No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared McAfee and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #2 in ATP , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 53 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 6,019 Views
  • 3,250 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Netgate and others in Firewalls.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Firewalls Report (Updated: October 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
October 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Firewall Enterprise ...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Network Detection a...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (2nd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer999975 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer999975
Computer Technician at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We cannot find resources to help us configure it, so most of the time the virus still goes on our computer and McAfee doesn't detect it
It's pretty easy to use on a daily basis, but there are no other features because it's hard to configure on the server. On the endpoint it's really easy to push. It's hard to configure on the server, though. It's hard to find resources to help us configure it, and there is not much online help that you can find. Most of the time, we were looking at the forums, and we needed to go very deep to find what we were looking for. It was hard, and McAfee was not really helpful when we were trying to get the product to work perfectly. This is why are changing it.
Read full review
Twinkle Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Twinkle Solanki
Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd
Continuous network insight has improved early threat detection and streamlined investigations
Overall, we have a positive experience with Trellix Network Detection and Response, but like any enterprise security solution, there are areas where it can continue to improve. One area would be user interface and dashboard customization. While the platform provides a lot of valuable information, new users can sometimes face a learning curve when navigating and investigating and creating customized views. More intuitive dashboards would simplify workflows and help analysts access critical information even faster. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. The existing reporting capabilities are useful, but more flexibility and customizable reporting options would make it easier to generate executive-level summaries, compliance reports, and operational metrics for different audiences.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For managing multiple MFE firewalls it is incredibly handy, convenient, and it is easy to use the product with McAfee Control Centre."
"It's a very functional and stable product if you're looking for a Layer 7 firewall with reputation filtering and encrypted traffic inspection."
"We have 10 offices throughout Brazil, and now they are all connected by using the VPN feature of the firewall."
"It does give certain protection for everything that is well configured on our McAfee server. We have good protection with it. If we could find a feature and make it work, it would work perfectly, there would be no bugs, and it would be really good."
"ROI: It's good."
"By every measure, the FireEye Network Threat Prevention Platform has exceeded our expectations."
"The installation phase was easy."
"The most valuable feature is the view into the application."
"FireEye has created an ecosystem of products integrated with their own SIEM, which is cloud-based and integrates with network security, email security, host security and the like."
"For our customers, it added a layer of inspection that might be missed by traditional IPS or antivirus products, and that is the capability of catching new malware that might not have been identified or seen in the wild before."
"The simplified Alert Dashboard is straightforward to navigate."
"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities."
"Overall, security operations are approximately 30 to 40 percent more efficient, and we can save time because everything automatically analyzes, resulting in approximately 40 to 50 percent time savings."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
 

Cons

"Customer support and AV are both lacking and are really hard to come to you when the product is installed. Those are the two major points that they need to work on."
"Administration of the firewall is a little confusing for end users."
"HA configuration is a bit difficult for the first time."
"Migrating from v7 to v8 of McAfee Firewall Enterprise, in many cases, involves you having to completely re-write all of your previous McAfee Firewall Enterprise v7 policies due to the difference in the way the interfaces are named in the product going from v7 to v8."
"The hardware is not stable and we have faced many stability issues."
"Technical support needs improvement as sometimes engineers are not available promptly, especially during high-severity incidents."
"The Trellix solution could be improved by enhancing the Central Management Console for faster visibility, which would help in network detection response."
"I would like to see in Trellix Network Detection and Response more explanation about some details of the threat, and I wish it had more actions that you can take to contain the host or move it somewhere else."
"Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier."
"On a scale of one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best, I would you rate this product an 8. From a security perspective, it's pretty decent. It's just that I have seen it miss some semi loads or triggers when it's integrated with other products."
"It is an expensive solution."
"Technical packaging could be improved."
"As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web)."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is a little high."
"The tool is a bit pricey."
"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."
"When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
21%
Construction Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is positive, as the setup process was straightforward, licensing was flexible, and the value deliver...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
Based on my experience with the solution, I do not see any improvements needed for Trellix Network Detection and Response at present; it might be required in the future, but there is no space to im...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?
Our main use case for Trellix Network Detection and Response is to maintain oversight of our network traffic and catch any threats or unusual activity as early as possible. Trellix Network Detectio...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 37% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
More McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Competitors
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 7% of the time
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 5% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 4% of the time
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
October 2026
McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] reportDownload McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Network Detection and Response
October 2026
Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

Firewall Enterprise MFE, Intel Security Firewall Enterprise MFE
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Overview

McAfee Firewall Enterprise defends critical assets, such as regulated data repositories (customer, financial, and healthcare data), email and web servers, extranets, and data centers. This proxy-based firewall also offers application visibility and deep application controls for defense, delivers strong policy-based controls, blocks the latest threats, and eliminates unwanted traffic.
McAfee

Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat protection with advanced detection of zero-day attacks and APTs. Its user-friendly dashboard and real-time response capabilities enhance security and visibility across networks.

Trellix Network Detection and Response stands out with its MVX engine, leveraging virtual machines for comprehensive behavioral analysis. The solution supports detection of advanced cyber threats through features like sandboxing and application filtering, offering real-time response and packet capture for detailed contextual insights. Companies benefit from seamless integration with other platforms, enhancing usability and overall protection. User-friendly interfaces improve network visibility, while stability and ease of configuration safeguard against both signature-based and signature-less threats.

What key features does Trellix offer?
  • Zero-Day Attacks Detection: Identifies and mitigates unknown threats.
  • APTs Detection: Detects advanced persistent threats through sophisticated techniques.
  • MVX Engine: Uses virtual machines for behavioral analysis.
  • Sandboxing: Adds a layer of threat protection.
  • Real-Time Response: Offers immediate threat mitigation and context.
  • User-Friendly Dashboard: Enhances visibility with application filtering.
What are the benefits of Trellix Network Detection and Response?
  • Enhanced Usability: Integrates easily with other platforms for seamless operations.
  • Detailed Context: Real-time packet capture provides in-depth threat analysis.
  • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Covers both signature-based and signature-less threats.
  • Improved Visibility: Offers clear dashboard analytics for network monitoring.

Companies in sectors like finance, healthcare, and enterprise security utilize Trellix Network Detection and Response for tasks such as network intrusion detection, endpoint protection, and securing data transmission paths. It aids in threat investigations, pre-sales demos, and network forensics, reducing risks by protecting against cyber threats like phishing.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

French Ministry of Education, RWTH Aachen, Avency, Cegedim, Cobweb, Intel Security, Cemex Mauser, R_sler Oberfl_chentechnik
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
October 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Netgate and others in Firewalls. Updated: October 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.