Microsoft Power Automate vs Verint Robotic Process Automation comparison

"The templates on offer are very good."

"I use the product for automation."

"We use Power Automate for applicant tracking and automated around 80 percent of the process."

"AI Builder is a good add-on."

"Microsoft Power Automate is very easy to use."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"Instead of manually triggering payments through the website, everything was done through robotic process automation (RPA), saving us a lot of time."

"The email routing, consolidation of the reports, and management features are strong."

"Verint RPA gives our clients greater visibility into what's being done and how. It also lightens the load on the workers by automating tasks."

"When we create a support ticket on the Microsoft platform, it takes a good amount of time in certain cases, especially when we get stuck, and at that time, Microsoft's response can be much slower."

"Any task that is automated needs to be very simple. This tool does not seem to handle complicated tasks very well."

"I haven't used it with AI language models, and I think it may be restricted to work very friendly with Copilot, which could lead to further developments with other AI models or tools, thus suggesting some work is pending to do."

"We are looking to see more features implemented there are already available in UiPath or Automation Anywhere."

"For countries in our region, it's not very well known."

"There should be a comprehensive or enterprise level of application to provide the cognitive AI, and there should be orchestration so that I can control all the robots on one station. The other tools are currently providing these features."

"The solution could use some more advanced AI tools. It's one of the solution's only weaknesses."

"The licensing model is difficult to understand and is something that should be improved."

"Verint RPA needs a more robust toolset to create complex UIs for workers. It's probably not just this product. Almost all automation solutions have similar limitations."

"We've got a subscription package. We are on a monthly package of $40. We've got some discount because we're a big corporate client of Microsoft 365 and other solutions, but the standard price of the package that we use is $40. For the product, you don't have to pay anything extra. If you're using a partner, you need to pay for their coding, advice, and services, which is a separate cost. The majority of the features are available for free for anyone who is on Microsoft 365."

"Due to the pricing model, the solution is more convenient than any other tools."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is free for us. It is embedded directly in the Office package."

"It costs us nothing because we use it on the built-in cost that is a part of our existing license for 365. To use it more extensively, there are different pricing models. Its licensing is complex. It is complex to evaluate the cost in advance. As a result, people don't use it because they don't know what overall cost they are going to incur. There are too many criteria to figure out how much it is going to cost you to use the product to its full extent. Its licensing model should be improved, and the pricing should be more visible and transparent."

"Power Automate is comparatively less costly than UiPath."

"There should be increased transparency about which features attend the pricing."

"The free version is quite good."