Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate comparison

Ivanti and Qualys are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Read 4 Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Read 57 Qualys TruRisk Eliminate reviews

4,457 Views
4,457 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] and Qualys Patch Management are products in the patch management category. Qualys Patch Management seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive cloud-based features, extensive reporting, and automated patch deployment capabilities, which justify its higher price for many users.

Features: Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] enables easy integration with existing systems, effective vulnerability remediation, and offers both agent-based and agentless patching. Qualys Patch Management excels with its cloud-based platform, extensive reporting and analytics tools, and advanced vulnerability prioritization through its risk-based approach.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] can enhance its reporting capabilities and improve scalability to handle larger networks. It may benefit from more robust automation features. Qualys Patch Management could improve its initial configuration process, streamline its user interface for beginners, and reduce complexity in its patch scheduling features for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers a straightforward on-premise deployment with personalized customer service, ensuring quick issue resolution. Qualys Patch Management provides a flexible cloud-based deployment model that enables rapid implementation and easy scaling, though some users find its customer service less personal compared to Ivanti's.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] is known for lower setup costs and a fast return on investment due to its competitive pricing. Qualys Patch Management, despite its higher initial costs, delivers substantial ROI over time through advanced automation features, significantly reducing operational expenses and enhancing long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (1st)

Featured Reviews

Chethan R

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility

This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.

Read full review

SangramGupta

Security Consultant at Deloitte

Automated patching has transformed risk-based remediation and now optimizes security workflows

I can highlight two areas for improvement. The first is better reporting flexibility and dashboard customization. Qualys VMDR has a great dashboard that I can customize, but Qualys Patch Management does not have a specific dashboard associated only with patch management and patch compliance. The customization could be improved significantly. The second area is third-party application coverage. Qualys Patch Management works very effectively when patching servers, internal servers, Windows, iOS, or Linux servers. However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch. The deployment issue with third-party applications needs enhancement, as even with integration, Qualys Patch Management is not able to deploy patches for some third-party applications. These are the two main points I can highlight for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ivanti Security Controls is an agentless tool which means we do not need to install any agent on the server or endpoint, and through agentless capabilities, it can install software, install patches, and control over the server, including asset management."

"Technical support is helpful and responsive."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a better solution than SCCM."

"What has been most valuable is the ability to manage, restore and install upgrades and applications. We scan PCs and server and receive results."

"Customer service is exceptional."

"Qualys Patch Management offers valuable features like scheduling and on-demand patching, allowing us to conveniently push patches to our servers at designated times."

"Patch Management, if configured correctly, works effectively without requiring further action."

"Compared to other tools, Qualys is better due to its automation capabilities, which allow us to achieve high compliance rates."

"The most valuable features of Qualys Patch Management include its ability to automate patch deployment for hundreds or thousands of assets, reducing our reliance on the IT team to perform these tasks manually."

"The most valuable features are the ease of managing both first-party and third-party patching, the generation of dashboards, and the provision of real-time information."

"Qualys Patch Management combined with Qualys VMDR integrates solutions into one system, offering a single source of truth for assets and vulnerabilities needing assessment and remediation."

"My overall rating for Qualys Patch Management is a ten out of ten."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate pros

Cons

"When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve."

"It should be more scalable."

"For the Windows upgrade, the errors we experience are not clear. We see a time out error but do not know the reason. We would like to know the root cause."

"There is a single loophole within patch rates related to zero-day vulnerabilities, which present notable challenges in cybersecurity that Qualys Patch Management needs to improve on, as they sometimes require extensive time to mitigate."

"It would be better if Qualys Patch Management identifies whether the process has failed at the first instance and provides a retry button or retry mechanism, allowing retries for failed patches. This feature would reduce my manual workload."

"While I've recently seen many problems with stability and reliability in Qualys, it was initially stable; however, current issues include modules being offline for extended periods."

"However, when doing application security with third-party applications that require patches, it sometimes fails to complete the patch."

"Customer support for Qualys Patch Management is lacking. The support cases we've raised often resulted in us finding the solution independently."

"Qualys Patch Management can be improved by enhancing the reporting capabilities and dashboards since it is difficult to extract customized executive reports for the board."

"During large-scale patching activity deployment on more than 100 plus, 200 plus servers, we occasionally observed that troubleshooting failed patches and communication issues required additional efforts."

"This authentication requirement blocks some patches from being pushed through Qualys, leaving them in a locked state."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its price is competitive in the market. Compared to other solutions like Rapid7, Qualys offers a favorable price point and robust features."

"Pricing for Qualys Patch Management is moderate."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing is competitive."

