Microsoft Azure VMware vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while Red Hat is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 3.7% mindshare in HCCP, compared to Red Hat’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure VMware

Read 4 Microsoft Azure VMware reviews

781 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 75 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

15,905 Views
1,431 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure VMware

Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Red Hat OpenShift and Microsoft Azure VMware are competing in the cloud infrastructure space, offering container and virtualization solutions. Red Hat OpenShift has an advantage in pricing and support, whereas Microsoft Azure VMware excels in features due to its comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Red Hat OpenShift provides a robust Kubernetes-based platform with extensive tools for container orchestration, management, and development, adaptable across hybrid cloud environments. Microsoft Azure VMware delivers seamless compatibility with VMware infrastructures, a strong suite of virtualization tools, and integration with Azure's ecosystem, efficiently extending legacy workloads to the cloud.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift simplifies application development with a container-focused deployment model and unified management interface, supporting diverse cloud infrastructures for flexibility. Microsoft Azure VMware offers a familiar virtualization environment, easing the transition to cloud services with native Azure integration and featuring responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Red Hat OpenShift has a scalable pricing structure suitable for varying enterprise needs, offering cost-effectiveness and favorable ROI. Microsoft Azure VMware involves higher initial setup costs but provides substantial ROI through operational efficiency and comprehensive virtualization support, justified for businesses seeking expansive virtualization solutions with Azure services integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure VMware

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (4th), Container Management (5th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure VMware is 3.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 8.5%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat OpenShift	8.5%
Microsoft Azure VMware	3.7%
Other	87.8%

Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms

Featured Reviews

DhammikaWeerakoon

Solutions Area Lead at Tech One Global

Cloud migration has reduced hardware dependence and optimizes security and AI-ready operations

Microsoft Azure VMware is an area that requires attention. I believe the VMware part should eventually merge with Azure as a single Azure platform, moving away from hypervisor-on-hypervisor architecture and instead bringing VMware features into Azure as native capabilities or as VMware-labeled features running in a true cloud environment. Some features should be brought in to achieve this integration. Additional improvements for Microsoft Azure VMware would include integration with Azure Site Recovery and disaster recovery capabilities. The ideal scenario would be VMware as primary with disaster recovery in Azure, connecting in a native manner. These improvements should be delivered as an integrated solution available out of the box rather than as separate components. Integration with other solutions such as Microsoft Site Recovery should encompass Azure native business continuity and disaster recovery with VMware. Microsoft Azure VMware would serve as primary hosting and connect natively to business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities with Azure. This should be available as a native feature.

Read full review

Ayman Abuqutriyah

Operation Director at Zaintech

Platform has transformed our cloud into a secure, unified home for diverse modern applications

One of the best features of Red Hat OpenShift is that it has the catalog, the application catalog, and the operator hub, which allows us to deploy things easily and straightforward without going into a lot of hassles. This is one of the main things, in addition to having integration with ACM and ACS, where we can have the ability to manage multiple clusters and to secure them, deploy them, manage them, run GitOps and day-two operations, as well as upgrades and other functionality which is made easy using these tools. Red Hat OpenShift also provides virtualization capabilities, and I am currently working with Zain to make a project where we will convert F5 appliances to virtual machines and to manage them through Red Hat virtualization, OVE. Red Hat OpenShift is a unique platform because it provides the features for both worlds, containerization, and VMs at the same time, requiring you to learn one skillset in order to manage all of this at the same time. In the beginning, our cloud depended only on virtual machines, so I introduced this to our management to start to work with microservices and with containerization. This was adapted in our cloud, providing us the capability to sell more of these features and to reduce the hardware requirement by about thirty percent, following the trends of using containerization for all modern applications. In addition, it reduced the time to develop and to deploy a new application; all we need is using Jenkins for CI/CD. Once we commit any code, it gets triggered, and it will implement the new container in a very flexible and easy way, within seconds. This decreased the time to market and increased agility, allowing us to capture new opportunities very fast.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Regarding stability, it is like a five-star solution."

"The capabilities are like a lift-and-shift operation for moving existing VMware environments to the cloud. The time for migration onto the cloud has substantially reduced."

"For new users, if you have a scalable environment where a VMware data center makes sense for your business, I definitely recommend AVS."

"Since organizations are already on VMware, they can lift and shift everything to Microsoft Azure VMware, allowing the data center to be moved as a whole rather than as separate servers."

"The integration is very good."

"It is a stable platform."

"I have seen a return on investment, and it depends upon the types and the nature of some of the most critical applications that have been hosted on the OpenShift infrastructure."

"Red Hat OpenShift has proven to be an intelligent product for me, being built on Kubernetes, which is widely recognized and is where many cloud providers are deploying new workloads."

"The concept of containers and scaling on demand is a feature I appreciate the most about Red Hat OpenShift."

"Valuable features include auto-recreate of pod if pod fails; fast rollback, with one click, to previous version."

"In terms of implementation, OpenShift is very user-friendly, which is an advantage. We are using it along with GitLab for implementing CI/CD pipelines. That's a feature that other products also have, but in OpenShift, we find it good."

"OpenShift has 100% compatibility with Kubernetes."

"The solution is easy to scale."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"Well, sometimes they release product after product, so it's it's kind of hard to keep an overview of all the different aspects of of the solutions."

"The only issue is that a small challenge was found regarding the network...to have extended, smooth VLANs and everything else was a little bit complicated."

"Azure VMware needs to cater to smaller enterprises, as it is currently meant for larger entities. One improvement could be more support for mid-sized or scalable environments."

"Microsoft Azure VMware is an area that requires attention."

