Xurrent offers a dynamic platform catering to modern enterprise requirements, focusing on effective and actionable insights to drive growth and streamline operations.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Xurrent | 1.2% |
| ServiceNow | 13.9% |
| JIRA Service Management | 6.8% |
| Other | 78.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | IT Service Management (ITSM) | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Xurrent vs ServiceNow | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Xurrent vs JIRA Service Management | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Xurrent vs ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus | Jun 23, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceNow | 4.3 | 13.9% | 92% | 231 interviewsAdd to research |
| Zendesk | 4.0 | 4.8% | 91% | 69 interviewsAdd to research |
Xurrent engages its users by providing robust capabilities that enhance data analytics, automation, and collaboration for businesses. Its versatile nature serves industries aiming to optimize performance and efficiency, leveraging cutting-edge technology to address ever-evolving demands. With an integrated approach, Xurrent supports in-depth analysis and seamless communication to help businesses adapt and succeed.
What features does Xurrent have?Xurrent finds significant application in industries such as finance and healthcare, where data precision and efficiency are crucial. In finance, it supports portfolio management and trading analytics, while in healthcare, it aids in patient data management and operational excellence. Its adaptability ensures it serves diverse industry requirements effectively.
Xurrent was previously known as 4me.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Director at Marval Software | 4.0 | As implementation partners, we use 4me for IT and enterprise service management. It features excellent multi-tenancy, though it lacks maturity compared to our previous product. 4me excels in the cloud via AWS, offering solutions where Marval doesn’t. |
| 4me Product Manager at Blue Turtle Technologies | 4.0 | 4me is a versatile ESM platform that manages various organizational functions beyond IT, such as HR and logistics. It includes comprehensive features at no extra cost, but lacks an asset discovery tool. I use it on Amazon Web Services. |
| Managing Director at Will Consulting | 4.0 | I use 4me for enterprise management and find it valuable. However, I believe adding an Asset Discovery feature would be beneficial. Although I haven't tried other solutions or specified a cloud provider, I have not evaluated the ROI yet. |
| Managing Director at Will Consulting | 4.0 | I find 4me stable, scalable, and appreciate its request and project management. Setup is simpler and licensing flexible compared to BMC Helix. However, I wish for more comprehensive asset management and improved branding options beyond just the service portal. |
We're implementation partners. We'll be implementing 4me for our customers who buy it.
The users can use it for various things, obviously for ITSM, but also for enterprise service management, facilities, HR, supply chain, and many other organizational functions, not just IT.
The multi-tenancy architecture, both in terms of functionality and reporting, is the best feature. It is a really well-thought, designed, and developed part of this product.
We're still biased towards our previous, more mature product. 4me still needs to reach that level of maturity. However, for most users, the product will do what they need.
It's only when you have mature service management processes and need deeper integrations at the process level that you might encounter some limitations. But for less mature needs, 4me works well.
We recently started working with 4me. So, I'm fairly new to 4me. We signed up as implementation partners for them.
The platform is very stable.
It is scalable. We just became implementation partners. One of our customers, our managed services company, has their customers using the platform.
We've worked with some of the technical staff, and they're excellent. They're experts in their own right and come from various service management backgrounds. The ones I've worked with have been great.
Positive
We used a more mature product. We didn't really switch. We found a different market segment we can address for me that we couldn't address with Marval. Marval's cloud is still immature, whereas, for 4me, the cloud is very good. It is a cloud solution. Marval is strong on-premise.
Although you can do multi-tenancy with Marval, the need wasn't high because it was an on-premise solution. So, we found for me as a complementary product to our basket because it addresses a different market segment.
The initial setup is easy because it's a cloud solution. There's some setup, like account settings, but the best part of the 4me platform is its well-designed multi-tenancy architecture.
It's not a very cheap product, but not a very expensive one either. The competitors are certainly more expensive. Considering the bundled functionality in your license, it outperforms many competitors at the price level.
The licensing costs on the website are about $60 for pay-as-you-go. And then it decreases based on volume discounts or something.
I would definitely recommend using this product. The good thing about 4me is its out-of-the-box functionality with minimal configuration and no-code deployment. Your time to go live is very short and painless, and the training is excellent, with online video training that can get you up and running quickly. This saves you money in deployment fees and allows you to unlock the value of the solution much earlier.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
4me is not limited to managing IT environments, it also serves as a comprehensive ESM platform. It can be utilized to handle a wide range of functions, including HR, logistics, and virtually any other service or process an organization needs to manage. It is a versatile solution that can adapt to various service management needs beyond IT.
