No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared McAfee and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Trellix is ranked #6 in ATP , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Trellix Network Detection a...
Read 53 Trellix Network Detection and Response reviews
  • 5,261 Views
  • 2,894 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Firewalls Report (Updated: September 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
September 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Firewall Enterprise ...
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Network Detection a...
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (6th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer999975 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer999975
Computer Technician at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We cannot find resources to help us configure it, so most of the time the virus still goes on our computer and McAfee doesn't detect it
It's pretty easy to use on a daily basis, but there are no other features because it's hard to configure on the server. On the endpoint it's really easy to push. It's hard to configure on the server, though. It's hard to find resources to help us configure it, and there is not much online help that you can find. Most of the time, we were looking at the forums, and we needed to go very deep to find what we were looking for. It was hard, and McAfee was not really helpful when we were trying to get the product to work perfectly. This is why are changing it.
Read full review
Twinkle Solanki - PeerSpot reviewer
Twinkle Solanki
Business development executive at Digitaltrack solution Pvt Ltd
Continuous network insight has improved early threat detection and streamlined investigations
Overall, we have a positive experience with Trellix Network Detection and Response, but like any enterprise security solution, there are areas where it can continue to improve. One area would be user interface and dashboard customization. While the platform provides a lot of valuable information, new users can sometimes face a learning curve when navigating and investigating and creating customized views. More intuitive dashboards would simplify workflows and help analysts access critical information even faster. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. The existing reporting capabilities are useful, but more flexibility and customizable reporting options would make it easier to generate executive-level summaries, compliance reports, and operational metrics for different audiences.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For managing multiple MFE firewalls it is incredibly handy, convenient, and it is easy to use the product with McAfee Control Centre."
"We have 10 offices throughout Brazil, and now they are all connected by using the VPN feature of the firewall."
"ROI: It's good."
"It does give certain protection for everything that is well configured on our McAfee server. We have good protection with it. If we could find a feature and make it work, it would work perfectly, there would be no bugs, and it would be really good."
"It's a very functional and stable product if you're looking for a Layer 7 firewall with reputation filtering and encrypted traffic inspection."
"The solution can scale."
"Trellix Network Detection and Response has positively impacted my organization by significantly reducing the time to detect as we also were experimenting with the automation systems."
"I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."
"Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security."
"It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"There are sandbox capabilities; you can submit malicious files and get great feedback, including if there is malware and what it is doing, and it can give you simulations in different operating systems and applications to provide real insights from the perspective of a real environment."
"Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pros
 

Cons

"Migrating from v7 to v8 of McAfee Firewall Enterprise, in many cases, involves you having to completely re-write all of your previous McAfee Firewall Enterprise v7 policies due to the difference in the way the interfaces are named in the product going from v7 to v8."
"Administration of the firewall is a little confusing for end users."
"HA configuration is a bit difficult for the first time."
"The hardware is not stable and we have faced many stability issues."
"Customer support and AV are both lacking and are really hard to come to you when the product is installed. Those are the two major points that they need to work on."
"A lot of false positives."
"It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."
"We'd like the potential for better scaling."
"FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically."
"Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone."
"If you want to search the hashes in the environment, you need to put in IOCs one by one, making it a very hectic job."
"To improve Trellix Network Detection and Response, I suggest enhancing reporting customization; the reports can be much better, and I should have the ability to customize them much more freely."
"There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
"Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
"Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."
"Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
"The pricing is fair, a little expensive, but fair. We've evaluated other products, and they're similarly priced."
"We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
"When you purchase FireEye Network Security NX, will need to purchase a megabit per second package. You must know your needs from day one."
More Trellix Network Detection and Response pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business35
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FireEye Network Security?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Trellix Network Detection and Response is positive, as the setup process was straightforward, licensing was flexible, and the value deliver...
See all answers
What needs improvement with FireEye Network Security?
Based on my experience with the solution, I do not see any improvements needed for Trellix Network Detection and Response at present; it might be required in the future, but there is no space to im...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for FireEye Network Security?
Our main use case for Trellix Network Detection and Response is to maintain oversight of our network traffic and catch any threats or unusual activity as early as possible. Trellix Network Detectio...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
SonicWall NSa vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 39% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 13% of the time
Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 11% of the time
Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Netgate pfSense vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL]
Compared 8% of the time
More McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] Competitors
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 6% of the time
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 5% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 4% of the time
Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Anomali vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Trellix Network Detection and Response
Compared 3% of the time
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
September 2026
McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] reportDownload McAfee Firewall Enterprise MFE [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Network Detection and Response
August 2026
Trellix Network Detection and Response reportDownload Trellix Network Detection and Response product report
 

Also Known As

Firewall Enterprise MFE, Intel Security Firewall Enterprise MFE
FireEye Network Security, FireEye
 

Overview

McAfee Firewall Enterprise defends critical assets, such as regulated data repositories (customer, financial, and healthcare data), email and web servers, extranets, and data centers. This proxy-based firewall also offers application visibility and deep application controls for defense, delivers strong policy-based controls, blocks the latest threats, and eliminates unwanted traffic.
McAfee

Trellix Network Detection and Response provides robust threat protection with advanced detection of zero-day attacks and APTs. Its user-friendly dashboard and real-time response capabilities enhance security and visibility across networks.

Trellix Network Detection and Response stands out with its MVX engine, leveraging virtual machines for comprehensive behavioral analysis. The solution supports detection of advanced cyber threats through features like sandboxing and application filtering, offering real-time response and packet capture for detailed contextual insights. Companies benefit from seamless integration with other platforms, enhancing usability and overall protection. User-friendly interfaces improve network visibility, while stability and ease of configuration safeguard against both signature-based and signature-less threats.

What key features does Trellix offer?
  • Zero-Day Attacks Detection: Identifies and mitigates unknown threats.
  • APTs Detection: Detects advanced persistent threats through sophisticated techniques.
  • MVX Engine: Uses virtual machines for behavioral analysis.
  • Sandboxing: Adds a layer of threat protection.
  • Real-Time Response: Offers immediate threat mitigation and context.
  • User-Friendly Dashboard: Enhances visibility with application filtering.
What are the benefits of Trellix Network Detection and Response?
  • Enhanced Usability: Integrates easily with other platforms for seamless operations.
  • Detailed Context: Real-time packet capture provides in-depth threat analysis.
  • Comprehensive Threat Protection: Covers both signature-based and signature-less threats.
  • Improved Visibility: Offers clear dashboard analytics for network monitoring.

Companies in sectors like finance, healthcare, and enterprise security utilize Trellix Network Detection and Response for tasks such as network intrusion detection, endpoint protection, and securing data transmission paths. It aids in threat investigations, pre-sales demos, and network forensics, reducing risks by protecting against cyber threats like phishing.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

French Ministry of Education, RWTH Aachen, Avency, Cegedim, Cobweb, Intel Security, Cemex Mauser, R_sler Oberfl_chentechnik
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Buyer's Guide
Firewalls
September 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls. Updated: September 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.