Elastic Security vs syslog-ng comparison

Elastic and One Identity are both solutions in the Log Management category. Elastic is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while One Identity is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. Elastic holds a 3.0% mindshare in Log Management, compared to One Identity’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Elastic Security

Read 66 Elastic Security reviews

11,636 Views
5,469 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

syslog-ng

Read 7 syslog-ng reviews

3,430 Views
3,430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Security

syslog-ng

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Elastic Security and syslog-ng compete in the operational security category. Elastic Security seems to have the upper hand due to its robust security framework and advanced analytical features.

Features: Elastic Security provides advanced threat detection, a wide range of integration capabilities, and a comprehensive security framework. Syslog-ng focuses on effective log collection, high-performance data filtering, and efficient data processing.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security could enhance scalability, reduce its resource-heavy nature, and improve performance optimization. Syslog-ng could benefit from more user-friendly settings, enhanced support documentation, and improved user accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security requires significant deployment effort, often involving technical expertise and time, whereas syslog-ng offers a quicker setup but lacks robust customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is considered expensive, with mixed views on ROI due to its comprehensive features. Syslog-ng is generally viewed as cost-effective, providing a good balance between cost and functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security

Ranking in Log Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (15th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

syslog-ng

Ranking in Log Management

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 3.0%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of syslog-ng is 1.8%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Security	3.0%
syslog-ng	1.8%
Other	95.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Laurentiu Popescu

Chief Product Officer at ClusterPower

Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows

The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.

Read full review

Oliver Castellucchio

IT Infrastructure & Cloud Security Manager at Thux

Has ensured compliance by centralizing log data and supporting secure connections

We currently do not use that feature. We currently have just an open-source release, not a premium release. My boss has indicated that he wants to buy a premium syslog-ng version next month. I think we can use other features of this tool in the future. In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance is good and it is faster than IBM QRadar."

"It is very quick to react. I can set it to check anomalies or suspicious behavior every 30 seconds. It is very fast."

"Elastic Security actually has a very good cost-benefit ratio compared to other vendors in the market."

"It is the best open-source product for people working in SO, managing and analyzing logs."

"Elastic Security makes data communication easier."

"I can look at events from more than one source across multiple different locations and find patterns or anomalies. The machine learning capabilities are helpful, and I can create rules for notifications to be more proactive rather than responding after something has gone wrong."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to collect authentication information from service providers."

"The scalability is good. It can be scaled easily in the production environment."

More Elastic Security pros

"The ability to extract and store the logs is the most valuable feature of syslog-ng."

"What I appreciate most about syslog-ng is its configuration; its C-style config is much easier to understand, read, and write than other popular solutions such as syslog or rsyslog."

"For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior."

"Syslog-ng provides easy access to all my logs. It helps me show managers and other clients precisely where an incident occurred. I also like it because you can integrate syslog-ng with multiple solutions to allow real-time monitoring."

"Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

"Syslog-ng has a separate config file in addition to the core configuration."

"We chose syslog-ng because it is easy to install, easy to maintain, easy to update, and due to the fact that all data arrive in raw format, we can manipulate it as we want."

Cons

"If you compare this with CrowdStrike or Carbon Black, they can improve."

"Its documentation should be a bit better. I have to spend at least a couple of hours to find the solution for a simple thing. When we buy Elastic, training is not included for free with Elastic. We have to pay extra for the training. They should include training in the price."

"The solution's basic setup takes time, and a lot of effort is required from the beginning to make it actually work."

"Technical support could respond faster."

"Authentication is not a default in Kibana. We need to have another tool to have authentication and authorization. These two should be part of Kibana."

"It's a little bit of a learning curve to understand the logic of searching for things and trying to find what you're looking for in Elastic Security."

"There are connectors to gather logs for Windows PCs and Linux PCs, but if we have to get the logs from Syslog then we have to do it manually, and this should be automated."

"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."

More Elastic Security cons

"There is always the potential for additional integration and protocol extensions."

"In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it."

"Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

"There is room for improvement in terms of observability."

"It's hard to find people who know how to use syslog-ng. I often find problems with configurations, and solutions aren't integrated correctly with syslog-ng. For example, there might be data with extra decimals, or the collector agents are incorrectly named. It isn't a problem with the solution; it's a lack of professionals."

"The filtering has room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."

"The price is reasonable. It probably costs the same as ArcSight and LogRhythm SIEM. FortiSIEM might cost less than Elastic Security. There are no hidden or additional costs."

"Its price is fine. Its licensing works on a yearly basis. We have to renew the license every year. I also have a good experience with Darktrace. When we buy Darktrace, we get training free of cost, which is not there in Elastic. We have to pay extra for training. There is certainly room for improvement."

"There is no charge for using the open-source version."

"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."

"Compared to other products such as Dynatrace, this is one of the cheaper options."

"Compared to other tools, Elastic Security is a cheaper solution."

"I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10."

More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice

"Syslog-ng is open-source."

"Syslog-ng is a free open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Elastic Security?

Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?

I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with syslog-ng?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for syslog-ng?

In Italy, we have to be compliant with the Garante for privacy. We have to log every login, logout, or login failure made by a system administrator. We store all syslog data of the infrastructure. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering syslog-ng?

When it comes to parsing, I can parse both structured and unstructured data, though our data are only structured. Currently, we collect all data we receive as raw data. Each file is stored for each...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Elastic Security Competitors

Graylog Enterprise vs syslog-ng

Compared 17% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs syslog-ng

Compared 14% of the time

Cribl vs syslog-ng

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana Loki vs syslog-ng

Compared 6% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs syslog-ng

Compared 2% of the time

More syslog-ng Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security

March 2026

Download Elastic Security product report

Buyer's Guide

syslog-ng

February 2026

Download syslog-ng product report

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash

No data available

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.

Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Optimizing SIEM
syslog-ng is the log management solution that improves the performance of your SIEM solution by reducing the amount and improving the quality of data feeding your SIEM.

Rapid search and troubleshooting
With syslog-ng Store Box, you can find the answer. Search billions of logs in seconds using full text queries with Boolean operators to pinpoint critical logs.

Meeting compliance requirements
syslog-ng Store Box provides secure, tamper-proof storage and custom reporting to demonstrate compliance.

Big data ingestion
syslog-ng can deliver data from a wide variety of sources to Hadoop, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, and Kafka as well as many others.

Universal log collection and routing
syslog-ng flexibly routes log data from X sources to Y destinations. Instead of deploying multiple agents on hosts, organizations can unify their log data collection and management.

Secure data archive
syslog-ng Store Box provides automated archiving, tamper-proof encrypted storage, granular access controls to protect log data. The largest appliance can store up to 10TB of raw logs.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care

Tecnocom, University of Victoria, University of Exeter, Datapath

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng

March 2026

Free Report: Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Security vs. syslog-ng report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.