Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
syslog-ng Logo

Top 10 syslog-ng Alternatives

Vendor: One Identity
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top syslog-ng Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to syslog-ng based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Datadog, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

syslog-ng surpasses its competitors by delivering versatile log management with exceptional scalability, robust filtering, and seamless integration capabilities, ensuring high performance and reliability for complex IT environments, making it a preferred choice for businesses seeking efficient log processing solutions.

One Identity Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with One Identity, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
syslog-ng Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Syslog-ng offers advanced log collection and filtering, ideal for environments requiring scalability and platform compatibility. In comparison, Wazuh provides integrated threat detection and compliance management, appealing to those needing a comprehensive security solution with SIEM functionalities and extensive support options.
Download Wazuh vs. syslog-ng Report
Syslog-ng involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for enterprises, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Syslog-ng involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for enterprises, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
syslog-ng Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive integration, real-time monitoring, and advanced analytics ideal for complex environments. In comparison, syslog-ng specializes in high-performance log management, making it suitable for those focusing on log handling over broader functionalities. Datadog's comprehensive features contrast with syslog-ng's cost-effective log-specific expertise.
Download Datadog vs. syslog-ng Report
Datadog setup costs are generally higher compared to syslog-ng, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog setup costs are generally higher compared to syslog-ng, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust analytics and integration, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, syslog-ng is efficient in log management, being cost-effective for specific needs. Tech buyers choose Splunk for advanced analytics, while syslog-ng appeals for straightforward setup and focused log capabilities.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. syslog-ng Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which is often noted for its lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which is often noted for its lower initial expenses.
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive cybersecurity insights. In comparison, syslog-ng focuses on streamlined log management. QRadar suits large organizations needing detailed security operations, while syslog-ng appeals to those prioritizing cost-effective log collection and faster deployment.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. syslog-ng Report
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
syslog-ng Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security emphasizes usability and seamless deployment, appealing to those seeking robust security analytics with lower setup costs. In comparison, syslog-ng's advanced log management and filtering options attract organizations needing detailed log solutions, despite its potential for higher costs and technical demands.
Download Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng Report
Elastic Security features a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas syslog-ng involves more complex installation processes and potentially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security features a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas syslog-ng involves more complex installation processes and potentially higher setup expenses.
syslog-ng Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Syslog-ng excels in advanced log filtering and robust processing, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Grafana Loki offers seamless integration with Grafana dashboards, providing scalable visualization and analysis, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effective deployment and integration with existing tools.
Download Grafana Loki vs. syslog-ng Report
Syslog-ng has a lower initial setup cost, while Grafana Loki provides cost-effective scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Syslog-ng has a lower initial setup cost, while Grafana Loki provides cost-effective scalability.
syslog-ng Logo
Graylog
4.0 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Graylog
4.0 out of 5
Graylog attracts tech buyers with its user-friendly setup and competitive pricing, suitable for small to medium businesses. In comparison, syslog-ng's broad protocol support and high-performance ingestion appeal to enterprises needing robust features, justifying its higher price point and complex deployment.
Download Graylog vs. syslog-ng Report
Graylog's setup cost is competitive and often deemed budget-friendly, while syslog-ng tends to be higher, reflecting its robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Graylog's setup cost is competitive and often deemed budget-friendly, while syslog-ng tends to be higher, reflecting its robust features.
syslog-ng Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM excels in comprehensive security features for enterprises needing advanced threat detection. In comparison, syslog-ng offers efficient log management for those prioritizing streamlined data processing. LogRhythm SIEM is ideal for reducing security risks, while syslog-ng appeals to budget-conscious organizations seeking modular solutions.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. syslog-ng Report
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher initial setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of syslog-ng, highlighting a key financial difference between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher initial setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of syslog-ng, highlighting a key financial difference between these solutions.
syslog-ng Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5

Syslog-ng offers an affordable and straightforward deployment, ideal for log collection with high data throughput and simple setup. In comparison, Elastic Stack provides comprehensive data analysis with advanced features and scalability, suitable for organizations seeking detailed insights and advanced analytics capabilities.

