Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) comparison

Microsoft and Netskope are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while Netskope is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 6.1% mindshare in DLP, compared to Netskope’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Netskope users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Netskope Data Loss Prevention are competing solutions in data security. Microsoft Purview has strengths in pricing and support, while Netskope is recognized for its robust feature set.

Features: Microsoft Purview offers seamless integration with Microsoft 365 tools, providing an intuitive experience for monitoring and controlling data flow. It supports efficient data management within the Microsoft ecosystem. Netskope provides comprehensive cloud coverage, advanced data inspection capabilities, and supports a broader range of environments, making it suitable for diverse cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview benefits from simplified deployment within Microsoft environments and responsive customer service. Netskope offers a flexible deployment model, favorable for multi-cloud setups, and provides robust support for various cloud applications.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview is generally more cost-effective for enterprises using Microsoft platforms, offering a competitive ROI with seamless integration and low setup costs. Netskope involves higher initial setup costs but provides superior ROI for businesses requiring extensive cloud security coverage, justifying its investment with versatile capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is 6.1%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is 2.1%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	6.1%
Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	2.1%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Other	89.8%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Rohit Jaiswar

Soc Anaylst at Softcell Technologies Limited

Integrated controls have reduced insider risk and now protect sensitive data across our workforce

One standout feature about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is the tight integration with Insider Risk Management and Defender XDR, as it gives much better context during investigations instead of treating DLP as an isolated alerting tool. We also use endpoint DLP heavily to control USB, copy, print, clipboard, and browser upload activity, which has been very effective for remote workforce security. The best features Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention offers include real-time policy enforcement, endpoint DLP, and deep integration with Microsoft 365 plus Defender XDR. We also heavily rely on sensitive information type detection, adaptive policy tips, and insider risk integration to investigate suspicious user behavior with proper context. Another standout feature is the ability to control USB copy, browser uploads, print clipboards, and cloud sharing actions directly from endpoint policies. The integration with Microsoft Defender 365 and Defender XDR helps our team in day-to-day operations because DLP alerts are automatically correlated with endpoint identity, email, and user activity telemetry, which helps the SOC investigate incidents much faster from a single workflow. The sensitive information type detection makes a difference compared to other tools we have used because it is more effective than many legacy DLP tools. It understands context, exact data patterns, document labeling, and Microsoft 365 native content, reducing false positives while improving detection accuracy. Another strong feature of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is auto-labeling and policy inheritance with Microsoft's Information Protection, which helps maintain protection even after files are shared or moved across workloads. We also value the user coaching or policy tip capability because it educates users in real time instead of only blocking actions, which reduces repeated DLP violations significantly.

Read full review

reviewer1595751

Information Security Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has improved sensitive data detection while requiring better support for data-at-rest scanning and classification

Data in transit works quite well and operates in near real-time. However, data at rest scanning operates under separate licensing, and it would be beneficial to examine applications where the location of sensitive data is unknown. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) could improve data-at-rest scanning capabilities. Regarding DLP-specific improvements, data-at-rest scanning could be enhanced in terms of the applications supported, as coverage is currently limited to a restricted set of enterprise applications. Expanding application coverage would be beneficial. Additionally, data-at-rest scans should be made easier and faster to execute. Most solutions lack Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) functionality, and this capability is not yet mature. A significant limitation is that Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) does not support out-of-the-box data classification. Third-party integrations must be relied upon instead, whereas having built-in data classification support would be advantageous.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Clover is the best product globally."

"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."

"I'm very satisfied with the environment and the dashboard."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."

"Cloudflare Access is part of the Zero Trust philosophy."

"It is a stable solution."

"The capabilities of the software are strong enough for me to do what it's supposed to do. For me, we don't need to do a lot of configuration on our site. We just enable it and monitor it."

More Cloudflare One pros

"If we can prevent information from going out, eventually, when a regulator is asking about our security measures, we can show what we've been doing."

"The impact of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's classification and policy controls on our productivity within our organization is significant, as it's helped our security team."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention has absolutely helped improve my organization's ability to manage data because we use M365 for the majority of our knowledge worker storage, and that's where people's data lives."

"One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention prevents users from sharing sensitive information outside the organization based on the configurations that we've implemented."

"Microsoft Purview has helped improve my company's ability to discover sensitive data, as most companies would say that they improved in the whole posture on this field."

"Because everything is on Microsoft and we use Azure, integration with the product is easier. That's the most important thing when you use many Microsoft products. It's easier to integrate everything in one place."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information is valuable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros

"Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides predefined templates, indexed data matching, EDM, and OCR capabilities, and the role functionality provides significant information, and considerable automation has been built on top of the platform using the available APIs."

"The product is flexible."

"The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access."

"I find Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) easier and more appealing than Zscaler."

"The Real-Time Analytics and Reporting capabilities of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) are good and up to the mark."

Cons

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."

