JIRA Service Management vs Samanage comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Atlassian and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Help Desk Software category. Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while SolarWinds is ranked #25. Additionally, 93% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Samanage and JIRA Service Management compete in IT service management. Samanage offers ease of use, while JIRA is notable for its robust features, appealing to those seeking comprehensive tools.

Features: Samanage offers IT asset management, incident management, and problem management. JIRA Service Management features include integration capabilities, a range of plugins, and advanced workflow management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Samanage is known for rapid deployment and accessible customer service with quick response times. JIRA Service Management requires detailed setup but benefits from Atlassian's support documentation and community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Samanage provides value with a low initial setup cost and quick ROI, suitable for smaller enterprises. JIRA Service Management offers potential long-term value with extensive capabilities for larger organizations despite a higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed JIRA Service Management vs. Samanage Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management vs. Samanage

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,654 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Meechai C.

Consult at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Detects incidents quickly, improves our SLA performance and solves issues faster

We mainly use it for incident logging. We'd like to add service request functionality, but we don't have the knowledge to configure the requests and the workflows properly. We'd like to integrate our workflows with the incident management, so we use it to manage our work better. We'd like to implement the service request feature. Right now, we just record everything as incidents. Some activities can take a long time, maybe one or two weeks. This makes it hard to maintain a good SLA, even if we work hard. So, response speed and workflow improvements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automation Anywhere has excellent features."

"It is a great solution."

"The benefits we get from automation include faster and more accurate matching, running 24x7."

"Automation Anywhere has been an integral part of this product's evolution in general. A hindrance that we were faced with was companies who did not have API integrations for Salesforce. This is where RPA and Automation Anywhere came in and helped us with integrating solutions which did not have API integrations within themselves. That's how we've evolved in the past two to three months."

"We were working on a system called AS 400. Automation Anywhere performed well on that old system. It handled complicated processes. I had to review different menus and screens and give resources, storage, and databases. That's complicated."

"If anyone is looking for an efficient automation tool, I definitely recommend Automation Anywhere because it is very helpful, even for non-technical people."

"I like all of the features, especially the MetaBot, REST API, and SAP DLL."

"We offer them a cost and time-effective solution for repeated and time-consuming processes, which surely help a lot in terms of improving quality."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"We previously used ITAM, BMC Remedy and some other tools, and JIRA Service Management is comparatively better."

"The dashboards in Jira have been the most useful feature."

"Anyone who is considering Jira Software, I would recommend they go with Jira Service Desk."

"I think that people should really go for it because of its ease of use."

"Jira Service Management has a workflow feature you can configure for your specific requirements. It also lets you efficiently manage service requests with team members."

"The automation feature in JIRA Service Management is beneficial, and that's yet to be available in ServiceNow. ServiceNow doesn't have the flexibility to automate processes."

"We can track, monitor, and get all the details we need from the end-user's point of view for any service request."

"For anyone considering JIRA Service Management, I would advise that it is an excellent project management tool suitable for product management across small to large scales."

More JIRA Service Management pros

"The solution has a great filtering feature."

"I would recommend Samanage from the IT support perspective because it's a great ticketing system and the only downside is the site shutdowns and the messy nature of the UI and UX."

"Samanage has not only taken over asset and inventory management, but it also has the ability to function across departments, making it easy for end users to submit help desk tickets for IT, HR, and Finance."

"The best part is the ability to keep records, especially incident records. It's easy to use the tool to store data and monitor it."

Cons

"In Mexico, where our company is based, we face issues regarding obtaining new licenses, as this has to be done through a third-party company."

"I would like to see more stability around scheduling a bot to run headless."

"One area where I can see room for improvement is the training material that is available."

"In order to score nine or ten, they still need to provide more flexibility and integration with other tools and options."

"Getting buy-in was a major challenge because of the various people not aware of the technologies moving and getting buy-in from top management is a challenge."

"Room for improvement is more on the IQ Bot side: How quickly we can adopt and deploy it?"

"For future prospects, this tool should 80 percent deal with neural networks, deep learning, and artificial intelligence and that has to be integrated a lot. As these are future skills, these integrations will help us take the tool to take to the next level."

"There is a dependency issue around the control room. If the control room is not working, the bots will not work."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"The pricing could be better."

"From the customer side, it's not friendly used compared to other competitors, like ServiceNow or BMC. It's also not fully ITSM management if you compare it with ServiceNow or BMC. They have a full model of ITSM. In BMC they have TrueSight, they have Discovery, which helps IT to discover IT equipment with a serial number, with the specs, capacity of the server."

"I think the performance can be better."

"The product could improve its asset management."

"I don't think the program is very scalable."

"Usability needs improvement. To configure it, you need to be well versed in Jira administration. It's not very intuitive."

"Technical support is not the best and could definitely be improved."

"What is lacking is the communication around these changes because we come across them almost by chance, and not because of any notification we've received."

More JIRA Service Management cons

"The system shuts down about once a month which is frustrating."

