Kondukto [EOL] vs Veracode comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Veracode are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Invicti is ranked #51, while Veracode is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.5. Invicti holds a 0.7% mindshare in SAST, compared to Veracode’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Veracode users who would recommend it.

Kondukto [EOL]

Read 1 Kondukto [EOL] review

1,531 Views
1,148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Veracode

Read 208 Veracode reviews

30,728 Views
15,979 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Kondukto [EOL]

Veracode

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Veracode and Kondukto [EOL] compete in the application security realm. Veracode appears to have an influence advantage, but Kondukto [EOL] shines in feature richness.

Features: Veracode's key offerings include robust static application security testing, effective integration capabilities, and comprehensive cloud-based services. Kondukto [EOL] stands out for its broad vulnerability management, orchestration tools, and extensive management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode provides a cloud-based deployment model with thorough support resources, ensuring effective implementation. Kondukto [EOL]'s cloud-oriented approach facilitates seamless integration and simple setup, highlighted by proactive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode involves a higher setup cost with significant initial investment requirements. In contrast, Kondukto [EOL] offers competitive pricing that focuses on quick ROI, appealing to budget-sensitive tech buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kondukto [EOL]

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

51st

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (19th)

Veracode

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Container Security (13th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (2nd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Kondukto [EOL] is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 4.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Veracode	4.9%
Kondukto	0.7%
Other	94.4%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Mohamed Abdel-Hassanein

Co-Founder and Business Development at TeCrypt

Unified dashboard has simplified managing multiple scanners and improved vulnerability remediation

The best feature and biggest benefit of the product is the ability to manage different scanners from a single dashboard. Regarding analytics capability, Kondukto provides actionable insights into security needs because it performs all the work on the customer's behalf. It checks findings and vulnerabilities from different scanners, confirms that all findings are matched together, and makes it clear and confident that the final finding is truly a vulnerability requiring action. Regarding automation features, Kondukto is fully automated and fully integrated with a plug and play approach. In terms of integration with DevOps pipelines, the benefit is that Kondukto itself is not an integration tool. The DAST tool is integrated, and I can manage the scanner. The tool itself, whether it is DAST or SAST, will be integrated with DevOps and other tools like notification tools, SIEM, and SOC. The scanner tool itself will be managed under Kondukto, but Kondukto does not provide integration. There is no need because the scanner itself will integrate with other tools.

Read full review

Yash Shende

Software Development Engineer II at Rocket Software

Monthly scans have provided baseline security but still miss critical vulnerabilities

Veracode can improve to stand in this market. They do not have to do much; they just need to improve their UI experience and add more documentation within the application rather than just creating documentation pages on different websites. They need to ensure their web application guides whoever uses it. Since whoever uses Veracode must be a technical person, they just need to guide them to the actual points. They can also improve their security capabilities by adding more filters to identify what vulnerabilities their application has. They need to improve their scanning engine to scan for more critical defects. Also, the integration part can be enhanced by adding features to integrate with a CLI, such as introducing a CLI version or a Jenkins plugin. If such features exist, they should show it as a pop-up, signaling that they have a new feature. Currently, it feels Veracode from two years ago is still the same, so that is something Veracode needs to improve. They can improve the security part. Some of the severe security issues were never caught by Veracode in the reports. In fact, I have never seen any high or critical severity issues pop up in my Veracode report. That is one thing they can improve on their scanning ability to catch high severity issues. Next is integration; Veracode does not provide any tools to integrate with Jenkins or CLI. I do not even know if there is any CLI for Veracode that I can use to automate in my pipeline. The last thing is the UI interface that they have, as it is a bit confusing. I remember we did not have the capability to handle authentications of our internal application. We had to write Selenium code using a Selenium IDE. To write a Selenium script for a Veracode scan, you have to download a Selenium IDE, record it, and then paste that file into Veracode. I can see that Selenium IDE is already decommissioned, so it is no longer used by anyone. Still, we have to use it because Veracode only supports that kind of file for Selenium to automate. They can add more ways to authenticate our application using normal JavaScript or Python or Shell script. I feel these are the four main points. They can document it more by adding tooltips into the application that explain why a parameter is required and what other options are available. For the same example with the Selenium script, they can add a link to their documentation that explains what other kinds of scripts can be written for authentication. I feel they can also make the UI more intuitive so that whoever uses it can guide themselves, as whoever uses Veracode is already a technical person.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kondukto helps consolidate security findings by correlating them to minimize false positives and giving customers a complete and clear vision of high critical findings in an easy way."

