Ivanti Secure Access vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Ivanti is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8. Ivanti holds a 2.1% mindshare in EIV, compared to Microsoft’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Secure Access

Read 3 Ivanti Secure Access reviews

838 Views
838 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Read 27 Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway reviews

3,343 Views
3,310 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Ivanti Secure Access

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Ivanti Secure Access and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway both compete in the networking solutions category. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is seen as more feature-rich, justifying its higher cost and preference.

Features: Ivanti Secure Access offers comprehensive security measures, seamless integration capabilities, and user-friendly pricing. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway stands out for its scalability, cloud-native advantages, and advanced networking features.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Secure Access needs enhancements in scalability options, cloud integration capabilities, and better documentation. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway users mention the need for more intuitive setup processes, improved customer service response times, and enhancements in usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Secure Access is praised for its simple deployment process and responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway offers a more complex but highly scalable deployment model, with adequate customer service, though it may be less prompt.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Secure Access is noted for its competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway has higher initial costs but provides strong ROI due to its extensive features and cloud-native advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Secure Access

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Ivanti Secure Access is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is 5.9%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway	5.9%
Ivanti Secure Access	2.1%
Other	92.0%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

BabarShahbaz

Saleas Lead at Juniper Networks

A cloud solution to access the corporate network with BYOD policy

Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ. Ivanti Secure Access offers granular control over network access, allowing for on-demand VPN connections when accessing corporate resources. This means users may not need to initiate a VPN connection manually but can access resources seamlessly when accessing corporate websites or applications. This granular feature helps enhance security and user experience by providing secure access only when needed.

Read full review

MatsHagberg Olsson2

Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology

Designs subnets with high security while navigating evolving integration processes

The primary function of Azure VPN Gateway allows for designing subnets from existing networks, whether they are physical or virtual networks within Azure or other cloud instances. You can configure these networks using IP numbers and connect them using certificates or SaaS strings. It also requires Entra ID for privileged access groups, resulting in high security.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."

"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."

"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."

"The product has valuable virtual machines, viability options, and enhanced VPN services, enabling the option to use it in different zones."

"The ability to connect old protocols like Border Gateway Protocol is valuable."

"It works perfectly for me. It is very user-friendly in terms of the configuration and the setup process."

"I rate the product ten out of ten."

"It is scalable and depends on your chosen network bandwidth."

"The side-to-side connections are valuable."

"It is a stable solution in our company, and we monitor critical health and performance parameters daily and weekly."

"It is easy to configure."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway pros

Cons

"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."

"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."

"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."

"There is a need to improve the paperwork and management approval process, which is currently painful, though not directly related to the VPN Gateway itself."

"They should release a less expensive version of the solution."

"The price of the solution should be more affordable"

"The marketing material in the portal is not very user-friendly."

"The monitoring part needs to be improved."

"Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway could improve by providing IPS zero-day threat protection. For example, the IPS zero-day threat protection can monitor the user behavior to protect the infrastructure. The solution can only be used as a VPN, it is lacking features."

"Their technical support could be better. If you don't have a support contract, it takes longer."

"The instructions on how to integrate P2N and P2S type networks into Azure VPN Gateway could be improved, though it is a constantly evolving process."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pulse Client has two types of licenses. One is subsistence-based and the second is perpetual-based. The license cost is good, it is not very costly."

"It's saved us money compared to getting a third-party appliance."

"The costs are quite high."

"I pay the licensing charges associated with the tool on an hourly basis. The tool is affordable."

"The cost could be lower."

"It's an expensive product"

"The software has good pricing compared to other vendors."

"Its price is reasonable for new technology."

"The product costs us $140 to $180 per month."

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Performing Arts

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pulse Client?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pulse Client?

We use the solution to access the corporate network.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Pulse Client?

The tool is a preferred option for making the tunnel from these cloud VPNs. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

The solution is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

In Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, there aren't too many areas for improvement, but the configuration part might be a little tricky. It took some time to get things to work, but once figured out, it b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway?

We work with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and the VPN firewalls. We have our local physical firewall infrastructure from Cisco and other companies, but we can't compare those with the virtual networ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 69% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 7% of the time

Tailscale vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

More Ivanti Secure Access Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 24% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 16% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

August 2025

Download Ivanti Secure Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

September 2025

Download Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway product report

Also Known As

Pulse Client

MS Azure VPN Gateway

Overview

Easily secure your hybrid workforce Elevate your VPN experience with Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access—a unified platform that seamlessly integrates Ivanti Connect Secure and Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access. Harness the power of cloud-based centralization to gain real-time insights, optimize access management and enhance security across your network. Take control and thrive in today's borderless digital landscape.

Ivanti

A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

September 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.