Download Elastic Stack vs. syslog-ng Report
Syslog-ng features a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Stack requires a more complex initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Syslog-ng features a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Stack requires a more complex initial setup.
syslog-ng Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Amazon CloudWatch excels in AWS integration and scalability, appealing to those needing seamless cloud-native operations. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility and comprehensive log management, attracting buyers seeking customizable solutions for diverse sources with strong data parsing capabilities.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. syslog-ng Report
Amazon CloudWatch offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas syslog-ng may involve complex initial setup expenses. This contrast highlights CloudWatch's simplicity in cost setup compared to the potentially higher complexity and cost for syslog-ng.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon CloudWatch offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas syslog-ng may involve complex initial setup expenses. This contrast highlights CloudWatch's simplicity in cost setup compared to the potentially higher complexity and cost for syslog-ng.
syslog-ng Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5

Syslog-ng and Cribl Stream are competing products aimed at log management and data processing tasks. Users are happier with the pricing and support of syslog-ng, but Cribl Stream is seen as a superior product due to its advanced features and user reviews indicate it is worth the price.

Download Cribl vs. syslog-ng Report
Syslog-ng is appreciated for its lower setup costs and satisfactory return on investment due to predictable pricing models. Cribl Stream has higher setup costs but users feel justified by the extensive features and better long-term ROI. The key difference is syslog-ng’s affordability, w...
View comparison
Pricing
Syslog-ng is appreciated for its lower setup costs and satisfactory return on investment due to predictable pricing models. Cribl Stream has higher setup costs but users feel justified by the extensive features and better long-term ROI. The key difference is syslog-ng’s affordability, w...
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is valued for comprehensive analysis, reporting tools, and cost-effectiveness in medium to large enterprises. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility and scalability, appealing to users with complex environments seeking customization despite its higher setup costs and longer ROI timeline.
Download Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. syslog-ng Report
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer typically involves an upfront setup cost, offering advanced analytics and reporting, while syslog-ng often has lower initial costs, making it a budget-friendly choice for basic log management needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer typically involves an upfront setup cost, offering advanced analytics and reporting, while syslog-ng often has lower initial costs, making it a budget-friendly choice for basic log management needs.
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
4.0 out of 5
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server attracts buyers with simplicity, affordability, and quick deployment. In comparison, syslog-ng offers advanced features and flexibility suitable for complex environments. A tech buyer might prefer Kiwi for ease of use or syslog-ng for comprehensive functionality and scalability.
Download SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs. syslog-ng Report
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while syslog-ng presents a more complex setup requiring higher initial investment. The simpler setup process of Kiwi may attract budget-conscious users compared to syslog-ng's comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers a straightforward setup at a lower cost, while syslog-ng presents a more complex setup requiring higher initial investment. The simpler setup process of Kiwi may attract budget-conscious users compared to syslog-ng's comprehensive features.
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
ManageEngine Log360 provides integrated solutions for log management and security, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive protection. In comparison, syslog-ng supports diverse data types with advanced log processing, ideal for high-performance environments requiring detailed log handling and willing to invest in higher initial costs.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. syslog-ng Report
ManageEngine Log360 has a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which offers a more budget-friendly initiation. syslog-ng might appeal to cost-conscious users, while ManageEngine Log360 caters to those willing to invest more upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Log360 has a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, which offers a more budget-friendly initiation. syslog-ng might appeal to cost-conscious users, while ManageEngine Log360 caters to those willing to invest more upfront.
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
4.1 out of 5
VMware Aria Operations for Logs excels within VMware environments with its competitive pricing and integration capabilities. In comparison, syslog-ng is a preferred option for its extensive features and cross-platform flexibility, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive log management beyond VMware infrastructure.
