No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Qualys Patch Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...
Ranking in Patch Management
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qualys Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 2.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys Patch Management is 2.8%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qualys Patch Management2.8%
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager2.2%
Other95.0%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

PraveenRajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Infrastructure at Elevate Services
Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects
We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.
Saurab Gnagurde - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Analyst | Aws Cloud Ops | Dev Ops | Fin Ops at Tata Consultancy
Centralized patch automation has improved compliance and keeps hybrid cloud servers always updated
One area where I think Qualys Patch Management can improve is reporting and dashboard customization. As patching and vulnerability remediation are regular operational activities, having more flexible reporting options and granular insights would help operations teams track patch compliance, remediation status, failed deployments, and outstanding vulnerabilities more effectively. In larger environments, it would also be useful to have more customizable dashboards tailored to different teams such as operations, security, and management. This would make it easier to view the most relevant information without creating multiple reports. Another improvement could be enhanced troubleshooting information for failed patch deployments or agent communication issues. During large-scale patching activities, having more detailed error reporting would help teams identify and resolve issues faster. Overall, my experience with Qualys Patch Management has been positive. It provides good visibility into vulnerabilities and patch compliance, and with some additional reporting and dashboard enhancements, it would be even more useful for day-to-day operational teams.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."
"Because of the internet gateway, we were able to get clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint which we needed to do recently when everyone was working from home."
"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"Qualys Patch Management has helped us a lot, actually, and we completely rely on Qualys Patch Management with Qualys agents installed on all our environments to ensure our servers are always remediation free and the latest patches are there."
"We have seen about 60% to 70% improvement in the patch rate so far."
"Qualys Patch Management offers a valuable feature that allows for deferred reboots, giving users control while still ensuring eventual patching."
"Qualys allows us to automate and fix patches through the tool, achieving a compliance rate of over 95%."
"Our patch rate was 85 percent before implementing Qualys Patch Management, and now it is 98 percent."
"The most valuable features are the ease of managing both first-party and third-party patching, the generation of dashboards, and the provision of real-time information."
"Since implementing Qualys Patch Management, we have seen measurable improvements in remediation speed, reducing our patch turnaround time significantly from four weeks with a compliance of about 60% to about 24 to 48 hours for critical vulnerabilities with an average vulnerability count per device down to around 10."
"Qualys Patch Management excels with its automated patch scheduling and retrieval."
 

Cons

"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"I'm currently struggling with one of the issues related to Linux or Ubuntu. Ivanti does not support Ubuntu and it has a limitation of CentOS to a specific version, which is CentOS 7, not 8."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"The UI must be more user-friendly."
"There is not really anything I dislike about Qualys Patch Management for obvious reasons, but there are no rollback capabilities."
"Some patches require OEM consent or must be released by OEM. For example, if an outdated version of a tool like Falcon is detected, Qualys flags it as a vulnerability, but cannot automate the patch update."
"For those patches that I have to download for Patch Management, I would prefer if I could upload them to a repository instead of having to download them every time."
"Qualys could improve its capacity to fix vulnerabilities on VMware and other virtualized environments. The reporting could also be enhanced to make it more user-friendly. It's difficult for beginners to learn."
"They need to improve the user-friendliness of identifying how many devices are affected by a particular patch. It is not intuitive, and there should be clearer indicators or buttons to access this information easily."
"Since we do not have that solution criteria, we end up calling multiple teams and asking them what version needs to be deployed."
"Qualys Patch Management would benefit from enhanced integration to address its current limitations in patching new features."
"To be improved or enhanced in Qualys Patch Management, some patches are not automatically updated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."
"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."
"The licensing cost is more than 2,000 for the whole Americas region"
"Its price is competitive in the market. Compared to other solutions like Rapid7, Qualys offers a favorable price point and robust features."
"Qualys Patch Management offers a moderate price point, neither cheap nor expensive, considering its comprehensive functionality."
"I'm unaware of Qualys' exact price, but it's more expensive than Nessus. With technological products, you need to pay to get the best."
"The pricing is fair and within our budget."
"Qualys is fairly priced."
"Qualys Patch Management's pricing is competitive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise31
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?
In terms of quantifying how much it reduces the cost, I have no issues asking.
What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?
One area where I think Qualys Patch Management can improve is reporting and dashboard customization. As patching and vulnerability remediation are regular operational activities, having more flexib...
What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?
What are your main use case/s for Qualys Patch Management? M7 4C6.44772 4 6 4.44772 6 5V12V19C6 19.5523 6.44772 20 7 20H14C15.1935 20 16.3381 19.5259 17.182 18.682C18.0259 17.8381 18.5 16.6935 18.5...
 

Also Known As

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Qualys Patch Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.