"One of the improvements for Red Hat OpenShift which I have problems with is that the changes from version to version could be better."

"The main drawback was the upgrade from Openshift Enterprise 3.11 to Openshift Enterprise 4 up to now."

"OpenShift could improve by providing the ability to integrate with public cloud platforms. This way we can easily use the services that these platforms offer. For instance, Amazon AWS. However, all the three major hyper-scalers solutions offer excellent DevOps and CI/CD tooling. If there was an easy way to integrate with them it would be beneficial. We need a way to easily integrate with the monitoring and dashboard services that they provide."

"I want easier node management and more user-friendly scripts for installing master and worker nodes."

"The speed of deploying new applications can be improved."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"Red Hat OpenShift is very expensive."

"Areas where Red Hat OpenShift can be improved include the licensing being a bit complex and maybe expensive, as that is something in the hands of the organization's higher management, especially when those licensing agreements are done, and I think Red Hat OpenShift is quite resource-heavy because the control plane and default monitoring stack consume significant resources, meaning for small clusters, a large percentage of compute goes just to running Red Hat OpenShift itself, not our apps."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very competitive."

"The mandatory requirements, such as a minimum of three nodes, make it expensive. The customers need to sign up for approximately $20,000 per month."

"To be honest, the tool comes at a high price."

"My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift."

"We had a Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) license for all our servers' operating systems. By having multiple Red Hat products together, you can negotiate costs and leverage on having a sort of enterprise license agreement to reduce the overall outlay or TCO."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."

"It's important to start small because the solution is scalable. We can build our cluster and look at the bundle option, not the external subscriptions. Talking to the people at Red Hat can save us money."

"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"Pricing of OpenShift depends on the number of nodes and who is hosting it."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

17%

Government

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure VMware?

The pricing is high, rated around nine to 9.5 out of ten. The mandatory requirements, such as a minimum of three nodes, make it expensive. The customers need to sign up for approximately $20,000 pe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure VMware?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure VMware?

People are moving to Microsoft Azure VMware primarily due to reducing on-premises hardware dependencies. One key factor is VMware licensing, and another is hardware costs. Hardware prices are incre...

See all answers

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenShift?

I hope that the interface and dashboard can become more user-friendly to assist in creating clusters and managing network interfaces easily, as opposed to relying heavily on command lines, which co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 27% of the time

VMware Cloud on AWS vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 25% of the time

Azure Stack vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 23% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Microsoft Azure VMware

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure VMware Competitors

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 4% of the time

Hyper-V vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware

June 2026

Download Microsoft Azure VMware product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

June 2026

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

Microsoft Azure VMware provides a seamless integration of VMware environments into Azure, offering enterprises an efficient way to extend workloads and optimize their IT infrastructure. This facilitates a native VMware experience within Azure, ideal for scaling and modernizing services.

Azure VMware enables businesses to leverage existing investments in VMware tools and skills while taking advantage of Azure's scalability and global reach. Users find it valuable for disaster recovery, datacenter extension, and application modernization. It supports consistent operations and reduces complexity by simplifying operations and cutting IT costs. Additionally, users appreciate its ability to integrate with other Azure services for increased functionality and performance.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure VMware?

Hybrid Platform: Integrates on-premise VMware tools with Azure for consistent management.
Scalability: Easily scale VMware-based applications leveraging Azure's infrastructure.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust solutions for backup and recovery scenarios, ensuring business continuity.
Flexibility: Supports various VMware workloads, optimizing performance and costs.

What benefits should you evaluate in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Potential for reduced IT expenses by utilizing cloud resources for scaling.
Time Savings: Streamlines operations time with easy management and deployment.
Seamless Integration: Preserves existing investment in VMware tools and skills.
Enhanced Security: Utilizes Azure's comprehensive security features to protect workloads.

In industries like healthcare and finance, Microsoft Azure VMware is implemented to enhance datacenter capacities and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Its ability to integrate with existing resources allows companies to transition workloads without significant disruption, providing a flexible and scalable solution that supports innovation while maintaining operational continuity.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift is a comprehensive platform offering versatile container orchestration capabilities, suitable for businesses seeking robust, scalable, and secure solutions for application modernization efforts and microservices deployment.

Red Hat OpenShift combines a user-friendly interface with powerful CLI tools, ensuring rapid deployment and process automation. It seamlessly integrates with Docker and Kubernetes, providing cloud-native stacks for flexibility and compliance. Enhancing development efficiency, OpenShift includes built-in CI/CD tools and dynamic scaling features. It supports multi-cloud environments, avoiding vendor lock-in. However, documentation gaps, interface complexity, and infrastructure demands present challenges, alongside improving integration with third-party tools and monitoring capabilities. Licensing complexities and resource consumption remain areas for improvement, with user experience varying due to support response times.

What are Red Hat OpenShift's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Offers an intuitive interface for managing containers and applications.
CLI Tools: Robust command line tools for efficient development workflows.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands.
Integration: Seamless integration with Docker and Kubernetes.
Security: Features like role-based access control enhance security.
CI/CD Tools: Built-in tools like Jenkins streamline the development lifecycle.
Multi-Cloud Support: Enables use across different cloud providers.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Deployment Speed: Faster application rollouts and updates.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.
Security: High-security standards for protecting applications.
Adaptability: Flexible framework suited for diverse environments.
Resource Management: Efficient allocation of resources for cost savings.

In industries embracing cloud-native architectures, Red Hat OpenShift is adept for hosting containerized applications and transitioning legacy systems. It excels in managing DevOps processes, supporting production and development in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology, ensuring robust hybrid on-premise and cloud operations.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift

June 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure VMware vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.