Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IIS vs Oracle GlassFish comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IIS
Ranking in Application Server
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (1st)
Oracle GlassFish
Ranking in Application Server
11th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of IIS is 6.9%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle GlassFish is 3.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IIS6.9%
Oracle GlassFish3.8%
Other89.3%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Natarajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at Atos
Designs and manages multiple websites while ensuring data backup and disaster recovery
I have experience with AWS, and I am most familiar with the server environment, as we just use the server environment and then use Microsoft products on an AWS environment. I have experience with Windows Server IIS, which I ran on my own on-premise data center. The website was developed and then hosted, and through IIS, we managed the servers. The manageability within the IIS environment is not very difficult. For server management, you need to ensure data backup, data restore, and you have a DR configured to keep the database intact. It was done on-premises, so I had no problem doing that. If you have to go to the cloud, then you should have the storage connected to the IIS server and also have a DR set up for that. I didn't use Microsoft Azure tools, but since it is a Microsoft product, Azure has all the portability, so you don't have to worry about compatibility on the cloud. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this solution a 10.
it_user517413 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Developer
Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
The products offers EE support. It offers ease of use. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of IIS is the database it provides."
"The product is easy to configure."
"The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."
"The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of IIS is it does not consume a lot of resources. It does not consume a lot of resources, such as memory."
"The solution is easy to use, easy to maintain and isn't too technical."
"The tool is very easy to use and efficient."
"This is definitely a stable solution."
"The products offers EE support."
 

Cons

"Having no support for other than a Microsoft environment and programming languages limits the usage of IIS in many cases."
"It lacks a few performance improvement tools."
"In the next release, the tool should be more easily integrated and configured with other provisions. The pricing should also be made cheaper since it's very expensive now."
"Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"Microsoft products can only work within the Windows environment, which limits their versatility."
"IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors. More details would be helpful. Additionally, the configuring of the IIS should be allowed through coding instead of the classic view."
"The only disadvantage I see is that the documentation is a bit difficult to find."
"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."
"The licensing cost is dependent on the usage."
"There is a license needed for the solution."
"The price is good."
"This solution comes included with Windows Server."
"I think it's part of the Windows Server, so you won't have any other costs to add in order to use the IIS service."
"The yearly licensing cost is very high. The solution is very expensive."
"The solution’s pricing is yearly. The pricing is affordable and not high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise22
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?
IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?
For the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IIS, as a Microsoft product, I didn't think much about separately purchasing an IIS product as it is part of Microsoft Windows. We bought a developmen...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Windows Server IIS
GlassFish
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute
TravelMuse, Clarity Accounting
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Red Hat, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: January 2026.
881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.