Oracle GlassFish vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the Application Server category. Oracle is ranked #11, while Red Hat is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Oracle holds a 3.8% mindshare in AppS, compared to Red Hat’s 13.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution.

Oracle GlassFish

Read 1 Oracle GlassFish review

465 Views
465 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Ap...

Read 32 Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) reviews

2,531 Views
2,531 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle GlassFish

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Ap...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Oracle GlassFish and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform are competing products in the domain of enterprise application servers. Oracle GlassFish is noted for its straightforward setup and cost-effectiveness, while Red Hat JBoss EAP stands out for its robust features that enhance scalability and enterprise-level reliability.

Features: Oracle GlassFish offers ease of use, quick deployment, and efficient integration with Java EE standards. Red Hat JBoss EAP provides superior scalability, advanced clustering capabilities, and wide language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle GlassFish provides an easy-start model ensuring a smooth deployment process. Red Hat JBoss EAP offers comprehensive documentation and support services, enriching the deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle GlassFish is recognized for low setup costs and promising ROI, appealing to budget-conscious entities. Red Hat JBoss EAP, with higher setup costs, delivers long-term ROI with scalable infrastructure and enhanced productivity features.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Server Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GlassFish

Ranking in Application Server

11th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Ap...

Ranking in Application Server

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle GlassFish is 3.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is 13.3%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)	13.3%
Oracle GlassFish	3.8%
Other	82.9%

Application Server

Featured Reviews

it_user517413

Technical Lead Developer

Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.

The products offers EE support. It offers ease of use. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.

Read full review

reviewer2788512

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Rapid deployments have streamlined containerized web apps but support response still needs improvement

The best features Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) offers are its integration into AWS services, which is very helpful in containerization and application of Kubernetes specifically, and its user interface is very easy to use; we can deploy WAR files within stipulated time and also schedule deployments at a particular time, and it is easy to run the pipelines and integrate it with Jenkins. The most valuable feature for my team is containerization and Jenkins integration because Jenkins integration helps us eradicate code smells and build pipeline reports, and it also supports continuous CI/CD pipelining, while this orchestration aids in a microservice architecture where we will be using different types for it. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) has positively impacted my organization by helping in quickly making web Spring Boot applications and Java-based applications, and it is very easy to adapt and learn, plus it is open source with nominal and affordable subscription plans.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The products offers EE support."

"The solution has flexibility and stability."

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"The product integrates well with Java applications."

"The stability is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"JBoss's configuration is straightforward and easy."

"It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable."

"We use JBoss mainly for application deployments and application servers."

"The tool's most beneficial feature is its scalability. People with limited technical knowledge can quickly grasp its functions with a brief introduction. The tool's ease of use makes it a plug-and-play solution, reducing the effort required to train users on its usage."

More Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) pros

Cons

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."

"You cannot compare Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) with WebSphere, for example, or with WebLogic, but from a peace of mind, it is fine."

"I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console."

"The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it. The documentation should be self-explanatory and guide users on how to utilize the tool."

"I think documentation may need improvement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)."

"The documentation could be better. When we have questions, we need to check multiple websites. There isn't one place listing a set of common problems and how to fix them."

"The product could be cheaper."

"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."

"The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."

More Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."

"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."

"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."

"It is an open-source solution."

"JBoss is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

More Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

29%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about JBoss?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?

The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was nominal, and with the right guidance, it could have saved a few more bucks. We can say that if we are charging around 0.75 cents per hour ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JBoss?

I think documentation may need improvement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP). Additionally, the support feature can be improved.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tomcat vs Oracle GlassFish

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Oracle GlassFish

Compared 20% of the time

IIS vs Oracle GlassFish

Compared 16% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle GlassFish

Compared 12% of the time

More Oracle GlassFish Competitors

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

Compared 17% of the time

Tomcat vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

Compared 16% of the time

IIS vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

Compared 8% of the time

TmaxSoft JEUS vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

Compared 6% of the time

More Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Server

February 2026

Download Oracle GlassFish product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)

January 2026

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) report

Download Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) product report

Also Known As

GlassFish

No data available

Overview

Oracle GlassFish Server is a robust open source platform that offers exhaustive and accessible documentation, intuitive administration and configuration features, interoperability with Microsoft Windows, feature-rich integration with NetBeans and Eclipse, and alignment with Oracle Solaris, OpenSolaris, and MySQL.

Oracle

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) provides scalable, secure, and reliable infrastructure for Java applications, offering high availability, modular architecture, and smooth integration with new technologies.

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is tailored for deploying and managing web and application servers, with a strong focus on Java applications, APIs, and core business systems. It ensures easy setup and cost-effectiveness, accommodating high availability and clustering enhancements like session replication via Infinispan. While managing configurations and deployments effectively, EAP facilitates flexible deployment modes and enhanced security using OpenID Connect. However, areas needing improvement include customization options, runtime diagnostics, integration capabilities, documentation, and technical support. Automation needs expansion, pricing options could be more competitive, and better alignment with Jakarta EE is suggested for modernization.

What are the standout features of Red Hat JBoss EAP?

Scalability: Efficiently handles increasing demands with ease.
Security: Features like OpenID Connect enhance protection.
Reliability: Ensures consistent performance and uptime.
Integration: Works seamlessly with new technologies and APIs.
Modular Architecture: Offers flexibility in deployment modes.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from using Red Hat JBoss EAP?

Cost-Effectiveness: Balances quality features with affordability.
High Availability: Provides robust clustering and session replication.
Community Support: Backed by active and knowledgeable community.

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) finds application across industries such as finance, web development, and enterprise middleware services. Its capabilities are demonstrated in managing banking transactions, supporting legacy systems, integrating with external APIs, and fulfilling enterprise needs in installation, configuration, automation, and security tasks.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

TravelMuse, Clarity Accounting

Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.