


Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response compete in the field of endpoint protection. Kaspersky seems to have the upper hand due to its highly effective detection rate and robust threat prevention features.
Features: Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response provides advanced threat hunting, guided investigation, and real-time monitoring capabilities. It offers a centralized dashboard integrating EDR and antivirus, enhancing usability. Users value its technical and investigative capabilities. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a high detection rate, behavior monitoring, and effective threat prevention. Its functionality integrates well for comprehensive endpoint protection with centralized management.
Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR could improve its AI capabilities, optimize resource usage, and enhance technical support. Automation and historical search features also require refinement. Kaspersky could enhance configuration options, resolve communication issues, and improve zero-day threat detection. Enhancements in interface and integration capabilities are needed for better user experience and quicker response times.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR offers diverse deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, but is resource-intensive with reported technical support challenges. Kaspersky primarily deploys on-premises, and users encounter less favorable support experiences. Both solutions have room to improve technical support efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR offers competitive pricing that matches its capabilities, promising returns from improved IT security operations. Users value the flexibility, although resource demands might impact cost assessments. Kaspersky EDR retains a competitive and cost-effective pricing structure, confirmed by robust features despite integration challenges. Both solutions demonstrate measurable ROI, though Trellix users note its rapid operational impact in critical settings.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
I have contracted support and also have an operating control so I can get various types of support.
On our servers, we do not want it to touch our resources, so we deployed Sophos XDR on the server.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
I think scalability for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is good.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
So I have to use Sophos XDR on servers because Sophos XDR does not consume resources.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is interesting and is a very good entry point that has been evolving through the last years.
They can enhance Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) using AI now to do more enhanced reporting and more enhanced threat analysis.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The main network is being monitored through the firewall at that level.
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has very good threat hunting capability.
I have spent efforts on training our managers and others - what can software do if the knowledge base is low?
All the tree of data that we have, which may be a lot of information to argue whether it is going to be a threat or not, can be analyzed.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response | 1.0% |
| Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | 1.0% |
| Other | 94.6% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 48 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response integrates antivirus, threat response, and EDR with high detection rates, behavior detection, and device control. It supports centralized management for seamless operation across remote and on-premise servers.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a robust platform featuring automated responses, advanced reporting, and customizable policies. Users appreciate its lightweight agent and compatibility, though many report issues with stability and resource intensity. While effective in malware detection and incident response, challenges remain in configuration, integration, and efficient patch management. Zero-day detection and cloud version stability have room for improvement. However, its capabilities make it highly recommended in regions like Pakistan.
What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?In industries prioritizing security, such as finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids in threat hunting and behavior analysis. It integrates with SIEM systems, allowing precise encryption, targeted attack protection, and device management. Deployed on servers, workstations, and mobile devices, it's particularly esteemed in areas like Pakistan for its robust capabilities.
Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.
Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.
Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.