Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Vicarius vRx comparison

Ivanti and Vicarius are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5, while Vicarius is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Ivanti holds a 2.1% mindshare in PM, compared to Vicarius’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Vicarius users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager reviews

474 Views
474 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Vicarius vRx

Read 21 Vicarius vRx reviews

2,511 Views
1,306 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Vicarius vRx

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Vicarius vRx are two prominent solutions in endpoint management. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager excels in ease of deployment and customer service, while Vicarius vRx leads in pricing and ROI, making it a valuable investment for users.

Features: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers comprehensive patch management, automated scans, and remediation workflows. Vicarius vRx is noted for its advanced threat detection, integrated risk management features, and innovative risk prioritization.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager could benefit from a more intuitive reporting mechanism, faster update release cycles, and enhanced integration capabilities. Vicarius vRx needs improvements in its integration capabilities, more detailed documentation, and its customer support consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive support team. Vicarius vRx's deployment is also user-friendly, but its customer support is reported to be less consistent.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager users find its setup costs higher but note a satisfactory return on investment. Vicarius vRx offers competitive pricing with strong ROI, justifying the investment despite initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Vicarius vRx Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Vicarius vRx

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vicarius vRx

Ranking in Patch Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (15th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vicarius vRx is 3.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Vicarius vRx	3.5%
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager	2.1%
Other	94.4%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

PraveenRajan

Director of Infrastructure at Elevate Services

Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects

We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.

Read full review

OrenBen Shalom

Information Security Manager at Pango

Consolidates vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation in a single platform

Vicarius vRx offers several advantages, especially for organizations with diverse operating systems and applications requiring frequent patching. The platform helps prioritize patch installation by identifying high-risk vulnerabilities, allowing IT teams to focus on critical threats first. This prioritization is crucial because it prevents IT teams from being overwhelmed by the constant influx of patches, enabling them to create a manageable plan and allocate resources effectively. By distinguishing between critical, high-risk, and medium-risk vulnerabilities, Vicarius vRx empowers IT teams to address the most urgent threats promptly and schedule less critical patches for later. Both native operating system updates and Vicarius vRx offer vulnerability remediation. Native OS updates allow for the patching of system vulnerabilities on Windows, macOS, and Linux. However, Vicarius vRx provides a single solution for installing both operating system and application updates by also discovering application vulnerabilities. Another valuable feature is virtual patching, which allows us to protect an asset from a specific vulnerability without installing a patch. Sometimes, installing a patch alone is insufficient and requires restarting the asset. However, production servers often cannot be restarted during the day, restricting restarts to specific timeslots. Virtual patching creates a network-based protection layer that prevents exploitation of a vulnerability, offering a temporary safeguard. While not a foolproof solution for long-term use, it's a valuable tool that reduces tension between IT and security teams by providing time to properly install patches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."

"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."

"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."

"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."

"Vicarius vRx consolidates vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation in a single platform."

"I like that vRx is cloud-based. It protects the health of applications against zero-day threats."

"I liked the initial dashboard."

"While other vulnerability scanners overwhelm us with a huge list of problems after a scan, Vicarius vRx goes beyond that."

"Vicarius vRx's primary strength is its user-friendly interface."

"Vicarius vRx's automation feature is its most valuable, allowing us to automate manual tasks, receive automated reports, and easily check device update status."

"Vicarius vRx has reduced 70% of the time we spend on patching."

"Third-party software patching is the most valuable feature."

More Vicarius vRx pros

Cons

"The UI must be more user-friendly."

"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."

"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."

"Inability to configure a rule-based management."

"I would like to see more network architecture elements with patches."

"I don't like logging in. The portal could be a better process. You could use some third-party push notification rather than sending an email, waiting for the link to generate, and clicking on it. That would be good. It's somewhat frustrating when I need to log in."

"I would be happy if the patch update could be downloaded to the Vicarius server and then implemented on the client."

"The network device vulnerability scans can be improved. It would be helpful to be able to mitigate those vulnerabilities using SSH or SNMP to get those those updates out to those devices. I don't know if that is possible because it doesn't run an agent. But at the very least, having that CPE information relative to network devices would be incredibly helpful."

"The user interface for deploying patches can be improved, as it appears complicated when launching patches. We can launch it for apps or OS, but the steps to get there are a bit tedious. This is the only thing."

"There can be more scripting capability and more filtering capability. We should be able to filter more granular details in the operating system such as whether it is a service, application, executable, or something like that. For the most part, we are satisfied with what we are able to filter."

