Kondukto [EOL] vs Software Risk Manager ASPM comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Black Duck are both solutions in the Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) category. Invicti is ranked #20, while Black Duck is ranked #17. Invicti holds a 1.9% mindshare in ASPM, compared to Black Duck’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution.

Kondukto [EOL]

Read 1 Kondukto [EOL] review

1,531 Views
643 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Software Risk Manager ASPM

Read 1 Software Risk Manager ASPM review

3,177 Views
1,144 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Kondukto [EOL]

Software Risk Manager ASPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Software Risk Manager ASPM and Kondukto [EOL] compete in the field of software risk management. Software Risk Manager ASPM holds an advantage in pricing and support, while Kondukto [EOL] is stronger in features, providing enhanced value that justifies its cost.

Features:Software Risk Manager ASPM provides comprehensive risk assessment tools, detailed risk analysis and management, and customizable dashboards. Kondukto [EOL] focuses on advanced vulnerability management, seamless integration across various CI/CD pipelines, and strong automation and integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Software Risk Manager ASPM offers straightforward deployment with extensive guidance, ensuring minimal disruption, and customer service with prompt responses and effective problem resolution. Kondukto [EOL] uses a more complex deployment model for larger organizations, supported by strategic consultations and detailed onboarding. The service is enhanced with personalized, tailored solutions.

Pricing and ROI:Software Risk Manager ASPM has a competitive initial setup cost with attractive ROI due to efficient risk management processes, reducing long-term project costs. Kondukto [EOL] has a higher setup cost but offers substantial ROI from strong automation features, resulting in significant resource savings, offsetting upfront expenses through extended operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kondukto [EOL]

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

51st

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (19th)

Software Risk Manager ASPM

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

30th

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

17th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) category, the mindshare of Kondukto [EOL] is 1.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Software Risk Manager ASPM is 3.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Software Risk Manager ASPM	3.4%
Kondukto	1.9%
Other	94.7%

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Abdel-Hassanein

Co-Founder and Business Development at TeCrypt

Unified dashboard has simplified managing multiple scanners and improved vulnerability remediation

The best feature and biggest benefit of the product is the ability to manage different scanners from a single dashboard. Regarding analytics capability, Kondukto provides actionable insights into security needs because it performs all the work on the customer's behalf. It checks findings and vulnerabilities from different scanners, confirms that all findings are matched together, and makes it clear and confident that the final finding is truly a vulnerability requiring action. Regarding automation features, Kondukto is fully automated and fully integrated with a plug and play approach. In terms of integration with DevOps pipelines, the benefit is that Kondukto itself is not an integration tool. The DAST tool is integrated, and I can manage the scanner. The tool itself, whether it is DAST or SAST, will be integrated with DevOps and other tools like notification tools, SIEM, and SOC. The scanner tool itself will be managed under Kondukto, but Kondukto does not provide integration. There is no need because the scanner itself will integrate with other tools.

Read full review

Saravanan_Radhakrishnan

Senior Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Facilitates continuous assessment of applications, covering both static and dynamic security aspects

Code Dx lacks one aspect, the dynamic security part, known as DAST. It's not an on-premise solution; it's in the cloud now. There are compliance standards and data standards where the customer might need to have the data on-premises for dynamic security testing. So that is one shortfall. An area of improvement could be developing an on-premise DAST solution. The current one is a complete cloud-based solution, and that can be one of the areas of improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kondukto helps consolidate security findings by correlating them to minimize false positives and giving customers a complete and clear vision of high critical findings in an easy way."

"The customers were looking for something around static security and dynamic security, and in all those areas, they were looking for an industry leader with a proven solution. Synopsys is a Gartner leader, so I position this particular technology for the technical pre-sales part of it."

Cons

"The primary concerns I have are that it is somewhat expensive, support would rate as seven, and there were licensing activation issues."

"The initial setup is a bit challenging because things are not easy. It needs a lot of technology adaptability plus the customer's environment-specific use cases."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is more of an enterprise solution for budget-conscious customers. So, it's moderately priced. It's not for everybody."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Snyk vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

DefectDojo vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

SonarQube vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Data Theorem API Secure vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Kondukto [EOL] Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 21% of the time

Veracode vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 11% of the time

Polaris Platform vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 9% of the time

DeepFactor vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Software Risk Manager ASPM

Compared 6% of the time

More Software Risk Manager ASPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Kondukto [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

October 2026

Download Software Risk Manager ASPM product report

Also Known As

No data available

Code Dx

Overview

Kondukto offers robust solutions designed for advanced security in software development. It centralizes vulnerability management, enhancing efficiency for teams and improving the security posture across projects.

As a comprehensive platform, Kondukto streamlines vulnerability management by integrating with existing development tools to automate and simplify processes. It informs users promptly about potential security threats, enabling swift risk mitigation. Kondukto caters to enterprises by providing essential insights and high adaptability in software environments.

What are the core features of Kondukto?

Integration Compatibility: Seamlessly aligns with popular development tools, ensuring a smooth workflow.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort by automating repetitive tasks related to security checks.
Risk Assessment: Offers detailed reports on vulnerabilities, assisting in prioritizing security fixes.
Custom Alerts: Configurable notifications to keep teams informed about significant security developments.

Why consider Kondukto?

Efficiency Boost: Streamlined processes lead to faster threat identification and resolution.
Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring maintains a high level of security assurance.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprises with expanding needs.

Kondukto is utilized in industries like finance and healthcare, where data protection is crucial. Its implementation focuses on integrating within existing ecosystems to strengthen security protocols without disrupting workflow. By providing relevant insights, it aids businesses in maintaining compliance and managing risk effectively.

Invicti

Software Risk Manager is an application security posture management (ASPM) solution that enables security and development teams to manage their application security programs at enterprise scale. By unifying policy, test orchestration, correlation, prioritization, and built-in static application security testing (SAST) and software composition analysis (SCA) engines, organizations can streamline their security activities across the enterprise.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Trendyol, Ödeal

Discover why companies like: CGI said, "Synopsys and Software Risk Manager have provided the results we’re looking for".

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Snyk, Wiz, Veracode and others in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.