Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Trend Vision One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
27th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
Network Detection and Response (NDR) (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (5th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Vision One is 3.0%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Rodrigo Censi - PeerSpot reviewer
Patch management and integration capabilities drive effective endpoint response management
We work with Kaspersky and two modalities: the Censi final and Censi license. Most of our clients work in financial areas and industry. Our regular enterprise business relies on these solutions Kaspersky is viable with ADR; the Endpoint Detection response feature and the BitLocker management…
Dennis Niedling - PeerSpot reviewer
The CREM feature is an absolutely essential feature that helps us meet security requirements
Since we started using Trend Vision One, we've been able to enhance our security posture significantly. Trend Vision One has improved significantly over time in providing centralized visibility and control. It started as a set of individual products, but now it feels like one integrated solution. This reduces the need for interfaces or multiple analysis tools. That's why we pursued the one-platform strategy. Trend Vision One has definitely helped consolidate our use of security vendors. We previously used standalone products for endpoint and email protection that weren't integrated. Now, we get the benefits of an integrated solution. I'd estimate we're 50–70% better in security now than we were two years ago. The Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)feature is absolutely essential. Even though we're not critical infrastructure, the NIS2 directive gives us security guidelines. CREM helps us meet these requirements. It is very important to our organization that Trend Vision One integrates AI into the platform. Pattern recognition in forensic data is no longer manageable by humans due to the volume of events. Machine learning is essential to process these and filter what needs human attention. Trend Vision One has improved our organization significantly. Security tasks used to be manual. Now, technology prevents issues or supports staff in detecting them. This shift from manual to technical solutions greatly increased our security. Trend Vision One has reduced the time we spend detecting and responding to threats. I'd say we're 80% faster than before. The platform gives us consolidated data upfront, so we don't have to search for event clues manually. Trend Vision One has helped reduce false alarms. I'd estimate a 50–60% time saving. We have more alerts now than years ago, but also better systems to handle them, making the whole process more efficient. Trend Vision One has helped reduce our cyber risk overall. We now know where gaps are before they become problems, whereas in the past we had to guess. That's a massive improvement. When it comes to operations, the CREM solution helps us identify vulnerabilities in systems. If we patch them, they disappear from the reports—this gives us actionable insights, which is incredibly helpful. It took about half a year to realize the benefits of Trend Vision One after implementation.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is endpoint protection."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is security. It has better security than other solutions, such as Symantec."
"The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is an effective protection solution."
"We compared Kaspersky and Trend Micro. The latter is significantly more expensive. That's the main difference."
"The detection engine running on endpoints works very well and provides a good protection level."
"The performance for Kaspersky is good, and it's not impacted our client performance."
"The product has an easy-to-use EDR module based on signature-based antivirus detection. It is a complete software."
"It is so helpful to have something that pulls all the data into one visual representation of the events."
"I like XDR's workbench feature and observed attack technique. It generates an alert once certain conditions are met. For example, let's say there's a threat called malicious.exe being deployed on your system. It will generate an alert with information like the file path, location, hash, etc. You also see a relational matrix showing how that file was executed and which processes were installed."
"We had a quick deployment. The solution is easy to set up."
"Trend Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across protection layers, which is crucial for compliance."
"The zero-day vulnerability is valuable."
"The most valuable features of Trend Vision One are its capabilities for XDR, EDR, MDR, and NDR, allowing for network detection and response."
"The most valuable feature is the network protection shield on every server, which isolates attacks and prevents our clients from being affected."
"The user interface is very good."
 

Cons

"Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."
"The issue with Kaspersky EDR is the sandbox. I'd like to have the ability to manage it on the cloud as well."
"Kaspersky EDR currently has limited OS support. They only focus on Windows Server and Windows. Kaspersky recently released a Linux version, but it's rudimentary. It does not have any advanced features available on Windows platforms. They should increase their footprint on the Linux side and support other operating systems on the market, like MacOS."
"The license prices for this solution are quite high."
"The solution does not offer much support to its users in Spanish, so I would like to see them offer more support in Spanish."
"The Kaspersky console could be easier to navigate and generate reports from."
"Kaspersky EDR lacks protection from recent ransomware."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert needs to include a traffic interface."
"The product needs to have a lot more maturity, and they need to improve the overall technical support framework for getting the value out of XDR."
"The only downside to Trend Vision One is its complexity."
"Vision One could improve its area networking and email security."
"I believe that the interface could be more user-friendly. At times, it is challenging to locate certain features, and they need to reorganize the user interfaces."
"There should be a bit more dynamism when it comes to their playbooks in terms of the action triggers. That is the only thing that I would want to see a bit more."
"The automation capabilities on-premises could be improved, as we currently have to manually activate servers and push policies."
"There are limitations in terms of threat response actions."
"Improving the user interface would be helpful—it can be confusing, especially if you do not use it daily."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is okay."
"The solution isn't the cheapest considering what you get. I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten."
"The solution is worth its cost so I rate pricing a ten out of ten."
"We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better."
"The pricing is reasonable. Not too cheap, not too expensive."
"The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five."
"The product has a valuable pricing model. We need to purchase its monthly subscription."
"The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet."
"We have an annual subscription and I believe there is no option for monthly billing at the moment."
"Trend Vision One is cost-effective because it offers detailed reporting and environment control features."
"The pricing of the solution is okay. There is a need for me to look into the new pricing plan introduced by the solution recently."
"From a pricing standpoint, they're a really good negotiator and they'll work with you."
"The solution is fairly priced."
"I do not have much visibility to it. It is definitely not a cheap product, but to my knowledge, it is out there with the big wigs in the industry, such as CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and other EDR/XDR vendors. I had heard, and found out eventually, that their sales teams are very flexible, as more sales teams are."
"It's relatively well-priced."
"The cost is considered fairly priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Educational Organization
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
19%
Educational Organization
19%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?
The Kaspersky console could be easier to navigate and generate reports from. We've got Stripe in the method of deployment, which makes it easier and requires lower integration from my team. Deploym...
What do you like most about Trend Micro XDR?
I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring.
What needs improvement with Trend Micro XDR?
In future releases of Trend Vision One, I would like to see improvements regarding role-based access control, as it is important to ensure that when granting admin access to a person, their visibil...
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky EDR
Trend Micro XDR, Trend Micro XDR for Users, Trend Vision One - XDR for Networks
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia
Panasonic North America, Decathlon, Fischer Homes, Banijay Benelux, Unigel, DHR Health,
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trend Vision One and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.