

OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway are both competitors in the VPN solution category, offering unique features tailored to different user needs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway appears to have the upper hand with its enterprise-grade security and seamless integration with Azure services, which provides significant value for larger organizations despite its higher cost.
Features: OpenVPN Access Server provides flexibility across multiple operating systems, open-source availability, and high levels of encryption. It is highly customizable and supports robust remote connection capabilities. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway emphasizes performance, reliability, and integration with Azure services. It supports multiple protocols such as BGP, offers scalability, and delivers strong enterprise-grade security.
Room for Improvement: OpenVPN Access Server users suggest improvements in its user interface, scalability, and security features like firewall functionalities. For Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, users highlight the need for better connectivity stability and pricing transparency. Improving the deployment process and real-time monitoring tools is also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenVPN Access Server is praised for its ease of deployment, especially on Linux, and extensive community support helps users find solutions independently. In contrast, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway offers flexible hybrid cloud deployment options, it often requires stronger technical support, which some users find lacking.
Pricing and ROI: OpenVPN Access Server is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, making it attractive for small projects and startups. It offers a good ROI, especially in initial setup cost savings. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, which is subscription-based, can be expensive but provides value through enhanced service functionalities and enterprise integration.
The solution provides significant cost savings, transitioning expenses from CapEx to OpEx.
Time savings have notably increased because establishing the connection with Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway was straightforward.
Prioritization of tasks can also be challenging, impacting the timely resolution of problems.
In a recent incident, I had an issue with the SharePoint API. It relates to documentation, specifically the lack of up-to-date documentation because Microsoft is moving away from the traditional SharePoint REST API to Microsoft Graph.
We received the required support whenever we encountered challenges.
I would rate the technical support an eight on a scale of one to ten.
Any issue was solved in five to ten minutes.
It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.
The process was very efficient to scale the solution, which supports a high level of scalability.
It is auto-scalable, and I do not see any issues regarding scalability.
When we deploy and install OpenVPN Access Server, the principle is to install and forget.
It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.
It is scalable on AWS because it is a matter of increasing the instance size and increasing the number of licenses.
Azure VPN Gateway is very stable due to reliance on Microsoft's own network.
Regarding stability, I have not had any crashes, performance issues, or stability issues with OpenVPN Access Server.
I find it very stable.
More detailed logging would help in troubleshooting any failures during connection establishment or monitoring Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway.
The instructions on how to integrate P2N and P2S type networks into Azure VPN Gateway could be improved, though it is a constantly evolving process.
If they had a one-click setup where you provide credentials instead of manually running commands, that would be beneficial.
If there was a dedicated plan for startups, it would be really helpful.
You can see who can access what resources from the user view, but you can also see the reverse, which is which resource can be accessed by what users.
We are paying around $300 per month for a VPN gateway, which seems high.
The pricing is somewhat high but acceptable, considering it replaces the need for physical network equipment, leading to cost savings.
The price of Azure VPN Gateway should be rated five from a purely invoice aspect.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OpenVPN Access Server is really good, not that expensive.
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost of OpenVPN Access Server is that the licensing is fair for the value provided.
It simplifies the process of deploying a VPN connection, replacing all the physical network elements with a software appliance.
The primary function of Azure VPN Gateway allows for designing subnets from existing networks, whether they are physical or virtual networks within Azure or other cloud instances.
The best feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its sophisticated security mechanism for transmitting data between on-premise to Azure or Azure to Azure.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
The main benefits I have seen from using OpenVPN Access Server include secure access to private resources over the public internet.
OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted my organization by allowing access to our private services, enhancing security, and enabling remote work from anywhere.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenVPN Access Server | 13.3% |
| Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway | 4.6% |
| Other | 82.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 35 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise provides secure, scalable remote access with strong encryption and cross-platform compatibility, leveraging open-source flexibility for cost-effectiveness. It's ideal for connecting remote workers, maintaining privacy, and securing network communications.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is renowned for its ease of setup and adaptability, supporting Linux and different operating systems, which ensures robust security and seamless integration across network scenarios. With features like two-factor authentication and customizable installers, it emphasizes privacy and remote connectivity. While it offers robust documentation and community support, there are challenges with user management due to the lack of a simple GUI. Users note stability issues under heavy traffic, and improvements in security features and configuration automation are desired. Despite these areas for enhancement, it remains a reliable choice for secure remote access.
What are the key features?
What benefits and ROI should users seek?
In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise secures sensitive data while enabling remote access across LANs and VPCs. It's utilized for encrypted traffic protection, facilitating site-to-site VPNs, and connecting mobile workers securely, thus maintaining data integrity in interoffice communications and IoT platforms.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.