No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Object Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
17th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (24th), Cloud Storage (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is 3.3%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 3.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Object Storage3.3%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud3.8%
Other92.9%
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Pradeep Saxena - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Officer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Cloud storage has improved HR document management, performance, and secure archival
Microsoft Azure Object Storage improves the application performance and reliability, enabling faster processing for critical business workloads. It also reduces the cost and operational overhead with scalable, secure, and easy to manage cloud storage. Switching from public storage to Microsoft Azure Object Storage resulted in cost savings and enhanced security. This application is used on a day-to-day basis, making it useful while providing significant cost savings. In addition, it is secure. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is stable. The scalability of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that it provides a scalable solution.
CC
Co-Founder at Atsign
Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time
NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is flexible and has all the features we need."
"The installation of the product is quite easy, because automation is already in place, allowing easy deployment and integration with any file server and the requirements involved."
"Microsoft products are much more industrial strength and enterprise-ready than any other services out there."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"For security solutions in Microsoft Azure, I particularly appreciate Microsoft Azure AI foundation."
"What I have found most valuable about Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that I can store structured and non-structured files; apart from that, I can store storage and static contents, and if I want to share this with some external vendors, I can share that."
"The most valuable feature is the cost value, which is very important for long term retention, and we can keep the backups for a longer duration."
"It is a good service for high availability that is very easy to configure."
"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."
"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero."
"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."
"Overall, they have very impressive technologies."
"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."
 

Cons

"Since the solution is messy and heavy, it needs to be faster in terms of speed and latency."
"In future releases, I would add something like a better lifecycle management system, and for integration purposes, I would add some stuff related to newer concepts like data products and databases. I would like to have a seamless flow between those things."
"The efficiency depends on various operations, and therefore, it should involve multiple vendor support."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs to improve stability and cloud user interface."
"Object Storage's integration with other backup software could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve the custom domain integration with static web pages."
"The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."
"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."
"The user interface has room for improvement."
"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not aware of the licensing cost, as my customer handles it. In Taiwan, it's reasonably priced."
"The tool's licensing costs are annual. It should be made reasonable."
"The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."
"The pricing is competitive."
"The pricing can be improved. There is an yearly licensing cost for the solution. There are some reserve instances that are additional to the licensing cost."
"For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
"Encryption feature is an add-on."
"The pricing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is high and needs some reduction. It's a seven out of ten, price-wise, because it currently limits your consumption, so the solution should have better pricing."
"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Marketing Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
10%
Construction Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise22
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is very good.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
The customer support for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is not good. If a good engineer is assigned, then it functions well. However, every time we are doing troubleshooting, it is not Microsoft.
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Object Storage?
I have used Microsoft Azure Object Storage, which is a blob storage service. Our customers use the services that we provide for blob storage. Our customers use applications, and Microsoft Azure Obj...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.