GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GFI and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Additionally, 81% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

GFI LanGuard

Read 11 GFI LanGuard reviews

2,388 Views
2,364 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Read 4 Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

GFI LanGuard

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

GFI LanGuard and Ivanti Security Controls compete in security management tools. GFI LanGuard is preferred for pricing and support, while Ivanti Security Controls offers robust functionality.

Features: GFI LanGuard provides network vulnerability detection, patch management, and reporting capabilities. Ivanti Security Controls offers risk assessment, application whitelisting, and comprehensive security control scopes.

Room for Improvement: GFI LanGuard could enhance third-party patch support, expand reporting features, and improve integration with more systems. Ivanti Security Controls could streamline reporting configuration, improve agentless deployment feedback, and simplify its extensive feature usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Security Controls offers a flexible deployment model with responsive customer service, aiding complex environments. GFI LanGuard's deployment is straightforward with accessible service, ideal for simpler setups.

Pricing and ROI: GFI LanGuard offers a lower setup cost with favorable ROI for budget-conscious organizations. Ivanti Security Controls requires a higher initial investment but promises higher long-term ROI through comprehensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Patch Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (15th)

Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Thanu Kishore

Technical Executive at Satcom Infotech

Effective patch management boosts network security and enhances compliance reporting

The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come. If a customer has their own cloud, we can host it there, but the SaaS model is not available, and most companies are requesting the SaaS model for patch management. GFI LanGuard is a good competitor in the market and is popular in my region. We get many leads and numerous requirements for patch management, but most companies ask for the SaaS model, which creates challenges. Third-party app integration needs to be increased in GFI LanGuard. It shouldn't be limited to 30 or 40 applications because there are many applications being used. Instead of manually patching everything, if those patches are included in the product, it would be easier for automatic patching.

Read full review

Chethan R

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Has reduced hardware strain through agentless patching and improved asset visibility

This solution does not have capability of managing applications. It is only used for asset management and patch management. Regarding analytics for Ivanti Security Controls, it does not have extensive capabilities. It is a basic tool from Ivanti for scanning and deploying. It does not have analytics features such as EDR or security tools available in the market. It only has capability to check missing patches, find them, and deploy them. When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects. The asset management in Ivanti Security Controls needs more visibility. Additionally, it can be improved to handle in-house applications, which currently cannot be installed. It can only handle existing applications, unlike Ivanti's Endpoint Manager. It should have additional features in this area that need improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful features of GFI LanGuard are vulnerability assessment and patching solutions."

"I use GFI LanGuard to save bandwidth and provide protection from attacks."

"The most valuable features of GFI LanGuard are the vulnerability assessment, it provides us with substantial insight into what applications are running on the endpoint systems and what vulnerabilities are there in the running applications. The second would be the assets tracking. I'm able to see in the network whether my endpoint server is operating and if all the other IT equipment is running in the environment. Additionally, GFI LanGuard is not heavy on system resources. It gives a competitive advantage over others."

"I was previously using ManageEngine and we switched to GFI LanGuard because it was less expensive, had the same feature sets, and an additional vulnerability assessment feature."

"I like that the solution can block users from unnecessarily putting devices on the network."

"The visibility that it provides to the administrator is very good."

"It is helpful to patch and scan vulnerabilities."

"The solution is easy to use and integrates well with other operating systems."

More GFI LanGuard pros

"Ivanti Security Controls is a better solution than SCCM."

"What has been most valuable is the ability to manage, restore and install upgrades and applications. We scan PCs and server and receive results."

"Technical support is helpful and responsive."

"Ivanti Security Controls is an agentless tool which means we do not need to install any agent on the server or endpoint, and through agentless capabilities, it can install software, install patches, and control over the server, including asset management."

Cons

"The version we are using only allows one person to use it at a time and does not allow multi-users."

"If GFI LanGuard had a cloud version it would be better for people that are working from home."

"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding more modules, such as asset control or asset inventory."

"GFI LanGuard can improve by adding asset tracking."

"GFI LanGuard could improve the rollback feature. If we have installed the wrong we have had some issues with the rollback function. Additionally, more input from GFI LanGuard for the custom software push install."

"The product is currently on-premise, and I think the cloud option is still yet to come."

"GFI LanGuard has some technical limitations with machines."

More GFI LanGuard cons

"For the Windows upgrade, the errors we experience are not clear. We see a time out error but do not know the reason. We would like to know the root cause."

"When it comes to reports, compliance reports or similar types of reports are not user-friendly. Expertise is required for handling these aspects."

"It should be more scalable."

"Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing of GFI LanGuard a four out of five."

"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

"GFI LanGuard isn't expensive."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate the price as a four."