"The static analysis gives you deep insights into problems."

"They actually help you every single step of the way and they want to show you how to do it."

"It is scalable and quick to deploy into the site and the pipelines. The reports and analytics are good, and the false positive rate is low. It gives true results."

"All the features provided by Veracode are valuable, including static scan, dynamic scan, and MPT (Manual Penetration Testing)."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its extensive reporting capabilities and user-friendly interface."

"What we found most valuable in Veracode is the ability to do automatic scans of our software. We've incorporated the solution into our SDLC process, so we take our builds before they get released and put them through scans to ensure any new vulnerabilities haven't occurred."

"It allows us to prove our security levels to vendors, and additionally helps us with our HIPAA security policies."

"The product helped improve our organization by helping us to identify potential problems in applications and fix them before they were used in a way that they should not be, and in essence, it helped enhance our security."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"The primary concerns I have are that it is somewhat expensive, support would rate as seven, and there were licensing activation issues."

"Some features could be improved in terms of user-friendliness."

"It's very expensive for a small organization."

"The scanning on the UI portion of our applications is straightforward, but folks were having challenges with scans that involved microservices. They had to rope in an expert to have it sorted."

"The scans were sometimes not accurate in version 2022. There were some false positives in the vulnerability reports. We used to get false positives, and we were responsible for checking all of the alerts and determining whether they were true positives or false positives. They might have already improved it. If they have not, they can look into how to mitigate false positives."

"In my opinion, Veracode lacks significantly in most parts, including its UI, its reporting, ease of use, and the features that it provides."

"A nice addition would be if it could be extended for scenarios with custom cleansers."

"The training lab is not very user-friendly and takes a long time to set up."

"All areas of the solution could use some improvement."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Its pricing is fair."

"I'm unfamiliar with the solution's pricing, but it must be worth the cost from a company perspective, as we have been using it for years and have no plans to move away from it."

"Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."

"It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

"The pricing for Veracode is high, making it difficult for beginners to afford."

"We are still considering it at the enterprise level. It has a subscription-based model. We find its price a little high based on the features it provides."

"I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others."

"The price of Veracode Static Analysis is expensive. There is an annual fee to use the solution and the company is upfront with the pricing model and fees."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	70
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	114

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode Static Analysis?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Veracode is that it is fairly moderate.

See all answers

Comparisons

Snyk vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

DefectDojo vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

SonarQube vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Data Theorem API Secure vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Aikido Security vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Kondukto [EOL] Competitors

SonarQube vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 5% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Veracode

Compared 3% of the time

GitLab vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

Invicti vs Veracode

Compared 2% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Kondukto [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Veracode

September 2026

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

No data available

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Kondukto offers robust solutions designed for advanced security in software development. It centralizes vulnerability management, enhancing efficiency for teams and improving the security posture across projects.

As a comprehensive platform, Kondukto streamlines vulnerability management by integrating with existing development tools to automate and simplify processes. It informs users promptly about potential security threats, enabling swift risk mitigation. Kondukto caters to enterprises by providing essential insights and high adaptability in software environments.

What are the core features of Kondukto?

Integration Compatibility: Seamlessly aligns with popular development tools, ensuring a smooth workflow.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort by automating repetitive tasks related to security checks.
Risk Assessment: Offers detailed reports on vulnerabilities, assisting in prioritizing security fixes.
Custom Alerts: Configurable notifications to keep teams informed about significant security developments.

Why consider Kondukto?

Efficiency Boost: Streamlined processes lead to faster threat identification and resolution.
Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring maintains a high level of security assurance.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprises with expanding needs.

Kondukto is utilized in industries like finance and healthcare, where data protection is crucial. Its implementation focuses on integrating within existing ecosystems to strengthen security protocols without disrupting workflow. By providing relevant insights, it aids businesses in maintaining compliance and managing risk effectively.

Invicti

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Veracode

Sample Customers

Trendyol, Ödeal

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors and best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.