Microsoft Power Automate vs OpenText Robotic Process Automation comparison

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Power Automate are the ease of use and the templates that are provided. I no longer need to make the document from scratch. I can search for what template I want and then it only requires me to modify it a bit for my needs. Additionally, it's helped improve my productivity and efficiency, and at the same time, it's quicker."

"The solution integrates more easily and with more tools than Automation Anywhere."

"The program requires no code making it very easy to implement various functions."

"Microsoft Power Automate's no-code workflows help my team in daily operations to a great extent."

"It helps with the feedback mechanism, where we need to determine the relevant team and obtain their email addresses."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Power Automate are user-friendliness and low coding functionality."

"From my personal experience of using Microsoft Power Automate, I think that the automatic document processing feature is helpful for many organizations in streamlining administrative processes. It is a very good feature. It has helped many enterprises to process documents without spending much time on them."

"Power Automate is not complex and is very easy-to-use in deploying most development projects."

"It lets us automate almost anything, even with the legacy tools. It is very easy for us now to automate with legacy tools, which used to be difficult earlier. We work with a lot of other automation tools from Micro Focus, such as Operation Orchestration, but these tools can only connect to the API. So, there was a gap when we wanted to automate older and legacy tools that didn't have any API to connect to. We can now also automate without any changes in the customer environment. We don't need to change anything in the way that the customer environment works."

"The debugging tools require improvement as well as the monitoring which goes along with it."

"Microsoft Power Automate's basic activities are not strong."

"It can have customizations like enterprise solutions. In the approval section, there should be an option to reassign approval to some other employee. It would be good if we are able to create custom tables by linking to an item, and there is an integration with the HTML table through HTTP calls or Swagger connectors."

"These products have some limitations, such as the need to build some custom controls in PCF or use the JSON format."

"Their connector to Oracle or premium data sets that aren't Microsoft would often fail for me. The information given back about why it failed wasn't always robust to understand how to fix it and why it happened."

"The tool should improve its price."

"They need to come up with a little more on AI and precision discovery path to be able to record the processes."

"Not suitable for connecting other applications like browsers and third party applications."

"It currently supports only on-premises deployments. They can include support for cloud deployments. It should provide us the ability to choose a robot for executing a workflow. We want to control which robot executes a certain workflow. Right now, it automatically chooses the robot that is going to execute our workflow. It should also provide the ability to get filters on the outputs of the steps. We have each workflow as a step, and each step has some output. We would like to have the functionality to execute some script or some logic on these outputs to format the tests directly on the variables."

"My company switched to a monthly payment for the WinAutomation by Softomotive license. I don't have the exact figure, but it roughly amounts to 500 Euros a year which isn't bad."

"It costs us nothing because we use it on the built-in cost that is a part of our existing license for 365. To use it more extensively, there are different pricing models. Its licensing is complex. It is complex to evaluate the cost in advance. As a result, people don't use it because they don't know what overall cost they are going to incur. There are too many criteria to figure out how much it is going to cost you to use the product to its full extent. Its licensing model should be improved, and the pricing should be more visible and transparent."

"It had by far the fairest licensing on the market. For the money, you got a very good value."

"We are just using the free products at the moment. We are using the ones that come with the license that we have got."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"You pay for use and if you want a premium connector or adapter, but a lot of things are available for free."

"This solution is reasonably priced and offers a free trial period."

"The free version is quite good."

"The pricing model is very straightforward. You can have a one-year or three-year subscription. You pay for each robot that you want to use simultaneously. If you want, you can install 50 robots and get 50 licenses. If you want to use only one robot at a time, you just need one license. For each license, you pay around 10% or 15% to support. You pay for the license, and you pay a small percentage of the cost of the license for support. This is their licensing model, which is very easy to understand."