"The pricing is fair and within our budget."

"From what I have heard, Qualys Patch Management is pricey, which is a main barrier to entry. Another aspect that I do not like about Qualys is that they do not add new patch management functionalities to the existing package. It is a separate SKU, so you have to pay more money."

"While the cost of Qualys Patch Management is slightly high compared to alternative tools, it is not excessively expensive."

"Qualys Patch Management's pricing could be more competitive, as it presents a significant obstacle for many companies who find it unaffordable."

"I'm unaware of Qualys' exact price, but it's more expensive than Nessus. With technological products, you need to pay to get the best."

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?

Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?

We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?

I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys Patch Management?

Regarding the pricing aspects, I do not know the exact costs because we are not responsible for the procurement, but I can indicate around a 60% increase in revenue.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys Patch Management?

I think the schedules applied sometimes take longer; if the system can perform this work faster, it would be very helpful. Currently, with the latest version of Qualys Patch Management, I do not th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys Patch Management?

We are working with patch management for Ivanti, using it for patch management on workstations as well as servers. From Qualys perspective, we have performed VMDR, using PM, CA, Cloud Agent, and CA...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Scappman vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Competitors

BigFix vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 12% of the time

Patch My PC vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 12% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Compared 9% of the time

More Qualys TruRisk Eliminate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

July 2026

Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

July 2026

Download Qualys TruRisk Eliminate product report

Overview

Ivanti Security Controls delivers a reliable, stable setup for managing and installing upgrades and applications, featuring agentless operation and comprehensive reporting. It's preferred by data centers for efficiently addressing vulnerabilities through agentless solutions and backend scripting.

Ivanti Security Controls is instrumental in deploying updates to servers and workstations, effectively managing Microsoft and non-Microsoft patches. Teams leverage its centralized console for efficiency, conducting vulnerability scans and deploying patches based on detected issues. Users appreciate its responsive support and backend scripting capabilities, finding it essential for streamlining patching tasks and addressing vulnerabilities. Areas for improvement include cloud capabilities, logging, and scalability, with users seeking more intuitive report designs, enhanced documentation, and improved application management. Error messages during Windows upgrades need clarity, and more visibility in asset management is desired.

What are the most important features of Ivanti Security Controls?

Agentless Operation: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing operational efficiency.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers in-depth insights into security status and system vulnerabilities.
Patch and Asset Management: Simplifies the management of software updates and inventory tracking.
Credential Management: Ensures secure handling of sensitive access information.
PowerShell Script Execution: Allows automated tasks and customized scripting for tailored solutions.

What benefits should users look for in Ivanti Security Controls?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines update processes, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Security: Improves system safety by addressing vulnerabilities quickly.
Responsive Support: Assists quickly in troubleshooting and resolving user issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing updates and patches across systems.
Visibility into Vulnerabilities: Provides insights to tackle potential security threats effectively.

Ivanti Security Controls sees extensive use in industries requiring robust patch management and vulnerability scanning, notably in data centers where maintaining security and efficiency is critical. Its ability to deploy updates seamlessly makes it a valuable tool for sectors focused on IT infrastructure management.

Ivanti

Qualys Patch Management offers asset visibility, risk-based prioritization, and automation to enhance security. It integrates with VMDR for vulnerability prioritization, ensuring efficient patch deployment and reduced manual effort.

Qualys Patch Management focuses on automating patch deployment and bridging the gap between vulnerability identification and resolution. It supports Windows and Linux servers, providing real-time assessments and comprehensive reporting. The integration with VMDR prioritizes risks efficiently, promoting collaboration between IT and security teams. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows, improved vulnerability response times, and enhanced remote management.

What are the key features of Qualys Patch Management?

Asset Visibility: Provides precise tracking of all assets across environments.
Risk-Based Prioritization: Enables prioritization based on vulnerability risk level.
Automation: Streamlines patch deployment to reduce manual workload.
VMDR Integration: Integrates with VMDR for efficient vulnerability management.
Real-Time Assessments: Offers immediate analysis and feedback on patches.

What benefits can organizations expect from Qualys Patch Management?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces vulnerabilities across systems.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines workflows for faster resolutions.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes manual efforts, reducing associated costs.
Cross-Department Collaboration: Enhances communication between IT and security.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Qualys Patch Management is pivotal for maintaining stringent security standards. It helps organizations quickly address vulnerabilities, crucial in sectors that handle sensitive data. The ability to integrate with existing systems ensures minimal disruption and maximizes resource efficiency.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

June 2026

Free Report: Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.