Mimecast Incydr vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) comparison

Mimecast and Netskope are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while Netskope is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.8. Mimecast holds a 2.4% mindshare in DLP, compared to Netskope’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Netskope users who would recommend it.

Mimecast Incydr

Read 78 Mimecast Incydr reviews

2,883 Views
1,384 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Netskope Data Loss Preventi...

Read 5 Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews

1,512 Views
1,512 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Mimecast Incydr

Netskope Data Loss Preventi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Mimecast Incydr and Netskope Data Loss Prevention compete in data protection. Mimecast Incydr is preferred for efficient support and cost-effective pricing, while Netskope DLP is noted for its comprehensive feature set, justifying the investment.

Features: Mimecast Incydr offers proactive threat detection, comprehensive data backup and recovery, and seamless integration. Netskope DLP provides advanced context-aware data analysis, extensive integration capabilities, and deep data visibility and control.

Room for Improvement: Mimecast Incydr could improve in areas such as enhancing integration with other platforms, offering more intuitive user interfaces, and expanding customization options. Netskope DLP may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving real-time analytics, and enhancing support for non-Windows platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast Incydr offers straightforward deployment with effective customer service, enhancing the user experience. Netskope DLP's cloud-native model provides flexibility but requires more extensive setup due to feature density.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast Incydr offers accessible setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations, and delivers a reliable ROI. Netskope DLP requires a higher initial investment but promises superior ROI for businesses needing nuanced data management.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Incydr

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Netskope Data Loss Preventi...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Incydr is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is 2.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	2.7%
Mimecast Incydr	2.4%
Other	94.9%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

reviewer1595751

Information Security Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has improved sensitive data detection while requiring better support for data-at-rest scanning and classification

Data in transit works quite well and operates in near real-time. However, data at rest scanning operates under separate licensing, and it would be beneficial to examine applications where the location of sensitive data is unknown. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) could improve data-at-rest scanning capabilities. Regarding DLP-specific improvements, data-at-rest scanning could be enhanced in terms of the applications supported, as coverage is currently limited to a restricted set of enterprise applications. Expanding application coverage would be beneficial. Additionally, data-at-rest scans should be made easier and faster to execute. Most solutions lack Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) functionality, and this capability is not yet mature. A significant limitation is that Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) does not support out-of-the-box data classification. Third-party integrations must be relied upon instead, whereas having built-in data classification support would be advantageous.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."

"Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer."

"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."

"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."

"The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable."

"Low system overhead, setting retention policies, ease of use"

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

"The Real-Time Analytics and Reporting capabilities of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) are good and up to the mark."

"I find Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) easier and more appealing than Zscaler."

"The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access."

"The product is flexible."

"Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides predefined templates, indexed data matching, EDM, and OCR capabilities, and the role functionality provides significant information, and considerable automation has been built on top of the platform using the available APIs."

Cons

"Java, please get rid of Java."

"I think one we can improve is the compression."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."

"The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."

"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD)."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

"I have not seen any benefits from this real-time analysis at this time."

"The product should be compatible with multiple file formats."

"Technical support has been rated low. Numerous bugs have been discovered in terms of functionality, and the support team takes considerable time to resolve these issues."

"Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can be improved primarily because we were looking for any other provider due to the ZTNA feature that we were scoping from Netskope."

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The pricing is moderate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"The pricing is moderate."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is being used as a Secure Services Engine (SSE) solution for the CASB solution, Shadow IT detection, and Secure Web Gateway capabilities. The primary focus is on...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Remediation involves blocking specific communications when users attempt to upload sensitive information. Users should be provided with an interface to request exceptions in real-time for business-...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 7% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 13% of the time

Cyera vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 10% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 5% of the time

More Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr

January 2026

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Buyer's Guide

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) product report

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers advanced protection against sensitive data loss with robust features tailored for enterprise security needs, providing seamless integration and efficiency in monitoring data across cloud platforms.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps organizations safeguard their sensitive information by providing comprehensive data visibility and control. It addresses key needs such as compliance and IT security with its contextual understanding of data movements. It delivers flexible policy creation, which enhances data protection across all digital touchpoints. Adaptive machine learning capabilities allow precise identification and prevention of data leaks, ensuring that enterprises can confidently protect their data in real-time. The tool is highly regarded for its integration capabilities, though some users seek improvements in analytics and reporting functionalities.

What are the most important features of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Advanced Threat Protection: Guards against unauthorized data exfiltration.
Granular Control: Offers precise policy enforcement based on content and context.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly embeds into cloud services enhancing data security.
Customizable Policies: Enables tailored approaches to data protection rules.
Machine Learning: Utilizes AI for improved identification of sensitive data.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Enhanced Compliance: Assists in adhering to data protection regulations.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces data breach-related expenses through proactive measures.
Risk Management: Identifies vulnerabilities and mitigates risks effectively.
Data Visibility: Provides clear insights into data flows and storage locations.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is deployed across industries like healthcare, finance, and technology. In healthcare, it ensures patient data protection, supporting HIPAA compliance. Finance organizations benefit from its rigorous security controls for safeguarding financial records. For technology companies, it secures intellectual property against unauthorized access and leakage.

Netskope

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

December 2025

Free Report: Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.