Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Uplynk comparison

Microsoft and Uplynk are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6, while Uplynk is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 6.0% mindshare in WAF, compared to Uplynk’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Application...

Read 50 Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

6,806 Views
5,445 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

1,798 Views
647 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Application...

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Uplynk and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are competing products designed for media delivery optimization and application traffic management, respectively. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has an advantage due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Uplynk is designed for effective media delivery, offering adaptive bitrate streaming and straightforward workflow integration. In contrast, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides robust security features, including a Web Application Firewall (WAF), advanced traffic routing capabilities, and tools for optimizing application performance, which are crucial for enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could improve by enhancing its security features and expanding application management capabilities. Additionally, its media delivery can be optimized for larger-scale deployments. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could streamline its deployment process and offer simpler configuration management for users with less technical expertise. The pricing structure could also be more flexible to attract smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Uplynk's deployment process is straightforward, with a strong emphasis on rapid media delivery and responsive support, making it ideal for broadcast and streaming. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, despite a more complex deployment due to its broader capabilities, is supported by comprehensive documentation and customer support that assists in managing application traffic.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk's pricing is accessible, providing a quick return on investment through its efficient media delivery setup. Although Microsoft Azure Application Gateway may have higher initial costs, its extensive security and performance features justify the investment, leading to a significant long-term return on investment despite the potential higher expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Uplynk

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Application...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (4th)

Uplynk

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (9th), CDN (9th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is 6.0%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway	6.0%
Uplynk	1.3%
Other	92.7%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

reviewer5599486

Cloud Specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Mutual TLS has secured our web services and now needs broader protocol support

The most valuable feature we have found in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is mutual TLS. We find mutual TLS valuable because we can verify the client securely by setting up the trust certificate of the client, and also if we do it at the client side as well. This successfully develops mutual trust, ensuring that we know the client who is calling our service is a legitimate client. That is a very nice feature.Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has helped manage our traffic efficiently because we have many web services that we can put behind the same URL, and we can have different URLs with the same Application Gateway with a limited number of listeners. We can do host-based routing as well as URL-based routing or path-based routing. It supports both, so we can have even a single URL supporting many applications, or we can have different URLs for different applications respectively. We have both use cases.

Read full review

Joe Hernandez

Senior Software Engineer at OmniTier Inc

Improved mobile app development and user experience through optimization and security

The most valuable aspects include the optimization of application performance by optimizing API calls for a smoother user experience and faster load times. Furthermore, I restructured our code base to establish a more efficient development workflow. During my tenure, I integrated various security features for mobile applications, such as JWT tokens for secure authentication and data encryption using AES algorithms. I also focused on secure storage options, secure coding practices, and platform-specific security compliance, like Android's SafeNet and iOS Secure Enclave.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure."

"I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily."

"Azure Application Gateway's most valuable feature is ease of use. The configuration is straightforward. It isn't difficult to adjust the size of your instances in the settings. You can do that with a few clicks, and the configuration file is the same way. You can also set rules and policies with minimal time and effort."

"The pricing is quite good."

"Some of the key features of this solution are the low-level maintenance required, floating proxy service, and load balancing."

"Using policies to link and manage these URL-based routing configurations is also valuable."

"The solution's integration is very good."

"The tool is easy to use and quite flexible. It has policy management features as well. The solution screens all traffic to our web applications before passing it to the application. We recently tested it on one of our poorly developed applications, and the upgrade gave us a 100% result based on our tests. It's very effective as a security measure, and people can detect threats even through the web application."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

Cons

"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."

"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."

"The support provided for the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement, especially when it comes to the response time from the support team."

"I believe that there is room for improvement in terms of additional functionality. It is an advantage to have features readily available for configuration without needing customer-defined rules."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has room for improvement because it offers many features, but its configuration is a bit difficult, at least from the developer point of view."

"The solution can sometimes feel a little cumbersome unless you're a professional infrastructure person."

"It does not have the flexibility for using public IPs in version 2."

"The solution could improve by increasing the performance when doing updates. For example, if I change the certificate it can take 30 minutes. Other vendors do not have this type of problem."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway cons

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is some additional cost, such as extended support."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a pretty affordable product. My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. The additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution vary."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has less price than other application gateway solutions."

"The solution is reasonably priced compared to other solutions."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."

"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."

"The product is not expensive."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is expensive."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing and cost advice

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 8% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 6% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

January 2026

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

January 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Uplynk

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.