

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Komodor both operate within the realm of container orchestration and real-time Kubernetes troubleshooting. OpenShift seems to have an edge in comprehensive features for deployment and management, while Komodor excels in specialized troubleshooting.
Features: Red Hat OpenShift is recognized for its comprehensive automation, scalability, and robust security features. The platform supports centralized control of container resources and provides user-friendly interfaces with easy deployment through OpenShift Operator. Komodor offers real-time monitoring and debugging, with features that provide clear insights and facilitate faster problem resolution. Its event timelines and notifications enhance the visibility and management of Kubernetes deployments.
Room for Improvement: OpenShift could benefit from a more simplified deployment process and reduced complexity for users unfamiliar with complex architectures. Enhancing user interface navigation and optimizing resource costs could also be beneficial. Komodor could expand its documentation and tutorials to better assist new users. Additional integration capabilities with various Kubernetes tools and improved scalability options could enhance its usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenShift's deployment, though feature-rich, requires a certain level of expertise in complex architectures, with reliable customer support. Komodor is noted for its straightforward deployment process and strong support channels, which allow for efficient implementation and issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: OpenShift’s structured pricing reflects its extensive feature set, potentially resulting in higher initial setup costs but offering broad capabilities for large-scale operations. Komodor generally provides a more affordable option with quicker ROI, focusing on cost-effective troubleshooting within Kubernetes environments.
We saw around ninety percent ROI using Komodor.
I would rate the customer support from Komodor a ten out of ten.
They should prioritize skilled engineers for urgent issues.
Komodor is very highly scalable in terms of infrastructure and in terms of the number of nodes we use.
I rate the scalability of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform as a nine, as I haven't encountered any issues with scaling a cluster or applications.
Scalability is rated nine out of ten.
There haven't been any issues so far; it remains stable with no downtime or crashes, and even the upgrades are handled seamlessly without issues.
There are some features related to the platform that are missing in Komodor, such as Tigera status or CNI pods.
Currently, it is a clear text method allowing anyone in the namespace to see the username and password, which should be controlled in that way.
The solution itself doesn't require a high learning curve; it is actually quite good to manage.
I would like to see advanced cluster management added in future releases, such as a single pane of glass to manage multiple clusters.
Compared with Rancher or any other tools, Komodor is priced cheaply and available at a fair price.
Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feedback, it is quite expensive.
The current licensing cost for this solution is around $23,000 per year, per month.
For instance, when application teams want to deploy their applications, if Rancher is not up or running, the deployments usually fail at the deployment stage. In the case of Komodor, there have been no such cases reported after adopting it.
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform's policy-based governance has helped my organization maintain application security at scale because ACS is also there, and Red Hat is always maintaining things with hardening methods, always coming with hardened images, and we are frequently upgrading the minor and major versions, so it will be mitigated in that way.
In terms of features in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, I find the orchestration itself quite useful for my customers because it integrates with lots of tools.
The cluster scaling features, such as the auto-scaling of cluster nodes and application replicas using horizontal and vertical pod auto-scaling, significantly impact our operations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform | 18.9% |
| Komodor | 3.6% |
| Other | 77.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 40 |
Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.
Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.