ManageEngine OpManager vs NetMon comparison

ManageEngine and Exabeam are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.2, while Exabeam is ranked #50 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Exabeam’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

7,680 Views
7,373 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

NetMon

Read 12 NetMon reviews

3,492 Views
2,794 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

ManageEngine OpManager and NetMon are key players in the network monitoring solutions category. ManageEngine OpManager seems to have the upper hand due to its competitive pricing and broad feature set, making it more suitable for diverse business environments, whereas NetMon's higher cost and focus on advanced analytics cater to larger enterprises.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers File Integrity Monitoring and Security Information and Event Management features. It includes comprehensive monitoring of network devices like servers and workstations, automating responses with advanced alerts for real-time failure predictions. NetMon excels in traffic analysis and provides detailed network visibility, making it highly effective for threat detection in cybersecurity contexts.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance stability, documentation, and AI capabilities to further automate network improvements. Its pricing model can be clearer. NetMon should focus on better integration with third-party tools and consider reducing its cost to attract a broader audience. Both need better user support and documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers flexibility with both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, although customer service could be improved, particularly during non-standard hours. NetMon, generally requiring on-premises setups, limits deployment flexibility with customer service also lacking 24/7 support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is known for competitive pricing and a notable return on investment owing to lower long-term costs and comprehensive support with no additional fees. NetMon's high price reflects its advanced features tailoring to larger enterprises, making ManageEngine OpManager more attractive for cost-conscious organizations due to its affordability and effective functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetMon is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.5%
NetMon	0.7%
Other	97.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Llahir Albar

Technical Solution Specialist at Crypto-gen

Has helped centrally manage users and assets while making operational tasks more efficient

The main drawback is there is less documentation available, both public documentation and partner-available documentation. The learning materials are very limited, and there is also a limitation of support SLA. It takes a huge amount of time to resolve certain issues when ManageEngine OpManager technical support gets involved. The expertise of support is limited. Reporting could be improved with more details. The content and richness can be improved on the reports. To make ManageEngine OpManager a better product, the first priority is improving the after-sales support and learning materials for local engineers and partners to enhance their capacities and expertise. The second priority is improving the product itself, including dashboards and reporting enrichment. Lastly, new feature adoption such as DLP or endpoint monitoring should be considered. Features that should be offered include DLP, Privileged User Access, data classification, and MDR. These are features that can be groomed around the MMS if properly configured.

Read full review

SumitRangari

Pan India IT Infrastructure Management / End-user Services at Tata Group

Has supported real-time event detection and reporting accuracy while database integration has required extra effort

Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time. However, currently, it is not giving many challenges.It is difficult to integrate NetMon with other databases. We can customize NetMon's monitoring views, but it is done by the team who handles it, as it is outsourced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is useful for SNMP monitoring."

"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."

"Our customers are seeing a clear return on investment with ManageEngine OpManager, which is why they continue using it and maintain the solution for a long time."

"The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The solution's most valuable features are reporting, event notifications, and alert management."

"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."

"Easy and agentless to deploy, service and support is excellent."

"ManageEngine OpManager has given us the ability to monitor real-time performance, and positions of our virtual machines and host machines, helping us minimize the amount of time it takes to manage them by allowing us to monitor all machines through a single dashboard instead of going to them one by one."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"Compared to many other products in the market, I think LogRhythm has the highest cost to performance ratio in terms of its value."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

"We were sold on the product based on the fairly narrow use cases that the sales reps gave us, and what we're seeing during our usage is that we can get there, and we're very excited about the potential."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

More NetMon pros

Cons

"We have been facing an issue since last year when a lot of our users started to work from home through their mobiles or computers. We are having trouble reaching these devices. We are now planning to publish our instance to the cloud so that we can reach these devices. Its performance should be improved in terms of the discovery of the devices. I would like to feel confident with the discovery that this solution does. For example, on my dashboard, I would like to be able to view a list of all devices seen on a specific server. At present, it is difficult to find such information. This would be an excellent feature to have."

"ManageEngine OpManager could improve by having a better cloud presence."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."

"The pricing of the solution is high."

"There are some concerns with the recording performance of ManageEngine OpManager. It does not offer accurate monitoring when compared to SolarWinds."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"One thing that surprised me was the current version of LogRhythm does not natively support Windows 2016."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"Their technical support isn't so great."

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"Our customers would always like to see additional features."

