ManageEngine OpManager vs NetMon comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ManageEngine and Exabeam are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ManageEngine is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while Exabeam is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Exabeam’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 56 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

8,974 Views
8,615 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

NetMon

Read 12 NetMon reviews

4,855 Views
3,933 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

ManageEngine OpManager and NetMon are key players in the network monitoring solutions category. ManageEngine OpManager seems to have the upper hand due to its competitive pricing and broad feature set, making it more suitable for diverse business environments, whereas NetMon's higher cost and focus on advanced analytics cater to larger enterprises.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers File Integrity Monitoring and Security Information and Event Management features. It includes comprehensive monitoring of network devices like servers and workstations, automating responses with advanced alerts for real-time failure predictions. NetMon excels in traffic analysis and provides detailed network visibility, making it highly effective for threat detection in cybersecurity contexts.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager could enhance stability, documentation, and AI capabilities to further automate network improvements. Its pricing model can be clearer. NetMon should focus on better integration with third-party tools and consider reducing its cost to attract a broader audience. Both need better user support and documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine OpManager offers flexibility with both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, although customer service could be improved, particularly during non-standard hours. NetMon, generally requiring on-premises setups, limits deployment flexibility with customer service also lacking 24/7 support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is known for competitive pricing and a notable return on investment owing to lower long-term costs and comprehensive support with no additional fees. NetMon's high price reflects its advanced features tailoring to larger enterprises, making ManageEngine OpManager more attractive for cost-conscious organizations due to its affordability and effective functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetMon is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine OpManager	1.4%
NetMon	0.8%
Other	97.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ashutosh Jha

Project engineer at IT Solution india private limited

Centralized monitoring has highlighted limited device control but has improved proactive actions

I have configured adaptive thresholds on servers while using ManageEngine OpManager. If there is high CPU utilization or storage usage, the system will notify me or reset the system or reset the services. ManageEngine OpManager has multiple features that are valuable to our organization. We have integrated our firewall into ManageEngine OpManager, and it provides us notifications for firewall issues as well. ManageEngine OpManager provides an adaptive threshold feature that is very effective. The alerts and the ability to restart services or computers or end devices in ManageEngine OpManager are what I find most valuable. If we have set performance monitoring adaptive thresholds and they exceed the configured value, the system will take action automatically. We can also integrate our switches and access points and control them from ManageEngine OpManager.

Read full review

SumitRangari

Pan India IT Infrastructure Management / End-user Services at Tata Group

Has supported real-time event detection and reporting accuracy while database integration has required extra effort

Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time. However, currently, it is not giving many challenges.It is difficult to integrate NetMon with other databases. We can customize NetMon's monitoring views, but it is done by the team who handles it, as it is outsourced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our customers are seeing a clear return on investment with ManageEngine OpManager, which is why they continue using it and maintain the solution for a long time."

"In general, this product meets all our requirements, whatever our requirements are."

"You can put all of your work on there, they'll send you an email or send you a text. That functionality as a network engineer is the one I like the most. I do like the fact that we can schedule reports. That works too because that's a lot fewer spreadsheets that I have to create."

"It is easy to use and deploy."

"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."

"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."

"Alerting is the biggest asset as we can have real-time failure view and predict failures in some cases."

"The product itself is very good."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"In general, this is a good product."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"We are using NetMon's real-time traffic analysis regularly with a team of four members who effectively monitor all alerts and events, which has helped them identify whether there could be a severe incident."

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"We were sold on the product based on the fairly narrow use cases that the sales reps gave us, and what we're seeing during our usage is that we can get there, and we're very excited about the potential."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"But just having it there, it's incredibly smart, incredibly easy to use, and the breadth of information we get off it is really good for investigations for us."

"Compared to many other products in the market, I think LogRhythm has the highest cost to performance ratio in terms of its value."

More NetMon pros

Cons

"They should add more features to URL monitoring."

"The licensing model is confusing."

"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"The solution's reports need to include the number of applications consumed."

"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."

"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."

"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"Previously, it was typically every Monday that I was coming in - it would die over the weekend - and I would spend a day cleaning up databases."

"One thing that surprised me was the current version of LogRhythm does not natively support Windows 2016."

"The platform's integration features often need to be improved."

More NetMon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."

"The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution."

"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."

"The pricing is moderate."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Transportation Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

Based on my experience and use case, the setup cost and price of ManageEngine OpManager is good. However, if it were available in both on-premises and cloud versions, it would be more reliable for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

ManageEngine OpManager could improve by adding network device control capabilities. The control feature would be more helpful for our operations. Currently, there is no feature for controlling inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine OpManager?