Download VMware Aria Operations for Logs vs. syslog-ng Report
VMware Aria Operations for Logs typically incurs higher setup costs, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Operations for Logs typically incurs higher setup costs, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
syslog-ng Logo
Nagios Log Server
4.0 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Nagios Log Server
4.0 out of 5
Nagios Log Server offers intuitive setup and robust alerting, ideal for small to medium IT teams. In comparison, syslog-ng impresses with its unmatched scalability and versatility, suiting complex enterprise needs despite higher costs, thanks to its powerful features and advanced filtering options.
Download Nagios Log Server vs. syslog-ng Report
Nagios Log Server has a straightforward setup cost, whereas syslog-ng requires more detailed configuration expenses, highlighting a key difference in initial financial outlay between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios Log Server has a straightforward setup cost, whereas syslog-ng requires more detailed configuration expenses, highlighting a key difference in initial financial outlay between the two solutions.
syslog-ng Logo
ArcSight Logger
3.8 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
ArcSight Logger
3.8 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in integration and comprehensive log analysis, appealing to those prioritizing efficient deployment and robust support. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility with advanced filtering and scalability, suiting buyers valuing modular deployment and adaptability for complex environments, despite potential initial costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. syslog-ng Report
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
syslog-ng Logo
Logz.io
4.1 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Logz.io
4.1 out of 5
Logz.io excels with AI-driven analytics and cloud-based deployment, appealing to those seeking modern ease. In comparison, syslog-ng's protocol support and filtering cater to users prioritizing robust logging control. Logz.io offers scalability; syslog-ng provides cost-effective open-source flexibility.
Download Logz.io vs. syslog-ng Report
Logz.io offers a flexible setup cost, while syslog-ng typically requires a higher initial investment. This difference in setup cost presents Logz.io as a more budget-friendly option compared to syslog-ng.
View comparison
Pricing
Logz.io offers a flexible setup cost, while syslog-ng typically requires a higher initial investment. This difference in setup cost presents Logz.io as a more budget-friendly option compared to syslog-ng.
syslog-ng Logo
Logstash
4.5 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Logstash
4.5 out of 5
Logstash efficiently collects, processes, and transforms data for centralized logging and analysis. It offers valuable features such as powerful data parsing capabilities and support for various input and output plugins. Improvement is needed in documentation clarity and performance under high loads to enhance user experience.
Download Logstash vs. syslog-ng Report
View comparison
syslog-ng Logo
Snare
4.0 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
Snare
4.0 out of 5
Snare offers ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness for organizations with constrained IT resources. In comparison, syslog-ng provides comprehensive features and robust support, appealing to enterprises requiring extensive customization and scalability for complex environments. Each solution targets different organizational needs and budget priorities.
Download Snare vs. syslog-ng Report
Snare has a lower setup cost compared to syslog-ng, making it a more budget-friendly option for smaller-scale implementations. Meanwhile, syslog-ng offers more robust features for enterprises despite its higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Snare has a lower setup cost compared to syslog-ng, making it a more budget-friendly option for smaller-scale implementations. Meanwhile, syslog-ng offers more robust features for enterprises despite its higher initial expense.
syslog-ng Logo
syslog-ng Logo
SolarWinds Log Analyzer
1 out of 5

Log and event collection and analysis
Powerful search and filter
Real-time log stream
Event log tagging
Flat log file ingestion
Orion Platform integration

SolarWinds Log Analyzer is a cheap product.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Log Analyzer is a cheap product.
syslog-ng Logo
LogLogic
3.0 out of 5
syslog-ng Logo
LogLogic
3.0 out of 5
LogLogic appeals with cost-effectiveness, strong support, and intuitive deployment, making it ideal for budget-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, syslog-ng offers exceptional scalability, integration, and advanced capabilities, appealing to those willing to invest in flexible, complex environment adaptability.
Download LogLogic vs. syslog-ng Report
LogLogic incurs a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, making it less budget-friendly for initial implementation. In contrast, syslog-ng offers a more economical setup, providing a cost-effective entry point for system logging solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
LogLogic incurs a higher setup cost compared to syslog-ng, making it less budget-friendly for initial implementation. In contrast, syslog-ng offers a more economical setup, providing a cost-effective entry point for system logging solutions.

Related categories

Log Management
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)