Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Komodor vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

Komodor and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Komodor holds a 4.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 20.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Komodor
Read 5 Komodor reviews
  • 1,244 Views
  • 1,244 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Read 51 Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reviews
  • 6,602 Views
  • 6,536 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 13, 2024

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Komodor both operate within the realm of container orchestration and real-time Kubernetes troubleshooting. OpenShift seems to have an edge in comprehensive features for deployment and management, while Komodor excels in specialized troubleshooting.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift is recognized for its comprehensive automation, scalability, and robust security features. The platform supports centralized control of container resources and provides user-friendly interfaces with easy deployment through OpenShift Operator. Komodor offers real-time monitoring and debugging, with features that provide clear insights and facilitate faster problem resolution. Its event timelines and notifications enhance the visibility and management of Kubernetes deployments.

Room for Improvement: OpenShift could benefit from a more simplified deployment process and reduced complexity for users unfamiliar with complex architectures. Enhancing user interface navigation and optimizing resource costs could also be beneficial. Komodor could expand its documentation and tutorials to better assist new users. Additional integration capabilities with various Kubernetes tools and improved scalability options could enhance its usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenShift's deployment, though feature-rich, requires a certain level of expertise in complex architectures, with reliable customer support. Komodor is noted for its straightforward deployment process and strong support channels, which allow for efficient implementation and issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: OpenShift’s structured pricing reflects its extensive feature set, potentially resulting in higher initial setup costs but offering broad capabilities for large-scale operations. Komodor generally provides a more affordable option with quicker ROI, focusing on cost-effective troubleshooting within Kubernetes environments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Komodor vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Komodor vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,088 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Komodor
Ranking in Container Management
13th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
9.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Ranking in Container Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 4.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is 20.0%, down from 21.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform20.0%
Komodor4.2%
Other75.8%
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski - PeerSpot reviewer
Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time
There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources. I am looking forward to using AI-powered troubleshooting workflow that Komodor unrolled recently.
Read full review
Rifat Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration and automation have transformed deployment and maintenance
Regarding the learning curve, the customers actually do not need the technical nitty-gritty details; they need to know about the containerization journey because they are not familiar with it. They know it as a theory, but they don't understand anything about its practical implications. That's the main challenge. The solution itself doesn't require a high learning curve; it is actually quite good to manage. However, application developers and managers have to understand the beauty of it, and that is the challenge. If Red Hat can execute some programs regarding that, it will help. Regarding Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, it is expensive according to market feedback. Notably, the platform plus is perceived as quite expensive and some features from an infrastructure perspective are lacking.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."
"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."
"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."
"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."
"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."
"I like the Flexibility of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency."
"It’s user-friendly."
"The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful for businesses. It also comes with features like OpenShift Virtualization."
"They have built on top of Kubernetes. Most of the Kubernetes latest technology is already supported by the solution."
"For us, the fully automated upgrades are valuable. We have to maintain the clusters in production. For us, it is very important that it does not take too much time to manage all the clusters and do life cycle management and upgrades."
"The operating system has a live update and is more secure than any other. It's made for Atomic OS, a lightweight OS new to the market. I also like the source-to-image capabilities. The customer can directly deploy their applications from the repository. It's a highly flexible and easy way to deploy into production."
"Centralized control of container resources is most valuable."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pros
 

Cons

"Komodor's visibility could be improved."
"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."
"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."
"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."
"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."
"The interface has numerous UI bugs that need addressing."
"The product's interface is a bit buggy."
"The monitoring and logging could be improved."
"OpenShift has certain restrictions in terms of managing the cluster when it's running on a public cloud. For example, identity and access management integration with the IM of AWS is quite difficult. It requires some open-source tools to integrate. This is one area where I always see room for improvement."
"I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process."
"There is room for improvement with integration."
"Container Platform could be improved if we could aggregate logs out of the box instead of having to do it through integrations with other products."
"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far as I can recall, the licensing cost was fair."
"The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."
"We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."
"Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."
"It largely depends on how much money they earn from the application being deployed; you don't normally deploy an app just for the purpose of having it. You must constantly look into your revenue and how much you spend every container, minute, or hour of how much it is working."
"We have to pay for the license."
"The price is slightly on the higher side. It is something that can be worked on because most of the businesses now have margins."
"The pricing is expensive for licensing."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten. There is a subscription called OpenShift Plus, which offers additional features and products the vendor provides to complement the OpenShift Container Platform. These include ACM, Red Hat Quay, and Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation."
"Its licensing is completely incomprehensible. We have special people within our company. They discuss with Red Hat subscription managers. It is too complex, and I do not understand it. We are from the government, and we are trying to be as cheap as possible. Sometimes, I am just amazed at the amount of money that we have to pay. It is crazy."
"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."
"I'm an architect, so I have no involvement in the pricing and licensing of the platform."
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Media Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise39
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?
The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Komodor?
There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Komodor?
We are an HR analytics company, and we do a lot of data processing. Our customers send us their HR-related data, and we process it so that we can run analytics on it. We process it on Kubernetes cl...
See all answers
Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?
Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...
See all answers
What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?
The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenShift Container Platform?
The current licensing cost for this solution is around $23,000 per year, per month. Regarding the current licensing cost, I would rate my satisfaction around seven or seven and a half; there's alwa...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor Logo
Portainer vs Komodor
Compared 79% of the time
Rancher Labs vs Komodor Logo
Rancher Labs vs Komodor
Compared 13% of the time
Kubernetes vs Komodor Logo
Kubernetes vs Komodor
Compared 5% of the time
More Komodor Competitors
Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 49% of the time
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 12% of the time
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 9% of the time
HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Logo
HashiCorp Nomad vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Komodor
August 2025
Komodor reportDownload Komodor product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
August 2025
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform reportDownload Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform product report
 

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health
Buyer's Guide
Komodor vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
July 2025
Free Report: Komodor vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Komodor vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,088 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Komodor vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.