JRebel vs Jenkins comparison

Jenkins and Perforce are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Perforce is ranked #29. Jenkins holds a 9.1% mindshare in BA, compared to Perforce’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

7,083 Views
6,941 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

JRebel

Read 1 JRebel review

467 Views
458 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

JRebel

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JRebel and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub and others in Build Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JRebel

Ranking in Build Automation

29th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 9.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JRebel is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jenkins	9.1%
JRebel	1.0%
Other	89.9%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Jamshaid I

Principal Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Efficient resource allocation and robust workflow with autoscaling capabilities

In Kubernetes, we use node-based architecture with nodes and pods and follow practices like RBAC and rollback. Multiple pods can run concurrently. We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load.

Read full review

it_user177786

Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Easy to configure, works well, has 'free' options (like Social)

Easy to configure, works well, has 'free' options (like Social) It gets the used time for redeploy in a development environment really fast and of course that's a good point. Development environment I had a little problem in redeploying applications using a specific…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that there are multiple features, as we can abstract certain variables and then build our deployment routine while being able to do some abstraction onto the SSH connections."

"Potential deployment problems pop up almost instantly during the development process, and the developers are more confident about their committed code."

"The major benefit of using Jenkins is that it's a very secure way of deploying something to the cloud."

"The most valuable features of Jenkins are its ease of use and good plugins available, and you are able to connect to a lot of solutions."

"It is very useful for us to be able to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to connect with different tools and technologies."

"Has enabled full automation of the company."

"The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its open source."

More Jenkins pros

"Easy to configure, works well, has 'free' options (like Social)."

Cons

"I think an integrated help button, that respected the context of the change/work in hand, would be a worthwhile improvement."

"I sometimes face a bottleneck when installing the plugins on an offline machine. Mapping the dependencies and then installing the correct sequence of dependencies is a nightmare, and it took me two days to do it."

"For this solution to be a 10, it has to be a lot more stable. Maybe the public version of Jenkins is stable, but in our case it's not stable."

"The UI of Jenkins could improve."

"Many of the plugins needs to be streamlined, their terminology needs to be the same and some plugins should be split into multiple smaller plugins."

"Despite there being a whole lot of community input on the solution, nobody is providing professional services around it."

"The onboarding of Jenkins should be smoother, and it should have more pipelines available as it's deployed on many different servers."

"Polish for the user interface, stability of plugins beyond the very most commonly used ones."

More Jenkins cons

"I had a little problem in redeploying applications using a specific framework (reactor + spring) in a Maven multi-module project."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"We are using the freeware version of Jenkins."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"The tool is open-source."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing."

"It is an open source."

"There is no cost. It is open source."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	58

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jenkins?

I do not have any notes for improvement.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Bamboo vs JRebel

Compared 47% of the time

TeamCity vs JRebel

Compared 14% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs JRebel

Compared 9% of the time

More JRebel Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

June 2026

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

May 2026

Download JRebel product report

Also Known As

No data available

ZeroTurnaround JRebel

Overview

Jenkins is an open-source automation server known for its extensive plugin ecosystem and seamless integration with a broad range of tools, enhancing CI/CD processes.

As an automation server, Jenkins streamlines development workflows by managing continuous integration and deployment with powerful pipeline support and distributed build capabilities. Its strong community backbone and ease of use contribute to its ongoing appeal. While highly versatile, Jenkins can encounter scalability and plugin management issues, with areas like cloud integration and security needing attention. It supports automation for build, test, and deployment, ensuring smoother software delivery and infrastructure management across environments.

What are Jenkins's key features?

Extensive Plugin Ecosystem: Allows seamless tool integration.
Open-Source Nature: Backed by a strong community.
CI/CD Optimization: Streamlines development workflows.
Pipeline Support: Facilitates complex scripting.
Distributed Build Management: Efficiently handles multiple environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort.
Scalability: Adapts to growing project needs.
Integration Versatility: Works well with tools like Git.
Community Support: Offers practical solutions and resources.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex automation processes.

Jenkins is implemented in industries focused on continuous software delivery and infrastructure management, including technology firms, finance sectors needing robust deployment pipelines, and enterprise environments requiring complex workflow automation. Companies leverage its automation to enhance productivity and minimize errors in development processes.

Jenkins

JRebel streamlines Java application development by allowing developers to instantly see code changes without restarting their application, significantly enhancing productivity.

JRebel is designed for modern Java development environments, enabling seamless integration with existing tools and platforms. It minimizes downtime by eliminating the need for lengthy build and redeploy cycles, making development faster and more efficient. The solution supports a range of Java technologies, offering compatibility with popular frameworks and application servers, which allows developers to focus on coding instead of managing deployments.

What are the most valuable features of JRebel?

Instant Code Updates: Apply code changes without restarting Java applications.
Framework Support: Compatible with a wide variety of Java frameworks.
IDE Integration: Seamlessly integrates into major integrated development environments.
Streamlined Debugging: Simplifies the debugging process with quick visibility of code changes.

What benefits should you look for in user reviews?

Increased Productivity: Saves developers time by eliminating redeployment cycles.
Enhanced Efficiency: Accelerates development processes, leading to quicker project completion.
Improved Code Quality: Encourages more frequent testing and iteration by developers.

JRebel sees widespread adoption in technology-driven industries like finance and e-commerce, where rapid development cycles and minimal downtime are critical. Its ability to integrate smoothly with diverse tech stacks makes it a preferred choice for businesses aiming to deliver robust applications efficiently.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

MS Learning & Consulting, NetworkedAssets, Vaadin Ltd, Heliocentris, Result Group

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.