Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

KeeperPAM vs Okta Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

KeeperPAM
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Okta Platform
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (2nd), Authentication Systems (5th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (2nd), Access Management (2nd), ZTNA as a Service (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (1st), AI IT Support (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of KeeperPAM is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Okta Platform is 3.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Okta Platform3.1%
KeeperPAM1.5%
Other95.4%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Mahesh-Subramanian - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President at Chargebacks911
Offers security audit that shows us how many passwords are weak and how often they're being changed
There are a couple of things. One is the BreachWatch feature. It's one of the most useful things because it shows us who on our team has weak or compromised passwords. So, it checks the passwords and helps improve them. There's also a security audit that shows us how many passwords are weak and how often they're being changed. Some people haven't changed their passwords for months, even though applications force them to change every 45 or 90 days. So you can catch those issues and warn them. Most applications allow for rotation, but some don't. I've seen people use the same password for years. At least Keeper tells us these passwords haven't been rotated, and we can warn them to change them manually since we can't force people to change the password.
SumitMundik - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Admin Systems at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Authentication process improves security with quick and intuitive user interface
The best feature is the speed and execution of Okta Workforce Identity. The moment you click on single sign-on, you immediately get the notification on your mobile phone, then you do the authentication and within a second you get authenticated. The entire customer experience is very good. The user interface is pretty simple, straightforward, and really good. Multi-factor authentication in Okta Workforce Identity is very useful so people who do not have access or are trying to access using just a user ID and password will be completely blocked because of this two-factor authentication. You will get the code, and as your device is authorized in the system, only that device can be used for the authentication purpose. A third person trying to access or hack your data will not be able to do that anymore. Additionally, you don't have to remember your passwords going forward. Previously, every 60 days or 90 days, passwords kept changing. With the two-factor authentication or single sign-on option in Okta Workforce Identity, you don't have to remember it anymore or write down passwords in plain text. If something goes wrong, we have the IAM team which can unlock your account immediately if you have issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"BreachWatch feature is one of the most useful things because it shows us who on our team has weak or compromised passwords."
"One of the most beneficial features of the solution is the user provisioning and the de-provisioning feature."
"The main benefits Okta Customer Identity provides to users include single point of login for all applications and single authentication, which saves time and reduces frustration."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are MFA, and SSO, which have high security."
"My total rating for Okta is ten out of ten."
"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."
"We primarily use it to manage the community onboarding and offboarding of users, and it's quite a simple solution for that."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"In my opinion, Okta Platform's best features include federation, which is very important, especially when you work with different systems."
 

Cons

"The final implementation was challenging because we had to roll it out to three different departments within the same umbrella, each with its own domains."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"Whenever I write Cypress test cases, we encounter problems with logging in through Okta."
"Okta doesn't have a partial push. It pushes down the full profile schema for lifecycle management or provisioning."
"The solution is very expensive."
"I think the setup in the beginning can be a bit of a learning curve."
"It would be great if there were a way to save even my social media passwords and other passwords through Okta Platform and single sign-on through Okta Platform in the future."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's good value for money."
"The solution's pricing model could be better for SMBs."
"The price of this product could be lower."
"The solution’s pricing needs to be reasonable. You are dealing with a lot of components and the pricing is component-based."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The licensing model is fine for general service usage. However, the charges for API features and API tokens can be quite high."
"This is an expensive solution but the security makes it worthwhile."
"The price of the solution is good."
"Workforce Identity is well-priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Media Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise44
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with KeeperPAM?
We had some challenges with the initial setup.
What is your primary use case for KeeperPAM?
We primarily use it to ensure that all our people store their passwords in KeeperPAM and do not have multiple sources for their passwords, including Excel. We also share passwords through KeeperPAM...
What do you like most about Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta has introduced the Universal Directory. It has custom attribute capability and user permissions to read/write on their profiles or hide them. Profile sources and identity profile sourcing are ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Okta Workforce Identity?
Pricing for Okta is reasonably not that much, however, I don't have access to the commercial aspect.
What needs improvement with Okta Workforce Identity?
Currently, in Okta Workforce Identity we get the two-digit authentication code. Instead of getting the two-digit authentication code, if we had an option to do fingerprint verification, that would ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Okta Customer Identity, Workforce Identity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
FedEx, Zoom, Takeda, Lululemon Athletica, GrunHub, jetBlue, McKensson, Bain & Company, Engie, Peloton, Sonos, T-Mobile, Hewlett Packard, MGM Resorts, Ally Financial, Priceline, Albertsons, Itercom, Classy, FICO, Kensho, Live Nation, Drata, Rotary, and others.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Delinea and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.