Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform are competitors in the data security and compliance category. Microsoft Purview seems to have the upper hand with its deep integration in the Microsoft ecosystem, providing better compliance management and cost-effectiveness, especially for Microsoft 365 users.
Features: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention shines with its auto-labeling feature, allowing for efficient document handling across repositories like Outlook, Exchange, SharePoint, and OneDrive. Its robust integration with Azure, Dynamics, and Office 365 provides seamless compliance management. Additionally, Purview supports heterogeneous environments and offers presentations to educate users about sensitive data handling. Meanwhile, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers comprehensive security features such as DLP, SSL inspection, and CASB capabilities. It is particularly beneficial for cloud integrations and securing remote work environments.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention could enhance its user experience by introducing AI-driven wizards for label setup and improve third-party integration and endpoint functionality. There's also a need to bolster incident handling and customization options. Zscaler's Zero Trust Exchange Platform has limitations in covering non-web channels and could benefit from more granular policy management. It also needs to expand its machine learning capabilities, improve support and scalability, and offer more competitive pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention benefits from its integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, aiding deployment across public, hybrid, and private clouds, though support is sometimes inconsistent. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform offers similar deployment flexibility but requires improvement in configuration simplicity and support responsiveness. While both provide extensive documentation, Zscaler’s customer service is often seen as less satisfactory.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention offers cost-effective solutions, especially for those with Microsoft E5 licenses, making it an attractive option for existing Microsoft users. It is seen as reasonably priced for the features provided. On the other hand, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is considered expensive, with additional costs based on user count and certain features. Despite this, both solutions promise ROI through integrated functionalities and reduced necessity for multiple tools, though Microsoft's inclusion in broader packages offers better value within its ecosystem.
We save a lot of time for legal by using Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention when searching data for legal and HR and employee issues.
In these days of data breaches and data leakages that result in huge regulatory fines, we have not had any data breaches that could result in such fines.
The fact that we are not being fined is crucial.
When I see that I am trying to cut costs, for example, even when replacing Prisma, we have managed to save about over half a million dollars a year.
We don't have to purchase many components such as load balancers and proxy servers that were necessary in traditional setups.
I rate it a ten because they are very quick to respond and very quick to escalate if needed.
Once we got to the Microsoft engineers, the experience was great.
In terms of support, it's top-notch and always available to help us with any support issues we raise.
Sometimes, support takes time since the solution has some bugs that need fixing.
They have provided the numbers and contact supports, and it is almost immediate.
The policy working and detection technology need enhancements.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention scales well with the growing needs of our organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention scales effectively.
The only limitation I was mentioning is that it was unable to identify the sources of vulnerability, which they are going to embed by the mid of this year.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention as high.
The stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is great.
I assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention as quite good because I don't think it's ever gone down, unlike other parts of Azure.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is very stable.
Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic.
Implementing a degree of severity ranking is essential.
More guides, more examples, and more compliance frameworks such as NIST or even PCI compliance would be great.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform probably needs to be more efficient because scanning takes a lot of time.
They might be able to identify if something is missing with Zscaler.
In terms of pricing, I would say it's unlimited value because it's bundled in our A5 and E5 licensing situation.
The pricing for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is generally set; E5 is required, but it comes with all other products, so I would say it is fine.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very straightforward because we are all using E5 licenses, so we are covered.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is much, much cheaper when comparing price.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention prevents users from sharing sensitive information outside the organization based on the configurations that we've implemented.
Microsoft Purview has helped improve our organization's ability to discover sensitive data significantly as we use eDiscovery Purview, which is incredibly helpful.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention usually performs well, except for endpoint Data Loss Prevention, which may need improvements.
The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing.
We have excellent account management, smooth marketplace engagement, and processing in how my team or organization uses Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform.
Since we started using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, it has auto-configuration, and wherever we have deployed the auto-configuration, we have not encountered any problem.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | 8.3% |
| Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform | 4.4% |
| Other | 87.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.
What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?
What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
