MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs ScyllaDB comparison

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Read 12 ScyllaDB reviews

2,474 Views
2,449 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and ScyllaDB are competitors in the NoSQL database category. MongoDB seems to have the upper hand due to its strong community support, flexible deployment options, and cost-effectiveness.

Features: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is known for JSON-based flexible schema, enterprise integration, and reliable documentation, making it ideal for semi-structured data like healthcare data. It excels in scalability and offers cloud deployment options, fostering simplified data storage for developers. ScyllaDB is optimized for performance, utilizing C++ for speed and reliability, especially with time-series data, and supports massive data sets with built-in partitioning and high availability.

Room for Improvement: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced could improve integration with external tools, security measures, and hierarchical data support. Enhancements in documentation and search functionality are needed. ScyllaDB's documentation and transactional deletion efficiency need upgrades; query performance with large data volumes presents a challenge, and compatibility and support systems require development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced provides flexibility in deployment across hybrid, private, and public clouds, backed by a strong community and technical support for paid versions. However, on-premises deployment can be complex. ScyllaDB also offers cloud deployment but demands significant technical expertise and may not resolve support issues quickly compared to MongoDB’s vast community resources.

Pricing and ROI: MongoDB offers both a free open-source version and paid licenses that provide advanced features, making it cost-effective with significant ROI for small and large projects. ScyllaDB's enterprise version costs approximately $300,000 per year, offering robust support and fast issue resolution that enhance ROI despite high initial expenses. Both databases leverage community resources to offset some costs.

To learn more, read our detailed MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs. ScyllaDB Report (Updated: June 2026).

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs. ScyllaDB

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (4th)

ScyllaDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is 13.2%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScyllaDB is 6.2%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced	13.2%
ScyllaDB	6.2%
Other	80.6%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Fabien GOUINEAU

Architecte Cloud at Visiativ SA

Offers reliable engine for legacy needs but requires enhanced cost management and AI features

While MongoDB is a good product, it is also an expensive product for support, and its scalability is acceptable, but the big problem with MongoDB is the cost. For security in MongoDB, we work with encrypted databases by default, but we have not contracted the security options in our contract because it is too expensive, so we only implement encrypted databases without the security pack, which is very expensive for us; in security, we are at the first steps, just using encrypted databases. I think additional features needed in MongoDB include perhaps vector databases, as I think they are not supported right now.

Read full review

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Reliable data management with great reliability and performance

From a sales pitch standpoint, it needs to deliver on promises of better ROI and compaction. Additionally, ticketing and support systems could be improved due to the time it takes to get answers. There's also an issue with compatibility when attempting to switch back from the enterprise to the community version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MongoDB is relatively fast compared to relational databases."

"The most valuable feature is the geometric information done with GeoJSON."

"The installation is very easy to do and understand."

"One of the biggest benefits is the speed and flexibility of the documents, especially when it comes to modifications."

"We can define security rules at the database level or the cluster level to grant or deny access to particular users."

"The fact is all of our users are happy with the stability and quick response times our solutions have."

"The geospatial index feature is useful for dealing with latitude and longitude data."

"Opting for MongoDB could be beneficial, especially for storing large volumes of records, even for transient data."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pros

"ScyllaDB is fast and reliable. It has good performance."

"ScyllaDB allows fine-tuning of the table structure. Speed is probably the most critical factor because we perform a lot of heavy data ingestion. One of its core features is its ability to handle high volumes and maintain speed when accessing data. Additionally, high availability and partitioning are built-in features of ScyllaDB."

"Firstly, if I update something, it's most likely to finish within milliseconds."

"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."

"I like how fast it is to query data from the ScyllaDB node!"

"The product's most valuable features are efficiency and reliability."

"The documentation is good. It integrates easily with our existing data infrastructure."

"ScyllaDB is very fast, and I can use it for so many things."

More ScyllaDB pros

Cons

"Some of the solution's transaction capabilities can be improved."

"MongoDB is a very useful and convenient choice, but sometimes for more complex projects, there are certain niche requirements that appear, so using a different tool could be beneficial. It raises the complexity of the architecture, but it could be beneficial to the world, the features, the ease of the features which are being implemented."

"The performance could be faster."

"The scalability of the solution has room for improvement."

"MongoDB could improve by not having so many updates and different versions."

"MongoDB should not be used for reporting, analytics, or number-crunching tasks."

"Sometimes, the tool goes down temporarily. There are some stability issues in the product."

"I have found the solution difficult to operate as an administrator."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced cons

"Support and the availability of support need improvement. I would give them a six out of ten."

"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."

"Some of the regular commands in NoSQL do not work."

