Kemp LoadMaster vs Uplynk comparison

Read 7 Uplynk reviews

5,109 Views
2,044 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kemp LoadMaster and Uplynk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Kemp LoadMaster vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: September 2026).

Kemp LoadMaster vs. Uplynk

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

27th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (13th)

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

28th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (7th), CDN (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kemp LoadMaster	1.3%
Uplynk	1.4%
Other	97.3%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

IshtiaqKhalil

Information Security Engineer at BOK

Displays flexible, user-friendly interface with minor licensing challenges

The product could be improved with a more intuitive interface for complex configurations and more advanced analytics. Additionally, enhanced security features, like a more robust Web Application Firewall, and stronger APIs for better automation would be beneficial. Overall, the main areas for improvement are in strengthening the advanced features to better meet the demands of large-scale enterprise environments. key features for the next release should focus on three areas. First, an enhanced, next-generation security suite with a more powerful Web Application Firewall (WAF) and integrated bot protection. Second, more advanced and customizable analytics dashboards to provide deeper insights into application performance. Finally, greater support for modern, cloud-native environments, including better APIs for automation and seamless hybrid-cloud traffic management

Read full review

AliKhalil

manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable live streaming has increased our continuous viewership and maintained audience trust

Uplynk is deployed in my organization on-premises and is fully on-site. Uplynk supports our business continuity or disaster recovery plans because it's really well protected and it doesn't lag or crash when there's a spike in all areas. Uplynk helps us comply with regulatory requirements in our industry by keeping us live. Uplynk integrates really well with other systems or tools we use. You need a whole team to really run Uplynk because there are so many moving pieces, the code, the app, and other components. My experience with Uplynk's analytics or reporting capabilities is that they are especially helpful to update the teams and our stakeholders. I would describe Uplynk's flexibility or customization options as really easy, really customizable, and it integrates in many areas. Uplynk helps me deliver content to different devices or platforms by allowing us to upload on and stay live on tablets, computers, and televisions. It allows us to stay live to get those viewerships. Uplynk is a software that saves time, but you need a solid team to run Uplynk to ensure viewership and everything is moving because there are many pieces to keep. I advise others looking into using Uplynk that it takes many different areas: coding, integration, APIs, and all that. It takes a team to run it, and you need to be a big company. If you're streaming and doing all that at a big scale, use it. If you're on a smaller scale, Uplynk is going to be really hard for you to manage. It's not something that's simple; just use the ones that are basic out there if you're an influencer and things like that. I would rate this product a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is very good. They are quick to answer questions and provide online help."

"From the installation and configuration to the daily routine, Kemp is great."

"One of the most valuable features I like is the ability to block specific cipher suites like RC4, and older protocols like SSL 3.0."

"When we started using KEMP, we didn't face a single connectivity or delay issue on Skype for Business."

"Kemp LoadMaster is more efficient than the HA Proxy that we used a long time ago; it is an easy-to-use, user-friendly interface, and you can set up a new VIP in a couple of minutes."

"This is a very competitive solution - they have a very solid product and it's cheaper than other solutions."

"We really like the performance of this solution."

"The solution is easy to configure when changing the load balancing method to Round Robin or least connection."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"Uplynk has positively impacted our organization by bringing us more viewership, as it does not glitch and stays stable during spikes in viewership, leading to approximately a 15 to 20 percent increase in viewership because there's no lag and nothing fails."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

Cons

"I want Kemp LoadMaster to provide users with better reporting capabilities in relation to TCP packets. In general, the connections that are present in the system require improvement."

"The UI is very basic and not very attractive, so this could be an area for improvement."

"When we go serverless, we may again have to revisit this because the configuration needs to be changed, and with this change, we can run into a lot of other configurations that we haven't got into, which involve additional expenses."

"They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product."

"There are many features that are missing or poorly implemented and things that you simply cannot do."

"If I had to pick an area for improvement, I think it would be direct integration with the template library."

"Obviously, there are a lot of moving parts and fieldssettings on Kemp LoadMaster. Not all the settings are easily understandable."

"I definitely think that the WAF can be improved."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"The pricing was initially very expensive."

"To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Download Kemp's VLM trial and take it for a test drive; you will be impressed."

"It has a very attractive ratio of price/performance."

"This product has good value and features for the money."

"The product definitely provides what the organization needs and its cost is reasonable considering the value it brings."

"The pricing is alright and we pay a monthly licensing fee"

"Licensing is yearly and I am going to guess that it is CAN $2000.00."

"I have control on the licensing and all the prices since I work for a partner."

"The price is great and the value is definitely there."

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

My primary advice is to carefully analyze your total cost of ownership (TCO) rather than just the initial purchase price. Kemp LoadMaster is highly competitive on price and often provides a much be...

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

What is your primary use case for Kemp LoadMaster?

Our primary use case was traffic load balancing and distribution. The solution was essential for managing all inbound client traffic, including HTTPS and DNS requests, by routing it through our fir...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

I wasn't a part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing discussions, but from what I heard from my colleagues, they said it was really good and it was fair, so they went with that.

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work. Uplynk is very complex software with many moving pieces. If you're a big company, Uplynk...

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

My main use case for Uplynk is live channels around the clock. Since we're in the television business, we're constantly showcasing shows, and it's a continuous operation.

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 12% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 10% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 7% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 9% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Kemp LoadMaster

September 2026

Download Uplynk product report

August 2026

Also Known As

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Kemp LoadMaster enhances server performance by providing secure, intuitive load balancing solutions with easy deployment. It supports high availability, integrates seamlessly with IT infrastructure, and ensures optimal traffic distribution for critical applications.

Kemp LoadMaster is known for its ease of use and high-level security capabilities, making it ideal for managing multiple servers. Its intuitive interface simplifies configuration for load balancing and reverse proxy across multi-site Exchange, while the Edge Security Pack distinguishes between critical infrastructure and public internet. Supporting seamless service continuity and effective traffic distribution, it significantly boosts server performance through SSL offloading and intelligent monitoring. However, improvements are desired in stability and reporting, as well as in security features such as a robust Web Application Firewall and more intuitive logging and monitoring.

What are Kemp LoadMaster's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface simplifies server management.
Security Capabilities: Edge Security Pack aids infrastructure security.
Load Balancing: Ensures effective traffic distribution.
High Availability: Supports seamless service continuity.
SSL Offloading: Enhances server performance through encryption management.

What Benefits and ROI Should You Look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined configuration for better operational effectiveness.
Enhanced Security: Protects infrastructure with advanced security options.
Optimized Performance: Intelligent monitoring results in improved server output.
Service Continuity: High availability ensures uninterrupted operations.

Kemp LoadMaster is implemented across industries that require robust IT infrastructure management. Organizations use it for load balancing in Exchange environments, securing web servers, and maintaining high availability for public sector services. It supports applications like RDP, SQL, DNS, SharePoint, Citrix, and VoIP, ensuring security and high performance.

Progress Software

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Sample Customers

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach