Mimecast Incydr vs Teramind comparison

Mimecast and Teramind are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while Teramind is ranked #45. Mimecast holds a 2.4% mindshare in DLP, compared to Teramind’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution.

Mimecast Incydr

Read 78 Mimecast Incydr reviews

2,883 Views
1,384 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Teramind

Read 1 Teramind review

799 Views
312 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Mimecast Incydr

Teramind

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Mimecast Incydr and Teramind are products in the cybersecurity and employee monitoring space. Data suggests Teramind offers superior features, justifying its pricing relative to Mimecast Incydr.

Features: Mimecast Incydr focuses on data protection, offering file exposure detection, risk scoring, and robust data security measures. Teramind provides a comprehensive activity monitoring suite, including video playback, application use tracking, and behavior analytics, offering more granular insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast Incydr is generally cloud-based, simplifying deployment and requiring fewer infrastructure demands. Teramind offers flexible deployment options, including both on-premises and cloud-based solutions. Teramind's customer service is noted for thorough onboarding assistance, whereas Mimecast Incydr’s simplified deployment demands less technical support, suiting organizations with limited IT resources.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast Incydr provides a competitive pricing model, focusing on value from streamlined data protection benefits. Teramind’s pricing reflects its advanced monitoring capabilities, promising a strong ROI for businesses needing detailed oversight and compliance. Organizations focused on rigorous monitoring may find Teramind's higher investment crucial for maximizing security ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Incydr

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teramind

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

45th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (6th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Incydr is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teramind is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Mimecast Incydr	2.4%
Teramind	0.6%
Other	97.0%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Dinesh Kaarthik

Technical Support Executive at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited

A stable solution that provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console

If a person wants to use a DLP product, they must know what data they want to protect and how to block, allow, and monitor data. We will not have any issues if the policies are correct and the user is authorized to perform the actions. Uninstalling is also pretty quick. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"

"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."

"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."

"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

"The product provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console."

Cons

"Java, please get rid of Java."

"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."

"What I think could be improved is how I get support."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

"The user experience should be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

Security Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 7% of the time

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Dtex Systems vs Teramind

Compared 27% of the time

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management vs Teramind

Compared 15% of the time

DTEX InTERCEPT vs Teramind

Compared 10% of the time

Veriato User Activity Monitoring (UAM) vs Teramind

Compared 10% of the time

Exabeam vs Teramind

Compared 6% of the time

More Teramind Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr

January 2026

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

January 2026

Download Teramind product report

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Teramind provides a user-centric security approach to monitor employee behavior. Our software streamlines employee data collection in order to identify suspicious activity, detect possible threats, monitor employee efficiency, and ensure industry compliance. We help reduce security incidents by providing real-time access to user activities by offering alerts, warnings, redirects and user lock-outs to keep your business running as efficiently and secure as possible. We offer both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options to meet your organization’s requirements.

Teramind

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Government, Healthcare, Finance, Retails, Energy, Utilities and more. Example: Orange, Holiday Inn, Azteca

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.