KerioConnect vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security comparison

KerioConnect delivers easy-to-use and secure email, calendar, and collaboration tools compatible with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync. Cost-effective and flexible, it suits on-premise installations, especially for SMBs seeking privacy and security.

KerioConnect offers a comprehensive email server experience with minimal resource needs and effective spam filtering. Compatible across platforms, it supports Outlook, enabling organizations to manage corporate communications efficiently. Its ability to host multiple domains makes it suitable for sectors like warehouse distribution and retail, with installation options that enhance security and privacy. However, faster Outlook integration, improved MS Teams and CRM system integration, and AI functionalities are sought after by users. Some demand a cloud version, Linux support, and better documentation. Still, KerioConnect remains a reliable choice for those needing on-premise capabilities.

• Ease of Use: Simplified interface for seamless navigation.
• Robust Security: Advanced protection measures to safeguard data.
• Spam Filtering: Efficiently reduces unwanted emails.
• Platform Compatibility: Integrates with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync.
• Log Analysis: Offers detailed insights for server management.
• Multiple Domain Support: Manages diverse domains with ease.

• Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs compared to alternatives.
• Resource Minimization: Requires minimal system resources.
• Deployment Flexibility: Allows tailored on-premise installations.
• Enhanced Security: Provides privacy through internal hosting options.
• Reliable Support: Access to reseller services from Sophos.

KerioConnect is widely utilized in SMBs across sectors like retail and warehouse distribution for its capability to handle multiple domains and integrate with Outlook for communication management. Resellers offer it as a dependable on-site email management solution, letting businesses maintain oversight and security control.

Mimecast Email Security protects organizations against phishing, malware, business email compromise, and impersonation attacks, with detection built on 20 years of experience and over 1.3 billion emails inspected daily. It's available as a secure email gateway (MX-based) for full control over complex, multi-region environments, or via API integration with Microsoft 365, which deploys in hours with no MX changes. Administrators get a single console for policy management, monitoring external communications, and customizing configurations, and can pair it with Mimecast Cloud Archive for long-term email retention and compliance.

What key features should users explore?

• Sandboxing: Full emulation sandboxing and AI-driven static analysis detect threats in attachments before delivery.
• Spam and Phishing Protection: Multi-layered detection catches both payload-based attacks and payloadless, socially-engineered BEC attempts.
• URL Inspection: Computer Vision AI analyzes destination pages to catch phishing and brand impersonation.
• API Deployment Option: Deploys in hours without MX or mail flow changes, with 30-day historical scanning to show threats your current defenses missed.
• Email Archiving (via Cloud Archive): Secure long-term storage supporting compliance needs.

What benefits can impact ROI?

• Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to standards like HIPAA through retention and monitoring.
• Integration: Deep integration with Microsoft 365, deployable as a gateway or via API depending on your environment.
• Rapid Time to Value: API deployment proves protection value in hours, before any infrastructure commitment.
• Threat Prevention: Detection engines refined daily against 1.3 billion emails, trusted by 42,000 customers globally.

Industries and use cases

Mimecast Email Security is used across industries, including healthcare and finance, to secure inbound and outbound communications and support compliance requirements. Enterprises use it as a gateway, an API-based layer on top of Microsoft 365, or both, depending on how much control versus deployment speed they need.