"We did some automation. We kicked off scheduled updates to update our systems, but it did not work. When we attempted to scale the product and update multiple systems, we ran into a lot of issues. We also ran into the issue of it creating double assets."

"The multi-tenant portal has room for improvement."

More Vicarius vRx cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."

"Vicarius' pricing was reasonable compared to the other systems we evaluated."

"Vicarius vRx is reasonably priced."

"The pricing is great because we are a reseller of the product. It is really up to us and Vicarius, and they are very easy to work with."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but it would have saved us some costs."

"From a pricing perspective, Vicarius was cheaper compared to other competitors."

"I know we got it for a very cheap price, and I now see why. It was very cheap. It was maybe 12,000 or 14,000 dollars."

"The pricing was very reasonable and fair compared to other products. I liked that there was no tiered system. One price gave access to everything, which is nice. It is not something you get too often with enterprise IT."

"I do not use other solutions, so I cannot compare its pricing to others, but its price seems okay."

More Vicarius vRx pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Government

10%

University

Computer Software Company

14%

Media Company

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

The UI must be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vicarius vRx?

I do not use other solutions, so I cannot compare its pricing to others, but its price seems okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vicarius vRx?

I would be happy if the patch update could be downloaded to the Vicarius server and then implemented on the client. Currently, they just send a link to the software. For example, if I want to updat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vicarius vRx?

We use Vicarius vRx to manage all third-party software updates. Previously, we could manage Windows updates, but third-party updates were an issue. It was difficult for us to manage the updates of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Patch My PC vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 30% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 18% of the time

GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 11% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 22% of the time

NinjaOne vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 12% of the time

Qualys Patch Management vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 9% of the time

More Vicarius vRx Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

September 2025

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report

Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Vicarius vRx

September 2025

Download Vicarius vRx product report

Also Known As

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints

No data available

Overview

Patch for Endpoint Manager can swiftly detect vulnerabilities in Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and hundreds of third-party apps (Acrobat Flash/Reader, Java, Web browsers, and more) and deploy expertly pre-tested patches everywhere you need them.

Ivanti

Vicarius vRx automates patching and vulnerability mitigation with patchless protection, appreciated for effective third-party app patching and vulnerability prioritization. The platform offers streamlined management via intuitive dashboards, consolidating vulnerability discovery and remediation.

Vicarius vRx streamlines the patching and vulnerability mitigation process, delivering automation through patchless protection. It is favored for its ability to handle third-party applications effectively while providing vulnerability prioritization. The platform's intuitive dashboards allow for efficient management, consolidating vulnerability discovery and remediation efforts. Users note the robust scripting engine and supportive community as significant assets in mitigating critical threats, reducing manual effort and remediation time. Despite the strengths, enhancements in areas like automating patchless solutions, simplifying the login process, and refining networking vulnerability scanning capabilities are needed. The patch update process, reporting, and scripting functionalities require improvements. Name changes have resulted in some confusion, and additional filtering options are desired, along with better cloud integration and system feedback on update statuses. Logging options and mobile device management support are sought after by organizations.

What are the key features of Vicarius vRx?

Patchless Protection: Automates vulnerability mitigation without patches.
Third-Party App Patching: Effectively manages updates for non-native applications.
Vulnerability Prioritization: Identifies and prioritizes critical threats efficiently.
Intuitive Dashboards: Simplifies management and oversight of vulnerabilities.
Robust Scripting Engine: Provides tools for custom threat mitigation strategies.

What benefits can users expect from using Vicarius vRx?

Efficiency Gains: Streamlines vulnerability discovery and remediation processes.
Reduced Remediation Time: Minimizes manual effort with automation.
Improved Threat Response: Quick application of critical patches across numerous assets.
Enhanced Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and compliance support.
Audit Compliance: Meets requirements for PCI, HIPAA, and regulatory frameworks.

Managed service providers utilize Vicarius vRx for compliance needs, focusing on PCI and HIPAA requirements, vulnerability management, and patching. They use it extensively for patch management, covering both Microsoft and third-party updates, and for centralized update management. It aids in achieving visibility and automation, ensuring quick application of necessary patches across numerous assets while enhancing cybersecurity effectiveness with its network functionality and audit compliance features.

Vicarius

Sample Customers

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Vicarius vRx

September 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Vicarius vRx

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Vicarius vRx and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Vicarius vRx report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.