Microsoft Azure App Service vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 2.5% mindshare in RADS, compared to Oracle’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure App Service

Read 50 Microsoft Azure App Service reviews

2,820 Views
2,566 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

1,416 Views
892 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure App Service

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and Microsoft Azure App Service compete in the domain of cloud application development and deployment. Microsoft Azure App Service appears to have the upper hand due to its broader feature set and flexibility, while Oracle provides competitive pricing and strong integration with its ecosystem.

Features: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers a no-code interface, swift app creation within Oracle Cloud, and integration with Oracle's ecosystem. Microsoft Azure App Service supports multiple programming languages, a wide range of integrated development tools, and superior scalability options.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Visual Builder could improve in custom solution support, language support variety, and documentation comprehensiveness. Microsoft Azure App Service could enhance its ease of use for non-Microsoft ecosystems, integration complexity, and initial cost transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure App Service provides a streamlined deployment process, robust customer service, and comprehensive documentation, facilitating continuous deployment integrations. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers seamless Oracle ecosystem integration but may require more support for custom solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers competitive pricing for Oracle Cloud users with a focus on rapid development, yielding quicker ROI in Oracle-dependent scenarios. Microsoft Azure App Service may demand a higher initial investment but can deliver a higher ROI through its flexible and scalable model, catering to diverse deployment scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure App Service

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (4th)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 2.5%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure App Service	2.5%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.5%
Other	96.0%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

AntonioNascimento

Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamless integration and application hosting enabled through versatile service

When using a Linux App Service or containerized App Services, the logging is not as good as when using the Windows version. The Linux App Service should be more user-friendly, focusing on logging, troubleshooting, and similar features. With Microsoft Azure App Service, it is more difficult with Linux or other container solutions because there are many options. When creating an App Service, you can create it as Linux or Windows. After that, you can choose some stack or use Docker to container. When using Linux with container, the logging functionality is not as robust.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is fast, and creating a new component and starting is easy."

"The most valuable feature is that it's an ideal solution when it comes to lifting and shifting monolithic applications from on-premises to Azure Cloud. It allows for a quick shift into the cloud without having to analyze and design very specific infrastructure and services for monolithic applications hosted primarily on-premises. Let's say that the team does not want to really redesign monoliths in a microservices-based application and that they want to make a quick move towards adopting the cloud tech stack. Then, Microsoft Azure App Service is probably the best option."

"Azure App Service has several features that are valuable, including its scalability and seamless integration with other systems, which support flexibility."

"I would rate the product ten out of ten."

"One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process."

"It is the best because it's easy to use, and there's a plan for every type of workload."

"Microsoft Azure App Service is an easy way to host applications and web applications, and it is very straightforward to automate the deploying and configure, making it very easy and useful."

"The product is easy to maintain and deploy."

More Microsoft Azure App Service pros

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The tool is very easy to use."

Cons

"When using a Linux App Service or containerized App Services, the logging is not as good as when using the Windows version."

"I would like to see some improvement in the UI/UX design, to make navigation of this solution more user friendly. For example, it could contain more explicit information on each of the features."

"The pricing is average. It could be lower."

"App Service sometimes becomes very slow to respond, and it can be difficult to find the issue causing this."

"Sometimes we face problems, but those are technical problems in Microsoft, bugs or something doesn't work as expected, but that's normal."

"Documentation is not well-organized, making it difficult to find current and relevant information."

"Extended uptime and improved speed would be beneficial for both development purposes and the free tier of the service. Currently, the uptime is limited to a few hours per day, which could be increased to provide more continuous and efficient usage."

"I am new to the intervention and I find it difficult to find my way around the user interface. I have my own learning tool. However, it could be simpler for new users."

More Microsoft Azure App Service cons

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate this solution as a four."

"The product's price is low, especially if we compare it with other tools or clouds, like Google Cloud or AWS Cloud."

"The cost depends on the App Service plan that you choose. There are a number of tiers available."

"I rate Microsoft Azure App Service a seven out of ten for pricing."

"The pricing for Microsoft Azure App Service is per hour, and you're billed per hour, and it depends on the plan you're using. Each plan can host up to a minimum of four to eight applications at a time, so the pricing is quite okay with how I use Microsoft Azure App Service currently, but with the little testing I've done, I saw that some other regions tend to be costlier than others. If the same SLE is delivered for all services, there should be a way to make the prices parallel across regions. Having more transparent pricing for Microsoft Azure App Service would give customers more comfort."

"The price of the support could improve. It is expensive."

"Microsoft Azure App Service is an expensive platform, but it depends on the data ingestion. There's a pay-as-you-go plan and a savings plan for compute, but total costs depend on data ingestion and disk space. For high performance, security, and isolation, Microsoft offers a disk space of 1 TB, with a pay-as-you-go price of $40 per hour, if I'm not mistaken."

More Microsoft Azure App Service pricing and cost advice

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

University

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?

Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...

See all answers

Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?

I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure App Service?

One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 23% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 7% of the time

OutSystems vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure App Service Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure App Service

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure App Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

January 2026

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure App Service is an HTTP-based mobile application development platform and solution. It is designed to enable organizations to completely control their application development and hosting processes.

Microsoft Azure App Service Benefits

Some of the benefits that come from using Microsoft Azure App Service include:

A high level of security. Microsoft Azure App Service comes with enterprise-level and industry-standard SLAs through the use of PCI security standards. Users can go about developing their applications without having to worry about exposure to security risks. Microsoft Azure App Service keeps the application development process secure so that all that users have to worry about is creating their application.

Collaborate and develop applications from anywhere. Teams that are spread out across the globe can collaborate and build applications from anywhere that they happen to be. Microsoft’s global data center is a cloud hub that developers can take advantage of to connect their teams if they are located in disparate locations. It can handle all of a developer's application hosting needs.

Multi-format and multi-lingual support. Microsoft Azure App Service supports both physical machine and virtual machine formats. In addition, it also supports a variety of different programming languages.

Utilize pre-fabricated templates. Microsoft Azure App Service gives developers access to an extensive list of templates. These can both ease the process of planning the development of applications by providing developers with ideas and make it easier for the developers to build them.

Microsoft Azure App Service Features

Some of the many useful features Microsoft Azure App Service has to offer include:

When users choose to employ the Microsoft Azure App Service solution, they gain access to many different capabilities. These features include:

Manual or automatic auto-scaling capabilities. Microsoft Azure App Service enables developers to control how their applications auto-scale. Developers can employ the auto-scaling feature by hand or set it so that it automatically rescales according to their needs.

IDE integrations. Microsoft Azure App Service can easily integrate with various IDE software solutions. This gives developers access to many analytic, debugging, and monitoring options.

Deployment slots. These are virtual spaces where developers can test and deploy new versions of their applications while working on them. This feature allows developers to resolve any issues before the new version of the application is put into production.

Reviews from Real Users

Microsoft Azure App Service’s versatility offers organizations that use it a great deal. It is a very complete, ready-to-use, out-of-the-box mobile development solution that gives users the capabilities that they need to design their mobile applications with the greatest level of ease. In addition, users can employ the cloud to scale operations so that their applications have the proper amount of space to run at the time that they need it.

Andriy L., the Azure practice leader at a computer software company, writes, “I like that it's a ready-to-use, out-of-the-box solution that provides all of the necessary functions for customers, such as codes that can be quickly switched from the production version, or test and DEV versions to production.”

Yasir M., a solution architect at Komatsu, writes, "The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."

Microsoft

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

February 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.