"GFI LanGuard cost approximately $1,000 annually to use the solution."

"We are a gold partner and we receive favorable discounts. The price of GFI LanGuard is competitive. When you evaluate other solutions, such as ManageEngine."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Photography Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GFI LanGuard?

I have not encountered the pricing aspect since I am from the technical side; only the sales team handles the pricing part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GFI LanGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GFI LanGuard?

My experience with GFI LanGuard involves patch management where, whenever we visit customers, they request patches for both third-party applications and OS systems. When it is on-premise, we can pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Security Controls?

Ivanti Security Controls is a powerful product, but it has quite a steep learning curve. There is quite a lot to learn, though it proves to be very powerful if you put in the time to learn how to u...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Security Controls?

We are using Ivanti Security Controls for deploying Windows updates to Windows servers.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Security Controls?

I am currently working with Ivanti Security Controls as a customer. I think Ivanti Security Controls is an effective product for this purpose. I would give tech support for Ivanti Security Controls...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 8% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 7% of the time

NinjaOne vs GFI LanGuard

Compared 7% of the time

More GFI LanGuard Competitors

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

NinjaOne vs Ivanti Security Controls [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GFI LanGuard

October 2026

Download GFI LanGuard product report

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

October 2026

Download Ivanti Security Controls [EOL] product report

Also Known As

LanGuard

No data available

Overview

GFI LanGuard provides robust tools for patch management, vulnerability assessment, and asset tracking, helping organizations maintain secure network environments.

GFI LanGuard is used by companies to ensure that networks are patched, secure, and compliant. Its features offer visibility into network components and allow users to monitor and safeguard endpoint devices, manage updates, and scan for vulnerabilities. The tool integrates well across operating systems, providing a seamless approach to network management. However, there is room for enhancing Linux support, asset tracking, and extending functions beyond the local network.

What are the key features of GFI LanGuard?

Patch Management: Manages and automates patch updates for both operating systems and third-party applications.
Vulnerability Assessment: Identifies potential vulnerabilities in network systems to enhance security measures.
Asset Tracking: Provides insights into network components and running applications.
Integration: Compatible with different operating systems, enhancing device control and security.
Email Spam Feature: Offers email and web monitoring to protect against spam and cyber threats.

What user benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: By addressing vulnerabilities, it minimizes security risks.
Efficiency: Enhances system resource use, reducing time and labor costs.
Enhanced Control: Allows prevention of unauthorized devices and greater endpoint security.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides detailed insights into network activity and conditions.

In industries like finance and healthcare, GFI LanGuard aids in maintaining compliance by ensuring that systems are updated regularly and remain secure from intrusion. Whether deployed on-premise or in the cloud, it supports organizations in monitoring network activities, protecting data, and managing software installations effectively.

GFI

Ivanti Security Controls delivers a reliable, stable setup for managing and installing upgrades and applications, featuring agentless operation and comprehensive reporting. It's preferred by data centers for efficiently addressing vulnerabilities through agentless solutions and backend scripting.

Ivanti Security Controls is instrumental in deploying updates to servers and workstations, effectively managing Microsoft and non-Microsoft patches. Teams leverage its centralized console for efficiency, conducting vulnerability scans and deploying patches based on detected issues. Users appreciate its responsive support and backend scripting capabilities, finding it essential for streamlining patching tasks and addressing vulnerabilities. Areas for improvement include cloud capabilities, logging, and scalability, with users seeking more intuitive report designs, enhanced documentation, and improved application management. Error messages during Windows upgrades need clarity, and more visibility in asset management is desired.

What are the most important features of Ivanti Security Controls?

Agentless Operation: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing operational efficiency.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers in-depth insights into security status and system vulnerabilities.
Patch and Asset Management: Simplifies the management of software updates and inventory tracking.
Credential Management: Ensures secure handling of sensitive access information.
PowerShell Script Execution: Allows automated tasks and customized scripting for tailored solutions.

What benefits should users look for in Ivanti Security Controls?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines update processes, saving time and resources.
Enhanced Security: Improves system safety by addressing vulnerabilities quickly.
Responsive Support: Assists quickly in troubleshooting and resolving user issues.
Centralized Management: Offers a unified platform for managing updates and patches across systems.
Visibility into Vulnerabilities: Provides insights to tackle potential security threats effectively.

Ivanti Security Controls sees extensive use in industries requiring robust patch management and vulnerability scanning, notably in data centers where maintaining security and efficiency is critical. Its ability to deploy updates seamlessly makes it a valuable tool for sectors focused on IT infrastructure management.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, Ivanti and others in Patch Management. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.