It offers a comprehensive set of features without requiring additional payments for each feature. The core IT team solution comes with all the essential functionalities, which is highly beneficial. Among these features, workflow management stands out as particularly important to me.
One area where I believe there's room for improvement in the 4me system is the absence of an asset discovery tool. While it does offer integration options with external tools for this purpose, it would be highly advantageous if it either developed its own asset discovery tool or incorporated an existing one directly into the platform.
I have been working with it for four years now.
When it comes to stability, it offers exceptional stability features. I've had experience with other products where weekend support calls were quite common. Since I started using 4me, my weekends have remained uninterrupted, and I haven't had to deal with support calls during that time. I would rate it ten out of ten.
Regarding scalability, 4me is excellent. Unlike some other systems that tend to slow down as they scale, 4me, being a SaaS product, doesn't face such limitations. It can auto-scale effectively. To give you an idea of its scalability, I have more than twelve clients using it, with a total of well over three thousand users per month. These users span various organizations, and my largest customer has around five hundred and fifty licenses per month, serving approximately fifty thousand employees. I would rate its scalability capabilities ten out of ten.
The technical support provided is highly commendable. Their support team is exceptionally knowledgeable, and I haven't encountered any significant issues with them. In terms of the fundamental aspects of support, such as how they handle support requests, they excel and consistently provide a high level of service. I would rate it nine out of ten.
Positive
The initial setup is truly outstanding, and I would give it a rating of ten out of ten. It's remarkably easy and quick to implement compared to products like IBM or certain antivirus solutions. While those products can take several months to set up, 4me can typically be implemented within just a week.
The deployment duration can vary based on the complexity, size, and specific requirements of each customer. For smaller customers, typically with fewer than fifty users, the deployment can be completed in approximately twenty days. However, for larger customers with over two hundred users, the deployment process may extend to two to three months. The process generally begins with workshops to define requirements, followed by template creation, foundation data input, and the establishment of the service catalog. Subsequently, request and workflow templates are configured to enhance the service catalog. User Acceptance Testing (UAT) is conducted, followed by training sessions. The final stages include pre-go-live preparations, data migration to the production environment, and the actual go-live event. Post-go-live support and maintenance follow afterward.
It is a very affordable solution, with pricing varying somewhat from one country to another. On average, it typically costs around $45 per user per month. This pricing falls on the lower end of the spectrum, making it a cost-effective option. There are no additional fees for any of the features in 4me; the pricing is all-inclusive and fixed. I would rate it two out of ten.
My advice would be to place a strong emphasis on enhancing your service catalog and consider improving your services by implementing functional workflows. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
The solution is used for enterprise management.
Asset Discovery is a feature that should be added.
I have been using 4me for two years.
The solution is highly stable.
I think it's mainly for small and medium, but you can be a trusted enterprise as well.
The initial setup is straightforward.
The pricing is expensive. I rate it an eight out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Clients use 4me for IT, Human Resources, and project management.
I am comfortable with their features. I like their request management as well as their project management.
They can do more with their asset and configuration.
It would be beneficial in the next release if they could make it more localized so that clients could brand it with their own colors. As things currently stand, you can only brand the service portal.
It would be fantastic if they could revisit the option to customize or allow clients to localize and brand the back office forms or background forms. Currently, we can only brand the customer portal.
We would like to be able to customize and brand the solution, or at least the majority of its features and dashboards, particularly those that will be used by a large number of people.
I have been implementing this solution for the client, for the past six weeks.
4me provides Software as a Service and gives you access to their private cloud.
4me is a stable solution.
The scalability of 4me is good.
Our client has approximately 250 IT, and HR users.
We had interaction with technical support through the reseller. The reseller deals directly with the OEM. The process is very fast, it's excellent.
I have also worked with BMC Helix ITSM.
If you don't want to do complex integrations and workflow automation, I believe 4me is the tool to use.
When compared to BMC Helix ITSM, the 4me setup is much simpler and less complicated.
I would rate them a four out of five.
It is easy to configure, and easy to deploy everything.
It is dependent on the client's access and the availability of resources. You should be able to finish it in two to three weeks.
4me has the best price. It is the most affordable because it is priced per month per user.
BMC Helix doesn't have it, and if you don't use your license, they usually don't reserve it for another month, you can use 4me to manipulate your licenses however you want.
4me has a flexible licensing model.
I would rate the pricing a three and a half out of five.
I am a user of this solution, as well as an integrator.
I would rate 4me an eight out of ten.
