


Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
We are able to scan all our assets with less human intervention and achieve overall effective outcomes.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
After implementation, that dropped to about three to four hours, saving nearly eighty percent of manual effort in that area.
With JupiterOne, I have reduced the number of employees needed due to increased automation, which has also led to significant cost savings.
Using JupiterOne has helped me reduce my total time by almost twenty percent.
If we cannot adjust how to operate the solution, then it becomes very difficult, so hearing and initial tuning are very important.
Through the use of Tenable Security Center, my clients achieve more efficient patching and gain visibility and understanding of security operations, leading to improved resilience and infrastructure insight.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
Their team provided dedicated assistance for connecting integrations like AWS and GitHub, which made the first two to three weeks much smoother than expected.
Customer support for JupiterOne is good, and I find it quite strong, especially for enterprise use.
Customer support is responsive, typically answering within less than twenty-four hours of when I ask a question.
Longer response times and less thorough assistance.
They are helpful and were very helpful to us, coordinating with us on several issues.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
It handles diverse daily data, supports multi-cloud environments, and accommodates thousands of users and applications.
Our organization has grown from a few cloud resource accounts to hundreds of accounts and thousands of resources without needing to deploy additional JupiterOne infrastructure.
The scalability of JupiterOne is quite good. It is built to handle enterprise-scale infrastructures with thousands of assets across multiple cloud environments.
I can scale it extensively with the use of agents, allowing scanning in restrictive environments and loosely connected devices.
Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It has a lot of scanning mechanisms, which are agentless APIs, eBPF, and cloud agents, that are highly reliable.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
The stability of the solution is outstanding.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
Skills development is another important area that needs attention, as teams require training in graph-based query language to effectively handle large transaction datasets.
The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic.
JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.
The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements.
Translating reports into European languages is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
Overall, it is not cheap, but for what it does, it is a good value.
The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.
Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing.
The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
The key feature I rely on most in my daily work is the graph-based asset relationship mapping JupiterOne provides.
The ease of using queries and the new MCP feature has helped me because sometimes I would have difficulty writing the queries, but the AI within the query field in JupiterOne suggests if the query is incorrect and proposes a new query.
One of the best features JupiterOne offers is blast radius, being able to see assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by any cyber incident or to see how some assets communicate with other assets and some do not communicate with other assets.
We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed.
Tenable Security Center provides an overall score of vulnerabilities, comparing an organization with others in the same industry.
The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Qualys TotalCloud | 1.2% |
| Tenable Security Center | 2.4% |
| JupiterOne | 0.5% |
| Other | 95.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.
JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
What are JupiterOne's key features?In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.
Tenable Security Center offers vulnerability scanning, reporting, and customizable dashboards, aiding in security posture enhancement through Asset Discovery and Vulnerability Priority Rating. Its user-friendly interface and third-party integration support provide real-time insights and risk assessment.
Tenable Security Center efficiently manages vulnerabilities, offering valuable analytics, risk prioritization, and real-time insights. It supports automated updates, false-positive reduction, and compliance reporting. Users benefit from its asset discovery capabilities and its integrations with third-party tools. However, there's room for improvement in reporting customization, integration with tools like Jira, and the accuracy and speed of vulnerability scanning. The system could enhance its dynamic data displays, language support, and offer more pricing flexibility. While valued for scanning servers, workstations, and IoT devices, the setup complexity and policy modification challenges are noted.
What are the key features?Organizations in sectors like IT, finance, and healthcare implement Tenable Security Center for vulnerability management across internal and cloud networks. It facilitates compliance with industry standards and aids IT teams in conducting network-wide assessments, streamlining patch management, and strengthening overall security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.