"There are definitely areas for improvement, but so far, so good."

"We've had some problems with the system shutting down about once a month. It sometimes takes five or 10 minutes to start working again but it can also take hours."

"The setting up process is not quite easy. It's quite difficult."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not know the price, but I am told that it is cheaper than UiPath."

"IQ Bots are very costly. It's not a sustainable bot for us as of now. We will look for better, alternate options for that."

"The pricing model can be a bit more flexible."

"We were paying approximately $30,000 for a year license."

"If I compare it with Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere is cheaper. Blue Prism is very costly. Automation Anywhere's pricing follows the market, not less and not more."

"They sell it by license, but if they could charge by case or by interaction, that might be better. Right now, it's expensive when you want to scale or use them for simple processes."

"UiPath is exceptionally more expensive than Automation Anywhere. UiPath is far ahead of its competition, but in terms of finances, Automation Anywhere offers better value and is more effective for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions."

"One of the things that will be good for the community will be to get the free version to download, which came out just a month ago called Community Edition. So, you can actually download it and try it for yourself."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"We have an annual license with JIRA Service Management, but it is billed monthly."

"For the people like us, the lower the price, the better. But when compared to other competitors, I think it's Jira's price is okay."

"This is pricey solution. Should we move to using all cloud solutions in our business, we may move to different tools that have multiple functionality versus having a solution for each area. This would be too pricey and we would need to replace Jira with a different solution that also offers other features."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price. It's competitively priced."

"We need a license because we have a higher number than the free part."

"It depends on the number of users but it starts at $20 per month per user. I would rate them a three out of five for pricing."

"Right now, there are only two of us who are both agents on the help desk and developers. We might be on the free version because we're less than three agents or users. I'm looking at Zephyr tests, which have a $10 a month flat rate, so right now, it is $10 a month. There are lots of add-ons. They do a free version, a standard version, and a premium version. In the last company, we started on $50 a month. By the time I left, we were paying $4,500 a month. That was mainly because we had 100 users on Confluence. I bought an add-on for Jira software for which we had 10 users, and that was $5 per user per month. It was costing me $500 a month, whereas it should only be $50 a month. I don't know if licensing fee has changed. I'd like our whole company to use it, but the big problem is the licensing because the Confluence side is what is really useful, but if I add 30 users to Confluence and then buy an extension for Jira software, I've got to pay for 30 licenses, even though I've only got two users in Jira software. It is the one big disadvantage of cloud software. You always have to pay for the number of seats regardless of which product you are on. This will probably severely limit how many people would use it because I'm not going to start paying $10 per user per month for a Jira software add-on when there are only two people using it."

"Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	161
Midsize Enterprise	82
Large Enterprise	558

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I als...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

I feel JIRA Service Management could be better if the APIs from the sponsoring team provided more support and flexibi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 11% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Atera vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 4% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

ServiceNow vs Samanage

Compared 10% of the time

Freshservice vs Samanage

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds Service Desk vs Samanage

Compared 5% of the time

ENSO AI vs Samanage

Compared 3% of the time

Folder HelpDesk vs Samanage

Compared 3% of the time

More Samanage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

September 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

September 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Help Desk Software

September 2026

Download Samanage product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Atlassian

Demo not available

SolarWinds

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Samanage is a cloud-based IT service management platform designed to streamline support operations and improve efficiency. It provides a user-friendly experience tailored for various industries.

Focused on enhancing IT operations, Samanage offers a range of tools that facilitate seamless service delivery and management. Its cloud-native architecture ensures scalability and reliability, while its intuitive design allows users to effectively handle incidents, changes, and assets without extensive training. This adaptability makes it a trusted choice for organizations looking to enhance their IT service management capabilities.

What are the key features of Samanage?

Incident Management: Quickly address and resolve support requests with streamlined processing.
Change Management: Manage changes with comprehensive tracking and implementation protocols.
Asset Management: Optimize the management of IT assets with real-time tracking and lifecycle insights.
Service Catalog: Provide a self-service portal with customizable service offerings.
Knowledge Base: Empower teams with accessible documentation and solutions for common issues.

What benefits can users expect from Samanage?

Improved Efficiency: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Cost Reduction: Optimize resource allocation and minimize downtime associated with IT issues.
Enhanced Scalability: Easily scale operations without disruptions, accommodating growth seamlessly.
User Satisfaction: Provide faster and more accurate support, leading to higher satisfaction scores.
Data-Driven Insights: Access actionable analytics to drive informed decision-making.

In industries like healthcare and education, Samanage is implemented to support critical IT infrastructure, ensuring reliable service delivery and compliance with industry-specific regulations. By integrating with existing systems, it enhances efficiency while maintaining a focus on security and user privacy.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

SXSW, PRA Group, Fandango, Inteva Products, Amherst College, Tensator

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management vs. Samanage

September 2026

Free Report: JIRA Service Management vs. Samanage

Find out what your peers are saying about JIRA Service Management vs. Samanage and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JIRA Service Management vs. Samanage report.

See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.