Ivanti Secure Access vs SonicWall SMA comparison

Ivanti and SonicWall are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Ivanti is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while SonicWall is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0. Ivanti holds a 2.1% mindshare in EIV, compared to SonicWall’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Secure Access

Read 3 Ivanti Secure Access reviews

601 Views
102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonicWall SMA

Read 14 SonicWall SMA reviews

781 Views
164 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Ivanti Secure Access

SonicWall SMA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

SonicWall SMA and Ivanti Secure Access are key competitors in secure access solutions. Ivanti Secure Access appears more robust in features, making it worth the higher cost for many users.

Features: SonicWall SMA offers core security capabilities, ease of integration, and user-friendly management. Ivanti Secure Access provides advanced security options, comprehensive feature sets, and seamless multi-platform support.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall SMA users suggest enhancing performance stability, strengthening VPN connections, and refining user interface consistency. Ivanti Secure Access can improve documentation, streamline updates, and optimize resource usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall SMA is straightforward to deploy and offers satisfactory customer service. Ivanti Secure Access, though more complex to deploy, provides robust customer support, often praised for its responsiveness and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall SMA is recognized for reasonable setup costs and good ROI. Ivanti Secure Access, despite being pricier, justifies its cost with high perceived value and impressive ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Secure Access vs. SonicWall SMA Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. SonicWall SMA

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Secure Access

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonicWall SMA

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Universal Access Gateways (2nd), SSL VPN (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Ivanti Secure Access is 2.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall SMA is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

Kaushlendra Singh

Manager - IT Infrastructure and Network at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Integrates well, highly reliable, but lacking reporting

Pulse Client is used as a client VPN or an SSL VPN The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication. Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are…

Read full review

Maheshbabu T

Project Manager at CGG

It allows us to provide CML-based access to any user, but the reporting could be better

I rate SonicWall SMA seven out of 10. If you're planning to implement this solution, I suggest checking the version to ensure it's compatible with your other technology. I say go for it if it's suitable for your use case. Multifactor authentication technologies are built into the product, whereas some products lack multifactor authentication. We need only one or two. They provide authentication, gateway integration, OTP integration, etc.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."

"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."

"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."

"The solution is reliable and has good overall performance."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is they have IT consultants that know SonicWall."

"This solution has many options for remote desktop and access."

"It is faster than other security options when using remote connections."

"I think they ask for a fair price."

"The performance is good."

"What I like best about SonicWall SMA is the relationship between its features and its price, because the solution is both affordable and functional."

"SonicWall SMA has the most valuable feature of proprietary security technologies like Capture ATP."

More SonicWall SMA pros

Cons

"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."

"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."

"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."

"User interface could be improved."

"SonicWall's reporting isn't good. Reports should be part of a data plan. The login mechanism should be improved. It would be helpful if the client could use an agent to log in. An agent-server model would improve the performance of the RDB, which consumes a lot of bandwidth."

"I'd like to see the product maybe polish keyboards in Bookmark."

"The problem is that when combined with what the client already has, there are two different logins and two different management systems, and these should be consolidated into a single interface."

"The only thing that they could try to improve is the support for enterprise customers. Normally enterprises and SMBs can create a ticket, but for enterprises, SonicWall SMA needs to provide a global view, and this is what's currently missing. It's not even a question of timing. It's a question of the global vision because currently, it's lacking. They concentrate on the topic, but not on the means and not on the global picture. In most cases, there's something wrong with the integration of SonicWall SMA with other products, so that could also be improved."

"This is an expensive solution and I think that the price could be improved."

"The timed synchronization between the network appliance needs improvement."

"The product itself is very good, but Dell needs to work on product visibility in their advertising."

More SonicWall SMA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pulse Client has two types of licenses. One is subsistence-based and the second is perpetual-based. The license cost is good, it is not very costly."

"All the costs are included in a bundled license."

"I don't know about the pricing of the SSL-VPN box. I know the SSL-VPN software is free. Global VPN client, by comparison, is licensed for around $150 or something like that. But the SSL-VPN software is free. It is already built-in with the box."

"The cost of the licensing is based on the maximum number of concurrent users, and it costs a lot to add them."

"The platform has medium pricing."

"Our licenses are stackable and can be anywhere from five users to a million users."

"This solution is priced well and we currently have the maximum number of licenses allowed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pulse Client?

Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ. Ivanti Secure Access offers granular control over network access, allowing for o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pulse Client?

We use the solution to access the corporate network.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Pulse Client?

The tool is a preferred option for making the tunnel from these cloud VPNs. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about SonicWall SMA?

Blocklisting and allowlisting are the most beneficial features for network security.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall SMA?

The platform has medium pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall SMA?

Enhancing live tracking capabilities could improve the product, particularly in monitoring user activity and request statuses in real-time on the web interface.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 72% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

Tailscale vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Secure Access Competitors

Peplink SpeedFusion vs SonicWall SMA

Compared 20% of the time

SonicWall Netextender vs SonicWall SMA

Compared 17% of the time

Ivanti Connect Secure vs SonicWall SMA

Compared 16% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs SonicWall SMA

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall SMA

Compared 9% of the time

More SonicWall SMA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

June 2025

Download Ivanti Secure Access product report

Buyer's Guide

SonicWall SMA

June 2025

Download SonicWall SMA product report

Also Known As

Pulse Client

SonicWall Aventail, SonicWall SMA SSL-VPN, SonicWall Secure Mobile Access

Overview

Easily secure your hybrid workforce Elevate your VPN experience with Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access—a unified platform that seamlessly integrates Ivanti Connect Secure and Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access. Harness the power of cloud-based centralization to gain real-time insights, optimize access management and enhance security across your network. Take control and thrive in today's borderless digital landscape.

Ivanti

SonicWall SMA is a unified secure access gateway that enables organizations to provide anytime, anywhere and any device access to mission critical corporate resources. SMA's granular access control policy engine, context aware device authorization, application level VPN and advanced authentication with single sign-on empowers organizations to embrace BYOD and mobility in a hybrid IT environment.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UnitedStack, Newport City Homes, Faith Lutheran College Redlands, PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Celtic Manor Resort

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. SonicWall SMA

June 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Secure Access vs. SonicWall SMA

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Secure Access vs. SonicWall SMA and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. SonicWall SMA report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.