JIRA Service Management vs Xurrent comparison

Read 4 Xurrent reviews

937 Views
928 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JIRA Service Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 29, 2025

JIRA Service Management and Xurrent compete in the IT service management solutions space. JIRA Service Management has an advantage with its integration options, while Xurrent leads with its straightforward setup.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers agile project management tools, extensive integration capabilities, and customizable workflows. Xurrent provides advanced automation features, easy-to-use dashboards, and streamlined processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management facilitates a comprehensive deployment approach with robust support resources, providing flexibility and scalability. Xurrent offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support, appealing to companies requiring quick implementation and minimal downtime.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management has a flexible pricing model that accommodates varying business needs, balancing cost and functionality. Xurrent provides competitive pricing and rapid ROI through its automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed JIRA Service Management vs. Xurrent Report (Updated: December 2025).

JIRA Service Management vs. Xurrent

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Service Management

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (2nd)

Xurrent

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 7.3%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Xurrent is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Service Management (ITSM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JIRA Service Management	7.3%
Xurrent	1.3%
Other	91.4%

IT Service Management (ITSM)

Featured Reviews

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Edward Carbutt

Executive Director at Marval Software

Offers multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, requires minimal configuration and no-code deployment

We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity. However, for most users, the product will do what they need. It's only when you have mature service management processes and need deeper integrations at the process level that you might encounter some limitations. But for less mature needs, 4me works well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Developing processes is easy and user-friendly."

"We have an Agile environment and using Jira makes it easy to adhere to Agile best practices."

"The most valuable features are the flexibility of defining your own workflows and automation around the workflows, and the integration with the gate or any repository."

"JIRA Service Management provides comprehensive data management, different views with customizable dashboards, a detailed level of customization from items to workflows to roles and teams, and very flexible integration through the Atlassian marketplace plugins."

"Using JIRA simplifies tracking issues and updates."

"The automation feature in JIRA Service Management is beneficial, and that's yet to be available in ServiceNow. ServiceNow doesn't have the flexibility to automate processes."

"Allows customized processes for our service contracts."

"The customer portal with connection with our knowledge base has been most valuable."

More JIRA Service Management pros

"The solution is highly stable."

"I like their request management as well as their project management."

"It offers a comprehensive set of features without requiring additional payments for each feature."

"The multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, is the best feature. It is a really well-thought, designed, and developed part of this product."

Cons

"The documentation needs improving, it's difficult to find specific procedures."

"When you raise a ticket with Jira, there's no ability to see your other JIRA tickets."

"Jira Service Management is expensive and not worth the money compared to monday.com."

"In general, JIRA has no relation to customers or financials. Therefore, marketplace add-ons are needed to make it work for customer-facing systems."

"Its UI is a bit overwhelming for new users. That has been the problem with Jira for a long time. If they could put some fields that we could use to simplify the UI, it would be good."

"From the customer side, it's not friendly used compared to other competitors, like ServiceNow or BMC. It's also not fully ITSM management if you compare it with ServiceNow or BMC. They have a full model of ITSM. In BMC they have TrueSight, they have Discovery, which helps IT to discover IT equipment with a serial number, with the specs, capacity of the server."

"The initial setup is very complex."

"The initial setup of JIRA Service Management can be complex for new users. There is a lot of configuration."

More JIRA Service Management cons

"Asset Discovery is a feature that should be added."

"We would like to be able to customize and brand the solution, or at least the majority of its features and dashboards, particularly those that will be used by a large number of people."

"We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity."

"One area where I believe there's room for improvement in the 4me system is the absence of an asset discovery tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is becoming expensive and it should be reduced."

"Costs are about $50 per user per year. JIRA is sold in user tiers of 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 2000, 10,000, and unlimited users. It is bad when you have 51 users then the price is based on that 100 user tier. Users at 100 will be the most cost effective."

"Right now, there are only two of us who are both agents on the help desk and developers. We might be on the free version because we're less than three agents or users. I'm looking at Zephyr tests, which have a $10 a month flat rate, so right now, it is $10 a month. There are lots of add-ons. They do a free version, a standard version, and a premium version. In the last company, we started on $50 a month. By the time I left, we were paying $4,500 a month. That was mainly because we had 100 users on Confluence. I bought an add-on for Jira software for which we had 10 users, and that was $5 per user per month. It was costing me $500 a month, whereas it should only be $50 a month. I don't know if licensing fee has changed. I'd like our whole company to use it, but the big problem is the licensing because the Confluence side is what is really useful, but if I add 30 users to Confluence and then buy an extension for Jira software, I've got to pay for 30 licenses, even though I've only got two users in Jira software. It is the one big disadvantage of cloud software. You always have to pay for the number of seats regardless of which product you are on. This will probably severely limit how many people would use it because I'm not going to start paying $10 per user per month for a Jira software add-on when there are only two people using it."

"Actually in Iran we don't have copyright or intellectual property, so we can use JIRA for free."

"JSM's pricing is one of the best, starting at around $10 per user, per month, with volume discounts available."

"The price for JIRA Service Management is reasonable and cheaper than other ITSM solutions, but the licensing model is different, so you cannot compare it with other solutions. Overall, the pricing for the solution is acceptable."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price. It's competitively priced."

"Licensing can become quite expensive."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

"The licensing costs on the website are about $60 for pay-as-you-go. And then it decreases based on volume discounts or something."

"This pricing falls on the lower end of the spectrum, making it a cost-effective option."

"The pricing is expensive."

"It is the most affordable because it is priced per month per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

What do you like most about JIRA Service Management?

JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

The price is actually reasonable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for 4me?

The pricing is expensive. I rate it an eight out of ten.

What needs improvement with 4me?

Asset Discovery is a feature that should be added.

What is your primary use case for 4me?

The solution is used for enterprise management.

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 9% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

ServiceNow vs Xurrent

Compared 40% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs Xurrent

Compared 21% of the time

SysAid vs Xurrent

Compared 9% of the time

HaloITSM vs Xurrent

Compared 7% of the time

Freshservice vs Xurrent

Compared 7% of the time

More Xurrent Competitors

Product Reports

Download JIRA Service Management product report

JIRA Service Management

January 2026

Download Xurrent product report

January 2026

Also Known As

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

4me

Overview

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Xurrent offers a dynamic platform catering to modern enterprise requirements, focusing on effective and actionable insights to drive growth and streamline operations.

Xurrent engages its users by providing robust capabilities that enhance data analytics, automation, and collaboration for businesses. Its versatile nature serves industries aiming to optimize performance and efficiency, leveraging cutting-edge technology to address ever-evolving demands. With an integrated approach, Xurrent supports in-depth analysis and seamless communication to help businesses adapt and succeed.

What features does Xurrent have?

Advanced Analytics: Delivers comprehensive data analysis for strategic decision-making.
Automation Tools: Streamlines repetitive tasks, improving efficiency.
Collaboration Capabilities: Enhances team communication and project coordination.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides user-specific insights and data visualization.
Security Layers: Ensures data integrity and protection.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual tasks through automation.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Empowers data-driven strategies with real-time insights.
Cost Savings: Lowers operational expenses by optimizing resource allocation.
Scalability: Offers flexibility to grow alongside business needs.
Data Security: Protects against data breaches and ensures compliance.

Xurrent finds significant application in industries such as finance and healthcare, where data precision and efficiency are crucial. In finance, it supports portfolio management and trading analytics, while in healthcare, it aids in patient data management and operational excellence. Its adaptability ensures it serves diverse industry requirements effectively.

Sample Customers

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

Information Not Available