No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: Ivanti
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include NinjaOne, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and BigFix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive patch management, efficient threat detection, and an intuitive user interface, delivering robust security solutions that enhance organizational protection and streamline IT operations seamlessly.

Ivanti Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Ivanti, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in remote monitoring and automation, appealing to those seeking efficient device management. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] emphasizes robust patch management and security, ideal for security-centric environments requiring comprehensive protection. While NinjaOne offers competitive pricing, Ivanti justifies its investment through specialized security features.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. NinjaOne Report
NinjaOne offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] has a more complex installation process that potentially increases costs. The simplicity of NinjaOne's setup contrasts with the more involved approach required for Ivanti Security Controls [...
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] has a more complex installation process that potentially increases costs. The simplicity of NinjaOne's setup contrasts with the more involved approach required for Ivanti Security Controls [...
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in integration and scalability, ideal for Microsoft-reliant environments. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] focuses on enhanced security features, appealing to organizations with stringent security needs. Each offers specific advantages, emphasizing either integration or security capabilities based on requirements.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager generally incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Ivanti Security Controls, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager generally incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Ivanti Security Controls, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in comprehensive endpoint visibility and automation of patch deployment, offering extensive compliance capabilities. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] focuses on robust vulnerability management and cross-platform patching integration, appealing to those valuing simplicity and rapid implementation.
Download BigFix vs. Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Report
BigFix setup costs are higher with comprehensive features, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] requires lower initial investment but offers fewer functionalities.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix setup costs are higher with comprehensive features, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] requires lower initial investment but offers fewer functionalities.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management
4.5 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] is favored for its user-friendly setup and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those seeking rapid deployment and straightforward pricing. In comparison, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers extensive features and robust asset visibility, ideal for complex environments needing comprehensive asset protection.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers a straightforward setup process with predictable costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a scalable setup with varying expenses depending on configuration and requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers a straightforward setup process with predictable costs, while Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides a scalable setup with varying expenses depending on configuration and requirements.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
Atera offers cost-effective IT management with remote monitoring and automation, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] provides robust security features, such as vulnerability scanning and patch management, making it ideal for companies prioritizing comprehensive security solutions.
Download Atera vs. Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Report
Atera offers lower setup costs compared to Ivanti Security Controls [EOL], making it a cost-effective choice, while Ivanti Security Controls provides robust initial setup features despite its higher pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Atera offers lower setup costs compared to Ivanti Security Controls [EOL], making it a cost-effective choice, while Ivanti Security Controls provides robust initial setup features despite its higher pricing.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers competitive pricing and effective patch management, ideal for budget-focused environments. In comparison, Vicarius vRx provides superior feature depth with proactive threat detection and real-time monitoring, appealing to those prioritizing advanced functionality despite higher initial investments.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Vicarius vRx Report
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] has a complex and high setup cost, while Vicarius vRx offers a more straightforward and lower-cost setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] has a complex and high setup cost, while Vicarius vRx offers a more straightforward and lower-cost setup option.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA)
4.4 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in affordability and customer support, appealing to budget-minded tech buyers. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls offers superior security features, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing robust security over lower costs and instant ROI.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs higher setup costs, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference between the two in the implementation phase.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs higher setup costs, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a clear cost difference between the two in the implementation phase.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Automox
4.4 out of 5
Automox offers competitive pricing and simplicity, appealing to cost-conscious buyers who prioritize ease of use and quick deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] provides a comprehensive feature set with robust security capabilities, attracting organizations with complex security needs and flexible deployment preferences.
Download Automox vs. Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Report
Automox offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] may involve higher setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Automox offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] may involve higher setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform
4.8 out of 5
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform excels in endpoint management and rapid deployment, appealing to organizations seeking quick ROI and streamlined processes. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] attracts those prioritizing comprehensive patch management and security compliance in larger, complex IT environments.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Report
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform offers a straightforward setup process, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] requires more complex configuration, highlighting a notable difference in installation ease.
View comparison
Pricing
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform offers a straightforward setup process, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] requires more complex configuration, highlighting a notable difference in installation ease.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services offers seamless integration for managing Windows updates efficiently. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] provides advanced security features, including vulnerability scanning, requiring more setup but delivering extensive capabilities. Ivanti is more costly, but its comprehensive features justify the investment.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services offers a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Security Controls. Ivanti Security Controls provides comprehensive security functionalities, which may justify its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services offers a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Security Controls. Ivanti Security Controls provides comprehensive security functionalities, which may justify its higher initial investment.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective automation and efficient deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] appeals with its extensive security features and flexibility, offering broader long-term benefits despite higher initial costs.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a cost-effective setup, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] incurs higher setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a cost-effective setup, while Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] incurs higher setup costs.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Qualys TruRisk Eliminate
4.4 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers efficient security patch management and budget-friendly pricing. In comparison, Qualys Patch Management provides superior scanning capabilities and seamless integration, appealing to those seeking enhanced security features despite higher initial costs. Qualys's cloud architecture supports strategic investments for comprehensive defense.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Qualys TruRisk Eliminate Report
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] requires a higher initial setup cost, while Qualys Patch Management offers a more economical setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] requires a higher initial setup cost, while Qualys Patch Management offers a more economical setup.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] excels in patch management and endpoint security, appealing to businesses requiring focused security solutions. In comparison, Scalefusion offers superior mobile device management and user-friendly deployment, attracting organizations seeking diverse device management capabilities with quick setup and competitive pricing.
Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] vs. Scalefusion Report
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] has a straightforward setup cost enabling quick deployment, while Scalefusion requires a more detailed initial configuration process, highlighting significant differences in setup complexity between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] has a straightforward setup cost enabling quick deployment, while Scalefusion requires a more detailed initial configuration process, highlighting significant differences in setup complexity between the solutions.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
GFI LanGuard excels in pricing and support, ideal for budget-conscious buyers with its straightforward deployment. In comparison, Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers advanced features justifying its cost, appealing to those needing comprehensive security and are prepared for a more resource-intensive setup.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Report
GFI LanGuard offers lower setup costs compared to Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]. Ivanti's setup requires a more substantial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
GFI LanGuard offers lower setup costs compared to Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]. Ivanti's setup requires a more substantial investment.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
PDQ Deploy
1 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
PDQ Deploy
1 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] offers robust security with strong patch management, ideal for organizations prioritizing comprehensive protection. In comparison, PDQ Deploy excels in efficient software deployment, appealing to those seeking streamlined and cost-effective application delivery with quick ROI.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] involves a higher upfront setup cost, while PDQ Deploy offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, positioning it as the cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] involves a higher upfront setup cost, while PDQ Deploy offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, positioning it as the cost-effective option.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Scappman
1 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Logo
Scappman
1 out of 5
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] is known for comprehensive patch management and vulnerability assessment. In comparison, Scappman excels with its cloud-native features and AI-driven automation, appealing for modern IT environments seeking ease of integration and cost-effective solutions.
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] involves a higher setup cost, whereas Scappman is noted for being more cost-effective during the initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] involves a higher setup cost, whereas Scappman is noted for being more cost-effective during the initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements.

Related categories

Patch Management
Help Desk Software
Network Monitoring Software