Microsoft Azure App Service vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure App Service

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (4th)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 2.1%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure App Service	2.1%
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service	1.6%
Other	96.3%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

AntonioNascimento

Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Seamless integration and application hosting enabled through versatile service

When using a Linux App Service or containerized App Services, the logging is not as good as when using the Windows version. The Linux App Service should be more user-friendly, focusing on logging, troubleshooting, and similar features. With Microsoft Azure App Service, it is more difficult with Linux or other container solutions because there are many options. When creating an App Service, you can create it as Linux or Windows. After that, you can choose some stack or use Docker to container. When using Linux with container, the logging functionality is not as robust.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head Of Digital Solutions at Aptec Ingrammicro

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it's an ideal solution when it comes to lifting and shifting monolithic applications from on-premises to Azure Cloud. It allows for a quick shift into the cloud without having to analyze and design very specific infrastructure and services for monolithic applications hosted primarily on-premises. Let's say that the team does not want to really redesign monoliths in a microservices-based application and that they want to make a quick move towards adopting the cloud tech stack. Then, Microsoft Azure App Service is probably the best option."

"My advice to anyone looking to use Microsoft Azure App Service is that you should try it and see the power of getting your applications out at a faster rate."

"I like that it's a ready-to-use, out-of-the-box solution that provides all of the necessary functions for customers, such as codes that can be quickly switched from the production version, or from test and DEV versions to production."

"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure App Service is that it's a PaaS. I also like that it supports Docker and multiple frameworks so that you can work on Java, Ruby on Rails, PHP, and Python."

"The most beneficial aspect of Microsoft Azure App Service is its automated DevOps deployment, which includes configurations that ensure secure connections to key vault and database resources."

"The primary and standout feature is ease of deployment."

"Azure data factory is a good tool."

"Enroll in some kind of formal training, not from Microsoft, but from a partner, and keep up with the change because the Azure platform changes a lot."

More Microsoft Azure App Service pros

"The initial setup is easy."

"You can avoid costly React developers that are required for building advanced UI."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The tool is very easy to use."

Cons

"The cost management of this solution could be better. We only receive estimations."

"If you are not using the product properly, then it can cost you a lot of money. Hence, you need to make sure that you choose the services wisely. You need to make sure that you have a budget and have some alerts associated with it. The tool's cost can easily go high if you don't consider these things properly. You need to review your existing subscription."

"There are no issues with the solution."

"Microsoft Azure App Service needs some improvement in the scaling area."

"From an IoT use case perspective, we're all good, however, we should have additional plugins."

"There is still room for improvement in terms of the maturity of the solution. Everything is available that we need, but the issue is that they are still upgrading. Even though they have Azure applications and automation services, they still need to mature more. There are many things that need to mature and the road map for this is quite long, taking another three to eight years to have a mature solution."

"It would be fantastic if Microsoft morphed after my exit service, removing it from subscriptions and moving it to different regions, especially for that service."

"The pricing is average. It could be lower."

More Microsoft Azure App Service cons

"The tool has minor bugs."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"If you're doing some, for example, extremely responsive applications for the web, it's not as good."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"My honest opinion is: do not use this solution — there are plenty of free options out there that will do the trick."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Less than USD $100 per month."

"On a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being competitive, I would rate this solution as a four."

"Azure doesn't cost as much as other services."

"The cost depends on the App Service plan that you choose. There are a number of tiers available."

"Azure App Service is expensive compared to its competitors, especially its cloud-only version."

"Where there are different customer sizes, some customers consume $5,000 US dollars per month. I have some customers who pay and consume more than $20,000 US dollars per month, for example. It is determined by customer sizes and requirements, which vary from month to month."

"The price of the support could improve. It is expensive."

"We have no complaints about the pricing."

More Microsoft Azure App Service pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?

Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...

Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?

I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure App Service?

You can start with a basic plan, which costs very little. As your necessity and workload increase, you can scale up and add many nodes. If you need to host three, four, or five nodes with high avai...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

VBCS is very flexible. If there is a custom solution or requirement that requires doing something out of the box with Oracle Fusion, you can easily achieve it using VBCS. I'd rate the solution eigh...

Microsoft Power Apps vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Comparisons

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare Workers vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 5% of the time

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure App Service

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure App Service Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 9% of the time

MATS vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

Studio Creatio vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 6% of the time

Comidor vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure App Service

Download Microsoft Azure App Service product report

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Also Known As

Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure App Service offers a comprehensive platform for hosting applications, providing ease of deployment, scalability, and integration capabilities. Its support for diverse frameworks and robust tools makes it ideal for developing and deploying enterprise applications efficiently.

Azure App Service is designed to simplify the process of creating, deploying, and scaling applications in the cloud. It supports automatic scaling, resource management, and integration with Azure DevOps and other Microsoft services. Users benefit from serverless options, built-in security, and low latency. The platform supports frameworks such as .NET, Java, Ruby, PHP, and Python, providing robust customization, monitoring, and diagnostic tools. However, users have noted areas for improvement such as ease of use, pricing transparency, and deployment across different environments. Enhancements in scalability, logging, troubleshooting for Linux-based services, and smoother integration are needed. Technical support and regional availability should also be developed.

What features make Azure App Service stand out?

Automatic Scaling: Seamlessly adjusts resources based on demand.
Integration: Connects with Azure DevOps and other Microsoft services.
Serverless Options: Provides flexibility without managing infrastructure.
Security: Offers built-in security features to protect applications.
Framework Support: Accommodates .NET, Java, Ruby, PHP, and Python.

What benefits and ROI does Azure App Service provide?

Ease of Deployment: Simplifies the development and release process.
Scalability: Grows with application needs effortlessly.
Flexibility: Integrates with existing systems and tools.
Efficiency: Reduces reliance on dedicated DevOps resources.
Infrastructure Management: Minimizes overhead with serverless architecture.

Azure App Service is frequently used in industries requiring agile development and robust infrastructure, such as DevOps, ETL, and ecommerce. Companies rely on it for hosting web, API, and mobile apps, appreciating its efficient handling of microservices and proof of concepts. Its integration capabilities and customizable options make it appealing for organizations focusing on comprehensive application solutions.

Microsoft

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service delivers a low-code environment featuring drag-and-drop capabilities for seamless development without vendor locks, ensuring scalability and versatility.

Offering drag-and-drop functionality and a low-code environment, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service supports both beginners and experienced developers by integrating JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, enhanced with Oracle JET packages. This service facilitates browser-based development and easy integration with existing systems. However, improvement is needed in its licensing structure, functionality for less experienced developers, and native mobile development support. Performance can be affected by minor bugs, especially with complex tasks.

What are the key features?

Drag-and-Drop Builder: Simplifies UI/UX development with intuitive design tools.
Low-Code Environment: Accelerates application development with minimal coding.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for complex scenarios.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with robust architecture.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed resources for assistance and learning.
Action Chains & Trigger Events: Enhances application interactivity and functionality.

What should users consider for ROI?

Development Speed: Reduces time to market with efficient design tools.
Cost Effectiveness: Offers long-term savings compared to custom coding solutions.
Flexibility: Supports diverse business applications from case management to AI invoices.
System Integration: Works seamlessly with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP.

Businesses leverage Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service in industries like legal, healthcare, and enterprise resource planning. It aids in developing software for case management, creating worklists for medical companies, and extending Oracle SaaS applications. Companies also benefit from its capability to build custom forms and streamline business processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service