"The product needs to add more features and improve the response time of the support team."

"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."

"ScyllaDB needs to improve its handling of transactions."

"If you don't have the best computing resources, then it's not easy to set up. In such cases, we have to run ScyllaDB in developer mode."

"The documentation is not well established for new developers."

More ScyllaDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe that the licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"MongoDB is an open-source product."

"It's a community edition, so we do not pay anything."

"The product is affordable."

"MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive."

"There are different licenses available to be purchased, such as individual, premium, or enterprise."

"I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me."

"It is rather expensive."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pricing and cost advice

"It's free."

"It's a bit expensive."

"It is an expensive tool compared to its competitor."

"The paid version of ScyllaDB is not that expensive. The main advantage of the paid version is direct support from the ScyllaDB team, which can resolve issues faster—typically within a day, compared to two to three days with the free version. The paid version also offers better guidance and support, while the free version has good documentation and is more high-level. I’d rate their support team nine out of ten because of the quick responses from their community."

"I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	39

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

I think it depends on the provider. For example, on DigitalOcean, they have strict routing. You have to whitelist an IP address, or you risk getting DDoS. Then if you're going for the Atlas one tha...

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

I don't really have a deep dive into it, but I see that MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has RAG and Vertex support. However, we really didn't use it because I think one thing also is that Prisma, the O...

What is your primary use case for MongoDB?

A typical use case for MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is mostly for the database, storing our data.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Scylla?

From what I’ve seen (and experienced), ScyllaDB pricing is very dependent on how you deploy it, and that’s where most of the confusion comes from.

What needs improvement with Scylla?

What is your primary use case for Scylla?

We dump a lot of our data, such as every entry created with respect to when a user rides a scooter, every record gets updated to ScyllaDB. It is used as a single source of truth and it manages mass...

MongoDB Atlas vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

InfluxDB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Redis vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 4% of the time

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Competitors

Redis vs ScyllaDB

Compared 15% of the time

Cassandra vs ScyllaDB

Compared 11% of the time

Apache HBase vs ScyllaDB

Compared 7% of the time

Aerospike Database vs ScyllaDB

Compared 7% of the time

DataStax Enterprise vs ScyllaDB

Compared 7% of the time

More ScyllaDB Competitors

Product Reports

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

June 2026

Download MongoDB Enterprise Advanced product report

Download ScyllaDB product report

May 2026

Overview

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.

The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.

What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?

Scalability: Dynamic adjustments to workloads with ease.
JSON Compatibility: Seamless data structuring with JSON support.
Clustering: Enhanced data management through robust clustering.
Security Integration: Built-in security measures for data protection.
Sharding: Efficient distribution of large datasets.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Document-Based Storage: Flexibility in managing varied data types.
Open-Source: Access to a broad community and resources.
Low-Cost Implementation: Economic efficiency in deployment.
Scalability: Supports the growth of data without sacrificing performance.

Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.

MongoDB

ScyllaDB is known for its remarkable speed, efficiency, and reliability. It operates with minimal resources, supports large data volumes, and allows for meticulous fine-tuning. Enhanced by Seastar, it offers a performance edge over Cassandra and prioritizes ease of use with robust data synchronization.

ScyllaDB stands out for its capability in high-volume data handling, making it ideal for distributed systems. It integrates easily with APIs and supports user-defined types, providing flexibility through Cassandra SDK and DynamoDB. High availability, effective partitioning, easy updates, and rapid query responses enhance its appeal for organizations dealing with real-time analytics and time-series data management. However, users have noted the complexity in setup compared to MongoDB or Postgres and have highlighted the need for improvements in areas like data export, deletion processes, and documentation. There are also challenges with transactions, support response, compatibility, and AWS integration, with some requiring custom commands which may affect universality.

What are the key features of ScyllaDB?

Exceptional Speed: Achieves high performance through Seastar technology.
Efficiency: Consumes minimal computing resources while supporting substantial data volumes.
Reliability: Offers robust failover systems and data synchronization capabilities.
Flexible Integration: Supports APIs, user-defined types, Cassandra SDK, and DynamoDB.
High Availability: Ensures continuous access and effective partitioning.

Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Maximizes resource utilization with minimal expense.
Performance: Provides fast data querying crucial for real-time analytics.
Scalability: Easily manages large-scale and high-volume data needs.
Security: Ensures safe and secure data storage within distributed systems.

Industries like telecommunications, advertising, mobility services, and security implement ScyllaDB for managing extensive datasets and securing real-time data access. Its scalability and efficiency make it a preferred choice for data transformation services, harmonizing complex data flows with real-time analytics needs.

Sample Customers

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung