ManageEngine Log360 vs syslog-ng comparison

ManageEngine and One Identity are both solutions in the Log Management category. ManageEngine is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.8, while One Identity is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to One Identity’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

5,190 Views
3,010 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

syslog-ng

Read 7 syslog-ng reviews

3,780 Views
3,742 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

syslog-ng

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and syslog-ng are prominent tools in the log management sector. ManageEngine Log360 seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while syslog-ng is favored for its robust features and flexibility.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 offers comprehensive integration capabilities, ease of use, and a smooth monitoring experience. Syslog-ng is favored for its flexibility, advanced filtering capabilities, and ability to handle complex data requirements efficiently.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 could enhance alert customization, improve reporting features, and expand its feature set. Syslog-ng users suggest better documentation, a more intuitive configuration process, and enhanced interface usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 is recognized for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Syslog-ng offers flexible deployment options but involves a more complex setup, which is suitable for larger configurations.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is considered cost-effective, offering competitive pricing and quick ROI. Syslog-ng is perceived as more expensive, but the advanced features justify the investment for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

syslog-ng

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of syslog-ng is 1.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
syslog-ng	1.4%
ManageEngine Log360	1.3%
Other	97.3%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Burak Karakurt

Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.

Has fulfilled regulatory requirements through centralized log management

The alerting capabilities in ManageEngine Log360 needed work for creating alarms for the cases where alarms were needed and for prioritizing the alarms for criticality. ManageEngine Log360 uses PostgreSQL as its own database but does not automatically parse and allow creation of alarms the way it does in MS SQL. There is less support in PostgreSQL than in MS SQL. The ability to create alarms based on parsed data in the same way MS SQL does would have been beneficial and would have saved considerable time. On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work. This support is needed, and I am sure many companies need this support on PostgreSQL. MS SQL features that were missing in ManageEngine Log360 that should be included in the future are those that automatically parse an MS SQL database and provide options for setting alarms. On the PostgreSQL side, this is not the same. At minimum, PostgreSQL support should reach the MS SQL level of features and support that ManageEngine Log360 presents.

Read full review

Oliver Castellucchio

IT Infrastructure & Cloud Security Manager at Thux

Has ensured compliance by centralizing log data and supporting secure connections

We currently do not use that feature. We currently have just an open-source release, not a premium release. My boss has indicated that he wants to buy a premium syslog-ng version next month. I think we can use other features of this tool in the future. In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."

"We haven't had any stability issues."

"ManageEngine Log360 is a comprehensive solution, including event log analysis for Microsoft 365."

"The Sharecon feature is the most valuable."

"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."

"It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy."

"We can use a single toolchain for more than one purpose altogether and manage them from one administrative console."

"If the client does not have much knowledge regarding the SOC and cyber, then ManageEngine Log360 is good because you can get default reports."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

"For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior."

"Syslog-ng has a separate config file in addition to the core configuration."

"We chose syslog-ng because it is easy to install, easy to maintain, easy to update, and due to the fact that all data arrive in raw format, we can manipulate it as we want."

"What I appreciate most about syslog-ng is its configuration; its C-style config is much easier to understand, read, and write than other popular solutions such as syslog or rsyslog."

"Syslog-ng provides easy access to all my logs. It helps me show managers and other clients precisely where an incident occurred. I also like it because you can integrate syslog-ng with multiple solutions to allow real-time monitoring."

"Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

"The ability to extract and store the logs is the most valuable feature of syslog-ng."

Cons

"We are always facing more difficulties right now because we are learning."

"The on-premises solution is very slow. When I move to another tab inside Log360 or in the SIEM, even if my system is running on 36 GB and with a high processor, it takes a lot of time to get into the alert page or the search page."

"With ManageEngine, you need to actually have an idea of what you want to do with the information you're looking at. It doesn't drive you in the direction — that's a con."

"On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work."

"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."

"ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting."

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."

"I haven't had very good support from those guys."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

"The filtering has room for improvement."

"There is always the potential for additional integration and protocol extensions."

"In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it."

"It's hard to find people who know how to use syslog-ng. I often find problems with configurations, and solutions aren't integrated correctly with syslog-ng. For example, there might be data with extra decimals, or the collector agents are incorrectly named. It isn't a problem with the solution; it's a lack of professionals."

"There is room for improvement in terms of observability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

"Syslog-ng is a free open-source solution."