More NetMon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"We have a standard license for ManageEngine OpManager. We purchased the license for one year and now we are upgrading it soon."

"It is reasonably priced."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

13%

Transportation Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm NetMon?

We have outsourced our SIEM solutions at the moment, and we are using it.We have been using LogRhythm in our organization as a SaaS offering. We have outsourced it as part of the actual scope where...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LogRhythm NetMon?

We use AWS as our cloud provider in a private cloud environment.It completely depends upon when incidents happen. To find the root cause analysis, we need to first gather the logs from the team. It...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 10% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

ScienceLogic vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NetMon

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

Vectra AI vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

ObserverLIVE vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

More NetMon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

July 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

NetMon

July 2026

Download NetMon product report

Also Known As

OpManager

LogRhythm Network Monitor

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager offers real-time network performance monitoring and reporting. Known for its customizable dashboards and topology maps, it supports device monitoring and alerting, enhanced by features like Firewall Analyzer and NetFlow.

Designed for network infrastructure management, ManageEngine OpManager monitors servers, devices, applications, and security across on-premise and cloud environments. Adaptive thresholds and automation simplify proactive monitoring, while issues with dashboard design, business view enhancements, performance stability in large deployments, and licensing warrant attention. Its machine learning and AI could be more advanced. Despite these, organizations use its comprehensive dashboards for real-time insights into CPU, RAM, and disk utilization, receiving notifications for unauthorized requests or performance issues.

What are the key features of ManageEngine OpManager?

Network Reporting: Provides detailed reports for network performance.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous monitoring of network parameters.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows for personalized dashboard setups for unique insights.
Topology Maps: Visualizes network layout for easier management.
Device Monitoring: Ensures all network devices are operating efficiently.
Automation: Streamlines network operations with automated tasks.
Firewall Analyzer: Enhances security measures and performance monitoring.
NetFlow: Analyzes bandwidth usage and traffic patterns.
Application Manager: Monitors server and application performance.

What benefits should users expect from ManageEngine OpManager?

Improved Network Performance: Real-time insights enhance network efficiency.
Proactive Alerts: Early warnings help address issues before they escalate.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies management with comprehensive integration features.
Scalability: Supports growth with multi-location deployment capabilities.

ManageEngine OpManager is widely implemented in industries requiring robust network infrastructure management. Companies in sectors with complex server and application needs benefit from its monitoring and alerting capabilities. Its ability to manage and provide insights across distributed locations makes it a valuable tool for enterprises operating in both on-premise and cloud environments.

ManageEngine

NetMon offers significant capabilities in log aggregation, traffic analysis, and real-time network insights. Its ease of use accommodates both entry-level and advanced functionalities, enhancing network visibility and threat detection.

NetMon provides seamless analytics with its real-time dashboards and advanced AI integration. The platform is designed for comprehensive monitoring and detailed analysis, making it indispensable for identifying network traffic, origins, destinations, and facilitating threat detection through lateral traffic visibility. Despite its powerful analytics and customization features, improvements in product integration, customer support, and pricing could increase its competitive edge. Connectivity, topology visualization, and server performance are areas noted for enhancement. Integration with protocols like Gflow and Netflow might alleviate agent-based restriction challenges. NetMon sends correlated data to LogRhythm SIEM for enhanced threat analysis and is used for tasks like traffic analysis and DPA.

What are NetMon's key features?

Log Aggregation: Seamless collection of diverse network logs for analysis.
Traffic Analysis: Detailed inspection of network traffic for identifying irregular patterns.
AI Integration: Advanced analytics powered by robust AI capabilities.
Customizable Dashboards: Real-time insights tailored to user requirements.
Correlation Engine: In-depth correlation of network activity for comprehensive reports.
Deep Packet Analytics: Thorough examination of data packets for granular insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Significant improvements in identifying lateral threats.
Comprehensive Insights: Complete visibility into network and user activities.
Efficient Monitoring: Real-time analytics streamline network monitoring processes.
Compliance Support: Strong integration supports adherence to compliance standards.

NetMon is widely adopted in industries requiring detailed traffic monitoring and security, such as finance and healthcare. Its capabilities in traffic type identification and correlated analysis make it essential for environments where detecting irregular patterns is critical. It's utilized for network security through comprehensive analysis and integration with SIEM systems.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Sera-Brynn

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon

August 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.