Ivanti Secure Access vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Ivanti is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Ivanti holds a 2.3% mindshare in EIV, compared to Microsoft’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Secure Access

Read 3 Ivanti Secure Access reviews

1,133 Views
1,122 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Read 27 Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway reviews

3,023 Views
2,993 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Ivanti Secure Access

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Ivanti Secure Access and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway both compete in the networking solutions category. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is seen as more feature-rich, justifying its higher cost and preference.

Features: Ivanti Secure Access offers comprehensive security measures, seamless integration capabilities, and user-friendly pricing. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway stands out for its scalability, cloud-native advantages, and advanced networking features.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Secure Access needs enhancements in scalability options, cloud integration capabilities, and better documentation. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway users mention the need for more intuitive setup processes, improved customer service response times, and enhancements in usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Secure Access is praised for its simple deployment process and responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway offers a more complex but highly scalable deployment model, with adequate customer service, though it may be less prompt.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Secure Access is noted for its competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway has higher initial costs but provides strong ROI due to its extensive features and cloud-native advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Secure Access

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Ivanti Secure Access is 2.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is 5.1%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway	5.1%
Ivanti Secure Access	2.3%
Other	92.6%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

BabarShahbaz

Saleas Lead at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

A cloud solution to access the corporate network with BYOD policy

Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ. Ivanti Secure Access offers granular control over network access, allowing for on-demand VPN connections when accessing corporate resources. This means users may not need to initiate a VPN connection manually but can access resources seamlessly when accessing corporate websites or applications. This granular feature helps enhance security and user experience by providing secure access only when needed.

Read full review

MatsHagberg Olsson2

Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology

Designs subnets with high security while navigating evolving integration processes

The primary function of Azure VPN Gateway allows for designing subnets from existing networks, whether they are physical or virtual networks within Azure or other cloud instances. You can configure these networks using IP numbers and connect them using certificates or SaaS strings. It also requires Entra ID for privileged access groups, resulting in high security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."

"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."

"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."

"The scalability is a highly valued feature."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The best feature is the ability to connect from anywhere."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its performance. It is very fast."

"The solution is very quick to connect."

"The VPN Gateway is valued for its ease of use and redundancy."

"The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway pros

Cons

"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."

"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."

"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."

"I would like to see improvements in the deployment process as I faced challenges."

"The instructions should have been more accessible and less time-consuming to find the best solution tailored for the customer."

"Considering my past interactions with Microsoft's support team, it is difficult to get the right support unless you find the right person to speak with from the customer support team."

"Microsoft's support is rated at four due to issues such as speed of response and coordination difficulties."

"The price of the solution should be more affordable"

"The product must provide a single sign-on."

"The instructions on how to integrate P2N and P2S type networks into Azure VPN Gateway could be improved, though it is a constantly evolving process."

"Documentation and configuration settings can be improved."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pulse Client has two types of licenses. One is subsistence-based and the second is perpetual-based. The license cost is good, it is not very costly."

"The product costs us $140 to $180 per month."

"Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is the cheapest way for us to connect to our cloud infrastructure. Other solutions, such as ExpressRoute are very expensive."

"I pay the licensing charges associated with the tool on an hourly basis. The tool is affordable."

"The costs are quite high."

"The solution is subscription-based and very cheap."

"It's saved us money compared to getting a third-party appliance."

"Its price is reasonable for new technology."

"The software has good pricing compared to other vendors."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pulse Client?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pulse Client?

We use the solution to access the corporate network.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Pulse Client?

The tool is a preferred option for making the tunnel from these cloud VPNs. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

The solution is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway can be improved in security points with stronger encryption. I do not have additional feedback about needed improvements regarding configuration, support, or documentation.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

My advice to others looking into using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is that if you have a specific use case such as site-to-site VPN, then this is a perfect option for you. I rate Microsoft Azure VP...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 39% of the time

Tailscale vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 11% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 8% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 7% of the time

More Ivanti Secure Access Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Virtual Intranet Access vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

January 2026

Download Ivanti Secure Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway product report

Also Known As

Pulse Client

MS Azure VPN Gateway

Overview

Easily secure your hybrid workforce Elevate your VPN experience with Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access—a unified platform that seamlessly integrates Ivanti Connect Secure and Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access. Harness the power of cloud-based centralization to gain real-time insights, optimize access management and enhance security across your network. Take control and thrive in today's borderless digital landscape.

Ivanti

A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

December 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.