"Syslog-ng is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with syslog-ng?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for syslog-ng?

In Italy, we have to be compliant with the Garante for privacy. We have to log every login, logout, or login failure made by a system administrator. We store all syslog data of the infrastructure. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering syslog-ng?

When it comes to parsing, I can parse both structured and unstructured data, though our data are only structured. Currently, we collect all data we receive as raw data. Each file is stored for each...

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 10% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 3% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Graylog Enterprise vs syslog-ng

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs syslog-ng

Compared 10% of the time

Cribl vs syslog-ng

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana Loki vs syslog-ng

Compared 5% of the time

Axiom Team vs syslog-ng

Compared 3% of the time

More syslog-ng Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

June 2026

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Buyer's Guide

syslog-ng

May 2026

Download syslog-ng product report

Overview

ManageEngine Log360 offers comprehensive log management and security alerting, integrating advanced analytics for threat detection and compliance reporting. Scalable for on-premise and hybrid deployments, it facilitates incident response with seamless system integration and user-friendly monitoring.

ManageEngine Log360 enhances visibility across IT infrastructures by aggregating logs from Active Directory, file servers, and network devices, aiding in security incident detection with User Behavior Analytics and threat identification tools. Its modular approach supports compliance in vital sectors such as aerospace, contributing significantly to centralized monitoring and anomaly detection. By reducing manual log examination, Log360 aligns with both security and operational goals across diverse environments, though areas like integration with Active Directory and interface improvements are avenues for advancement. Streamlining data retention and expanding automation are priorities for its evolution, ensuring effective incident management with reduced administrative burdens.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Log360?

Security Monitoring: Active detection and logging of security threats across networks.
User Behavior Analytics: Identifies anomalies and potential threats in user activity.
Compliance Reporting: Facilitates adherence to industry regulations with detailed reports.
Unified Dashboard: Provides a comprehensive view for effective incident response.
Agentless Monitoring: Minimizes system overhead while maintaining oversight.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
Simplified Management: Reduces manual log analysis and management workload.
Integration Capabilities: Aids in cohesive operations across various environments.
Compliance Support: Ensures industry-standard regulatory adherence.

In sectors like aerospace, Log360 supports compliance demands by integrating log management for enhanced security and regulatory reporting. Its adaptability to on-premises and hybrid structures makes it valuable for technology-driven environments, where security and efficiency are paramount.

ManageEngine

Syslog-ng is recognized for its proficiency in log extraction, storage, and secure TLS connections. Its efficient configuration and real-time monitoring integration make it a preferred option for large-scale log processing, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

Syslog-ng offers powerful log management capabilities, accommodating complex search needs while maintaining simplicity with user-friendly documentation and real-time monitoring features. The C-style configuration enhances readability, allowing users to easily comprehend and implement changes. Designed for high performance, Syslog-ng scales effectively to handle extensive logging demands. Despite its strengths, areas for improvement include integration with protocols and filtering methods. Users advocate for better Kafka integration and a graphical configuration interface to simplify setup. While historical dissatisfaction led to custom patches, subsequent updates have addressed these concerns. Currently, users seek an advanced version to access premium functionalities.

What are the most important features of syslog-ng?

Log Extraction and Storage: Streamlined processes for efficient data handling.
TLS-Supported Secure Connections: Ensures secure data transmission over networks.
Real-Time Monitoring Integration: Enhances proactive decision-making capabilities.
"C-Style" Configuration: Improves readability and simplifies setup for users.
High-Performance Log Processing: Supports large-scale environments with ease.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating syslog-ng?

Easy Configuration: Reduces time and complexity for initial setup and adjustments.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates adherence to data regulations in Brazil and Italy.
Intuitive Examples and Documentation: Simplifies user training and onboarding.
Smooth Multi-Server Setups: Enables efficient deployment across multiple servers.

Organizations frequently use syslog-ng for log aggregation, filtering, and regulatory compliance, serving as a crucial component in enterprise security audits and data regulation adherence in Brazil and Italy. By allowing logs to be stored in raw format, syslog-ng provides versatility in data manipulation and user activity tracking, making it user-friendly for installation, maintenance, and updates. Logs can be transmitted over TLS or plain text to central servers, supporting varied transmission needs.

One Identity

Sample Customers

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Tecnocom, University of Victoria, University of Exeter, Datapath

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng

June 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.