The best thing about SCCM is the patch management."
"Because it's console-based we can create one application or patch in the console, it will download, and from the console base we can deploy to all machines."
"It gives us the ability to set up schedules, according to what our security requirements are, to automate the patching of our servers and desktops."
"Out of all the products in the market, the best solution is System Center, especially for Microsoft virtual machines and all services that are related to Microsoft Technologies."
"The stability of the product is good."
"It's a stable product."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros
 

Cons

"In future releases, I would like to see improvements with the feature upgrade for the SCCM, which Microsoft has already integrated. Currently, Ivanti does not give us information about the enablement package."
"We have some problems with patches not installing successfully."
"It is a bit of an old and outdated product."
"It is not easy to get good technical support, especially at level one."
"The deployment process is lengthy and should be quicker to complete."
"It has a very sensitive database and it almost always crashes when we use it, especially if you don't take care of it."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
"Regarding this, I'd like to mention the agent situation. When the agent on an end-user device is not functioning correctly, it can be quite problematic. It would be highly beneficial if there were a self-healing mechanism in place. Essentially, if the agent becomes corrupted or encounters issues, it should be able to rectify itself autonomously. This is particularly critical because, in order to utilize a tool like MECM (assuming you're referring to Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager), we need to deploy agents, known as AsMs, on all the devices we use, such as Windows 10 or Windows Server. Sometimes, when we deploy configurations or updates, they don't apply properly due to agent issues. This issue has been present since we began using MECM around 23 years ago. Unfortunately, there is currently no built-in mechanism for the agent to detect its own problems and initiate self-repair. Microsoft doesn’t have any feature to scan vulnerabilities and hence, they could include those."
"I want the system to provide some dependency relations. I would also like to see the relationship between different machines."
"Sometimes the time it takes to find the fault is a bit too long. The resolution time needs to be shortened quite a bit."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We do not have a license with Ivanti, instead we buy just the plugins for the consoles, making it a much less expensive option versus other solutions."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"There is an annual license needed to use the solution."
"We have a support license from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager and the overall price of the solution is reasonable."
"Microsoft provides a steep price for their enterprise products, but they offer very competitive pricing for their legacy customers."
"The price could be better."
"Its licensing is quite complicated because we are getting the license not only for SCCM but for the full Microsoft package. We don't need to pay for a separate license. We need to have one license that includes everything we need, such as Windows, Microsoft 365, SCCM, encryption, and so on. So, we don't have a specific price for it. Perhaps, it is good that it includes the full suite of licensing of Microsoft. It is expensive, but we are getting a lot of features."
"The price model is different for every client."
"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Legal Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise69
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
See all answers
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCCM?
The setup cost is considered sufficient. It is not significant enough for us to consider a change at the moment.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ManageEngine Patch Connect Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Logo
ManageEngine Patch Connect Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
Absolute Secure Endpoint vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Logo
Absolute Secure Endpoint vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
SolarWinds Patch Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Logo
SolarWinds Patch Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]
Compared 8% of the time
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL]
Compared 7% of the time
More Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] Competitors
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 6% of the time
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 4% of the time
PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 3% of the time
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 3% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Configuration Manager Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Configuration Manager
Compared 3% of the time
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Patch Management
July 2026
Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] reportDownload Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Configuration Manager
July 2026
Microsoft Configuration Manager reportDownload Microsoft Configuration Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Patch for SCCM, Shavlik Patch for SCCM, Ivanti Patch for MEM
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS
 

Overview

Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager enhances Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager by automating patch management. It strengthens security by streamlining processes and ensuring systems are up-to-date and protected against vulnerabilities.

Utilizing Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager ensures robust patch management by integrating seamlessly with Microsoft SCCM. It simplifies identifying and deploying critical patches, significantly reducing system vulnerabilities. With advanced automation capabilities, it eases the workload on IT teams while ensuring high levels of compliance and security. Its real-time data reporting enhances visibility, enabling informed decision-making. The tool seamlessly updates systems without disrupting users, making it essential for maintaining business continuity.

What are the key features of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager?

  • Automated Patch Management: Simplifies and accelerates the patch deployment process.
  • Seamless Integration: Works directly with Microsoft SCCM for streamlined operations.
  • Real-Time Reporting: Offers detailed insights into patch statuses and deployment success.
  • Security Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and policies.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

  • Reduced Security Risks: Minimizes vulnerabilities through timely patch updates.
  • Increased Efficiency: Saves time and resources through automation and integration.
  • Enhanced Compliance: Meets regulatory requirements with consistent patching strategies.
  • Improved System Stability: Maintains optimal performance and uptime.

Implementation of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is seen across industries requiring stringent compliance and security protocols, such as healthcare and finance. In healthcare, it helps protect sensitive patient data, while in finance, it secures critical transaction systems. It supports diverse environments, ensuring patching needs are effectively managed.

Ivanti

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?
  • Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
  • Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
  • Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
  • Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
  • Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
  • Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
  • Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
  • Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.
What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?
  • Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
  • Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
  • Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
  • Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
  • Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
  • Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

University of Pittsburgh
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Buyer's Guide
Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
June 2026
Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.