I am using ManageEngine OpManager for network and server reliability. We have multiple locations, so integrating all location devices in ManageEngine OpManager into one single console allows us to ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm NetMon?

We have outsourced our SIEM solutions at the moment, and we are using it.We have been using LogRhythm in our organization as a SaaS offering. We have outsourced it as part of the actual scope where...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LogRhythm NetMon?

We use AWS as our cloud provider in a private cloud environment.It completely depends upon when incidents happen. To find the root cause analysis, we need to first gather the logs from the team. It...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 9% of the time

DX Spectrum vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

LibreNMS vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs NetMon

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NetMon

Compared 4% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs NetMon

Compared 4% of the time

More NetMon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

October 2026

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

NetMon

October 2026

Download NetMon product report

Also Known As

OpManager

LogRhythm Network Monitor

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager offers real-time network performance monitoring and reporting. Known for its customizable dashboards and topology maps, it supports device monitoring and alerting, enhanced by features like Firewall Analyzer and NetFlow.

Designed for network infrastructure management, ManageEngine OpManager monitors servers, devices, applications, and security across on-premise and cloud environments. Adaptive thresholds and automation simplify proactive monitoring, while issues with dashboard design, business view enhancements, performance stability in large deployments, and licensing warrant attention. Its machine learning and AI could be more advanced. Despite these, organizations use its comprehensive dashboards for real-time insights into CPU, RAM, and disk utilization, receiving notifications for unauthorized requests or performance issues.

What are the key features of ManageEngine OpManager?

Network Reporting: Provides detailed reports for network performance.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers continuous monitoring of network parameters.
Customizable Dashboards: Allows for personalized dashboard setups for unique insights.
Topology Maps: Visualizes network layout for easier management.
Device Monitoring: Ensures all network devices are operating efficiently.
Automation: Streamlines network operations with automated tasks.
Firewall Analyzer: Enhances security measures and performance monitoring.
NetFlow: Analyzes bandwidth usage and traffic patterns.
Application Manager: Monitors server and application performance.

What benefits should users expect from ManageEngine OpManager?

Improved Network Performance: Real-time insights enhance network efficiency.
Proactive Alerts: Early warnings help address issues before they escalate.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies management with comprehensive integration features.
Scalability: Supports growth with multi-location deployment capabilities.

ManageEngine OpManager is widely implemented in industries requiring robust network infrastructure management. Companies in sectors with complex server and application needs benefit from its monitoring and alerting capabilities. Its ability to manage and provide insights across distributed locations makes it a valuable tool for enterprises operating in both on-premise and cloud environments.

ManageEngine

NetMon offers significant capabilities in log aggregation, traffic analysis, and real-time network insights. Its ease of use accommodates both entry-level and advanced functionalities, enhancing network visibility and threat detection.

NetMon provides seamless analytics with its real-time dashboards and advanced AI integration. The platform is designed for comprehensive monitoring and detailed analysis, making it indispensable for identifying network traffic, origins, destinations, and facilitating threat detection through lateral traffic visibility. Despite its powerful analytics and customization features, improvements in product integration, customer support, and pricing could increase its competitive edge. Connectivity, topology visualization, and server performance are areas noted for enhancement. Integration with protocols like Gflow and Netflow might alleviate agent-based restriction challenges. NetMon sends correlated data to LogRhythm SIEM for enhanced threat analysis and is used for tasks like traffic analysis and DPA.

What are NetMon's key features?

Log Aggregation: Seamless collection of diverse network logs for analysis.
Traffic Analysis: Detailed inspection of network traffic for identifying irregular patterns.
AI Integration: Advanced analytics powered by robust AI capabilities.
Customizable Dashboards: Real-time insights tailored to user requirements.
Correlation Engine: In-depth correlation of network activity for comprehensive reports.
Deep Packet Analytics: Thorough examination of data packets for granular insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Significant improvements in identifying lateral threats.
Comprehensive Insights: Complete visibility into network and user activities.
Efficient Monitoring: Real-time analytics streamline network monitoring processes.
Compliance Support: Strong integration supports adherence to compliance standards.

NetMon is widely adopted in industries requiring detailed traffic monitoring and security, such as finance and healthcare. Its capabilities in traffic type identification and correlated analysis make it essential for environments where detecting irregular patterns is critical. It's utilized for network security through comprehensive analysis and integration with SIEM systems.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Sera-Brynn

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon

November 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. NetMon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.