JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Zend PHP Engine comparison

Red Hat and Zend are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Red Hat is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Zend is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Red Hat holds a 8.6% mindshare in AIS, compared to Zend’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zend users who would recommend it.

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 8 JBoss Enterprise Application Platform reviews

1,146 Views
1,146 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Zend PHP Engine

Read 11 Zend PHP Engine reviews

462 Views
462 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Zend PHP Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Zend PHP Engine and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform compete in the enterprise application sector. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform holds an edge due to its robust features despite its higher cost.

Features: Zend PHP Engine stands out for PHP optimization, seamless database integration, and enhanced web application performance. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is notable for comprehensive Java EE capabilities, scalability for enterprise applications, and powerful middleware solutions.

Room for Improvement: Zend PHP Engine can benefit from broader language support, more advanced analytical tools, and enhanced global reach. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform could improve with simplified deployment processes, reduced cost structures, and more user-friendly documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zend PHP Engine offers straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, ensuring quick setup and ongoing assistance. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, while more complex to deploy, provides an extensive toolset for enterprise management and extensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Zend PHP Engine features lower setup costs, ensuring a quicker return on investment for businesses focusing on optimized web applications. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform requires a higher initial investment, justified by long-term benefits in scalability and enterprise-grade features.

To learn more, read our detailed JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Zend PHP Engine Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Zend PHP Engine

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JBoss Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zend PHP Engine

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is 8.6%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zend PHP Engine is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Gustavo Magni

lead architect at Sys Manager

Stable solution with an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for the deployment of Java-based applications The solution helps my organization with simple and fast deployments. The solution is easy to configure and deploy. The solution's architecture needs improvement. Also, there could be more integration with container platforms. We…

Read full review

SatyendraGupta

External Consultant (Digital Tool Developer and Intervention Specialist) at IQVIA

The fact that it is available open-source is the best feature

The fact that it is available open-source is the best feature. A general scripting language should be further developed and should be embedded into it. I have been Zend PHP Engine for nine years. Multiple people are using the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."

"The solution is quite stable."

"Its technical support is excellent."

"The most valuable aspect of JBoss EAP is its support for clustering and load balancing, which is essential for our applications that serve multiple users simultaneously."

"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform works very well."

"It's convenient and barebone."

"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."

"This solution is really easy for me to use."

"Offers a complete environment to develop PHP applications. It is valuable because it allows you to have a complete stack (PHP, MySQL, Zend Server) enabling the building of a development environment, and to deploy to the production system."

"The cache modules that Zend provides have been able to optimize and accelerate the loading of the pages when there was exponential growth in data volume and quantity of requests. At the same time, the monitoring console allowed us to have a real-time understanding of the resources and to make decisions when they were at the limit."

"The fact that it is available open-source is the best feature."

"Faster web app implementation, when PHP dev is required by customers."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the speed at which it compiles and sends the dynamic cache."

"The Zend Framework provides an easy, open source way to produce coding based on the needs of our customers."

"Zend PHP Engine is a good tool for developing and collecting data, offering strong performance."

More Zend PHP Engine pros

Cons

"Sometimes, I observe the memory usage at 100% for the server, and this issue could be improved."

"Its architecture needs improvement."

"A graphic user interface can be added."

"This solution needs better management UI."

"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."

"Lacks some functional requirements."

"Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain."

"The solution can be quicker."

"Integrating AI tools would make PHP more competitive, as other tools already have AI features."

"A general scripting language should be further developed and should be embedded into it."

"The main area that Zend needs to improve is to support asynchronous programming tasks, which is facilitated in PHP 7, but not at the same degree as HHVM."

"In terms of improvement, it doesn't support concurrent processing. When we want to process anything on a concurrent basis, we have to divide it into a number of things, like a queue, or we have to run it using Cron jobs. We would like to have the capability to run any thread or process in parallel."

"The process of installing and configuring the product is a bit complex and could be improved."

"SQL queries have always been an issue with PHP, especially if you use large tables, which require caution from the side of the developer."

"Zend PHP Engine needs to improve the loading time of its libraries and make it faster."

More Zend PHP Engine cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While I am not directly involved with the financial aspects, JBoss is known for its reasonable subscription pricing. Potential users should consider whether the cost aligns with their budget and requirements."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The Zend PHP engine is open source technology, so there's no need for us to worry about licensing or other costs."

"The solution is open source and you just pay for the server cost."

"Zend PHP Engine is not an expensive solution."

"Its pricing depends on the number of users."

"No problem with pricing and licensing, as tools are open source. You have to consider training cost, mindset setup cost, as part of the TCO."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

The solution is quite stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

The memory usage and memory RAM could be improved. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform could improve the use of memory on a server. Sometimes, I observe the memory usage at 100% for the server, a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JBoss Enterprise Application Platform?

I deploy the application as .war or .ear, which is part of Java Enterprise. I use it for resources for the server, and I coordinate with the developer for deployment of the web application. In my j...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zend PHP Engine?

The fact that it is available open-source is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zend PHP Engine?

PHP is an open-source solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zend PHP Engine?

Integrating AI tools would make PHP more competitive, as other tools already have AI features.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 74% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 7% of the time

NGINX Plus vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 6% of the time

IBM BPM vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Competitors

Apache Web Server vs Zend PHP Engine

Compared 100% of the time

More Zend PHP Engine Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

August 2025

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform report

Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

August 2025

Download Zend PHP Engine product report

Also Known As

JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP

PHP Engine

Overview

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAPâs architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).

Red Hat

The Zend PHP Engine is designed to optimize PHP code and improve performance, making it a popular choice for web developers. It is easy to use, stable, does not require a lot of code, is open source, and only requires payment for server costs. The initial setup is straightforward, and there is no real need to set up the solution because it's built into the deployment.

Zend

Sample Customers

APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank

Cisco

Buyer's Guide

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Zend PHP Engine

July 2025

Free Report: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Zend PHP Engine

Find out what your peers are saying about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Zend PHP Engine and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Zend PHP Engine report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.