"The onboarding process can be improved a little bit."

"I would like them to include a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"Cloudflare One is not very powerful, but for what we require, it is basic and sufficient."

"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."

"The response time for support must be reduced."

More Cloudflare One cons

"There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful."

"The AI advancements can improve the false positives."

"They do not provide language options beyond the ones already available, so our language option is missing."

"Improving Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention would involve recognizing that the whole AI path we are all on is going to help, given the massive amount of data we handle; even if there are true positives, implementing a degree of severity ranking is essential."

"The main disadvantages of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention in comparison to the Netscope product are notable considerations."

"There is a need for improvements, particularly in ensuring that file-based recognition is more reliable and comprehensive."

"The major challenge we had was overreach. When our initial design inception blocked more data than we expected, we had a lot of help desk related issues that we did not see in testing."

"All the security operations are better defined in Forcepoint, while in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, you will have to use a specific workflow and then an application to release blocked emails."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention cons

"I have not seen any benefits from this real-time analysis at this time."

"Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) can be improved primarily because we were looking for any other provider due to the ZTNA feature that we were scoping from Netskope."

"The product should be compatible with multiple file formats."

"Technical support has been rated low. Numerous bugs have been discovered in terms of functionality, and the support team takes considerable time to resolve these issues."

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The pricing is moderate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"Though I am not a specialist, the tool is quite expensive."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."

"We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is moderate."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

The pricing for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention was manageable for us because we already had Microsoft 365 and...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention can be improved as the endpoint DLP policy tuning can be complex in large envi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used for monitoring and preventing sensitive data exfiltration across Excha...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Data in transit works quite well and operates in near real-time. However, data at rest scanning operates under separa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is being used as a Secure Services Engine (SSE) solution for the CASB solution, S...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Remediation involves blocking specific communications when users attempt to upload sensitive information. Users shoul...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 11% of the time

Cyera vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 11% of the time

Next DLP vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 9% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 5% of the time

BigID Next vs Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Compared 4% of the time

More Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

August 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

July 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention helps businesses protect sensitive data through robust compliance automation and seamless multi-platform integration, supporting environments like Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, and macOS.

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on identifying sensitive data and maintaining compliance through automation and integration with platforms such as Exchange email, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. Auto-labeling, classification controls, and monitoring capabilities ensure secure data management, reducing insider threat response times by 25%. While praised for its capabilities, improvements in system integration, endpoint handling, and incident management are needed. Licensing costs and limited language support pose challenges. Usability can be enhanced through interface updates and better documentation. OCR and scalability enhancements could improve policy propagation speed. More end-user training examples would be beneficial.

What are the key features?

Sensitive Data Identification: Detects confidential information across environments.
Compliance Automation: Streamlines regulatory requirements adherence.
Multi-Platform Integration: Supports Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, macOS seamlessly.
Auto-Labeling: Automatically categorizes sensitive data for protection.
Classification Controls: Provides robust data classification options.
Alerts and Monitoring: Enhances data security with proactive alerting.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Efficient Threat Response: Reduces insider threat response times by 25%.
Enhanced Data Governance: Simplifies managing data privacy and compliance.
Comprehensive Protection: Integrates with multiple platforms for wide coverage.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and legal, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is crucial for safeguarding sensitive information due to strict compliance demands. It automates data classification and policy configurations, preventing accidental data leakage and ensuring security protocols align with regulatory standards.

Microsoft

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers advanced protection against sensitive data loss with robust features tailored for enterprise security needs, providing seamless integration and efficiency in monitoring data across cloud platforms.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps organizations safeguard their sensitive information by providing comprehensive data visibility and control. It addresses key needs such as compliance and IT security with its contextual understanding of data movements. It delivers flexible policy creation, which enhances data protection across all digital touchpoints. Adaptive machine learning capabilities allow precise identification and prevention of data leaks, ensuring that enterprises can confidently protect their data in real-time. The tool is highly regarded for its integration capabilities, though some users seek improvements in analytics and reporting functionalities.

What are the most important features of Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Advanced Threat Protection: Guards against unauthorized data exfiltration.
Granular Control: Offers precise policy enforcement based on content and context.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly embeds into cloud services enhancing data security.
Customizable Policies: Enables tailored approaches to data protection rules.
Machine Learning: Utilizes AI for improved identification of sensitive data.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)?

Enhanced Compliance: Assists in adhering to data protection regulations.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces data breach-related expenses through proactive measures.
Risk Management: Identifies vulnerabilities and mitigates risks effectively.
Data Visibility: Provides clear insights into data flows and storage locations.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is deployed across industries like healthcare, finance, and technology. In healthcare, it ensures patient data protection, supporting HIPAA compliance. Finance organizations benefit from its rigorous security controls for safeguarding financial records. For technology companies, it secures intellectual property against unauthorized access and leakage.

Netskope

Sample Customers

23andMe

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

August 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.