Couchbase Enterprise vs ScyllaDB comparison

Read 12 ScyllaDB reviews

1,964 Views
1,944 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Couchbase Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2025

Couchbase Enterprise and ScyllaDB compete in the high-performance database market. Couchbase seems to have the upper hand with its user-friendly integration and comprehensive features.

Features: Couchbase Enterprise offers horizontal scalability, versatile document and indexing, and a robust analytics engine that simplifies complex queries. Additionally, it integrates well with mobile through its dynamic API and Sync Gateway. ScyllaDB is known for its efficient performance, flexibility with the Cassandra SDK, and a distributed architecture ideal for large deployments.

Room for Improvement: Couchbase Enterprise could improve its version upgrades, documentation, and integration options with third-party tools. Enhancements in Kubernetes management and replication reliability are also needed. ScyllaDB requires better documentation and a simpler setup process for inexperienced users, particularly in data modeling and deletion processing. Improvements in transaction handling and feature offerings are necessary.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Couchbase Enterprise supports public, private, hybrid clouds, and on-premises solutions with generally responsive customer support. ScyllaDB primarily focuses on hybrid and on-premises deployments, with supportive customer service considered responsive despite infrequent interactions.

Pricing and ROI: Couchbase Enterprise offers competitive pricing with flexible licensing, though integration needs can add costs. Users find ROI through reduced operational expenses and enhanced throughput. ScyllaDB is seen as more expensive, but its prompt support and performance capabilities deliver significant ROI, evidenced by cost-saving efficiencies and improved market speeds.

To learn more, read our detailed Couchbase Enterprise vs. ScyllaDB Report (Updated: September 2025).

Couchbase Enterprise vs. ScyllaDB

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Couchbase Enterprise

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScyllaDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Couchbase Enterprise is 8.5%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScyllaDB is 8.9%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ScyllaDB	8.9%
Couchbase Enterprise	8.5%
Other	82.6%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Ravi_Singh

Manager at Tesco

Supports multiple data models and offers AI capabilities

With some of the operations, we used to face some challenges with scalability. Although it worked pretty well, in some scenarios, we noticed issues where the replications and the sharding were not happening correctly. In recent versions, we also faced some issues in terms of enabling advanced operations like FTS and vectors. Although it works pretty well, in some places, we do face challenges, especially on a heavy scale. I think all issues are being addressed in the latest version of Couchbase. The resources are not that good for Couchbase. The tool's documentation is pretty extensive, but if you go for any kind of courses or tutorials, there are very limited resources available. It also becomes a little bit challenging for new people to get onboard into it. MongoDB and other such open-source database tools perform really well as they're really widely adopted, and they have resources available to get you onboarded pretty quickly. I think that we do face some challenges with Couchbase, but luckily, we have the tool's enterprise version solution, so we get all the support from the product team.

Read full review

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Reliable data management with great reliability and performance

From a sales pitch standpoint, it needs to deliver on promises of better ROI and compaction. Additionally, ticketing and support systems could be improved due to the time it takes to get answers. There's also an issue with compatibility when attempting to switch back from the enterprise to the community version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is highly available for support and does not impact our operations significantly during failures."

"The valuable features of Couchbase are the many documents and index types, and they made a lot of features available enabling us to use it as a complete solution for our needs."

"I rate Couchbase a nine out of ten."

"Couchbase was a stable solution for us."

"It can scale horizontally, and we are looking to expand our capacity."

"Couchbase has not given any performance problems as of now."

"The principal advantage of Couchbase is that we can have multiple database paradigms in the same product, without deploying multiple databases. We also like that it has lower latency, when compared to its competitor: Cassandra."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

More Couchbase Enterprise pros

"The database is easy to use, fast, and accessible for applications because the API is straightforward."

"The product's most valuable features are efficiency and reliability."

"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."

"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."

"ScyllaDB is fast and reliable. It has good performance."

"The documentation is good. It integrates easily with our existing data infrastructure."

"The best features of ScyllaDB are how it synchronizes data and its failover system. There's a unique formula to decide the number of nodes you need and the minimum required, which I find helpful. It also offers encryption and supports APIs, making it great for distributed systems and scaling databases across different regions. While it's easy to use, having prior experience helps configure it properly. There are many configurations; if you don't understand them, you might mess up the design. So, understanding your system's needs, like whether it requires more read or write operations, is crucial for setting up the correct configuration."

"ScyllaDB allows fine-tuning of the table structure. Speed is probably the most critical factor because we perform a lot of heavy data ingestion. One of its core features is its ability to handle high volumes and maintain speed when accessing data. Additionally, high availability and partitioning are built-in features of ScyllaDB."

More ScyllaDB pros

Cons

"Overall as a tool, I see room for improvement in Couchbase in certain aspects."

"I have tried multiple libraries in a demo they provide and it works fine, but when it merges with libraries, it creates a problem."

"There are some limitations to the database. The SQL database cannot handle real-time processing for critical IoT scenarios. What we have to do is store our data into the database then code it out, this wastes a lot of time."

"The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes."

"Although it worked pretty well, in some scenarios, we noticed issues where the replications and the sharding were not happening correctly."

"We would like to have a better management of Kubernetes with the free, open source version of Couchbase. We don't have any major complaints other than that."

"Couchbase needs to improve the consistent reliability of the replication feature. Sometimes, the replications would be delayed."

"It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version."

More Couchbase Enterprise cons

"We faced several challenges while integrating ScyllaDB into our AWS environment. One common issue was that a security port wasn’t opened on one node, preventingdata synchronization across clusters. We noticed the data wasn’t syncing correctly when we saw different record counts in other regions. After investigating, we found that the port was closed in one AWS region. Once we opened the port, the data synchronization across all nodes resumed as expected."

"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."

"ScyllaDB needs to improve its handling of transactions."

"It seems we have better options available. So probably don't go for ScyllaDB. The reason is, first, it's very high. It's not as straightforward as, like, Postgres or ClickHouse to set up. It requires a complex setup."

"The product needs to add more features and improve the response time of the support team."

"If you don't have the best computing resources, then it's not easy to set up. In such cases, we have to run ScyllaDB in developer mode."

"From a sales pitch standpoint, it needs to deliver on promises of better ROI and compaction."

"The documentation is not well established for new developers."

More ScyllaDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."

"It can range between 25,000 to 40,000 Euros per year depending on company requirements."

"We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."

"It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."

"The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."

"I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."

"It's free."

"It's a bit expensive."

"I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."

"The paid version of ScyllaDB is not that expensive. The main advantage of the paid version is direct support from the ScyllaDB team, which can resolve issues faster—typically within a day, compared to two to three days with the free version. The paid version also offers better guidance and support, while the free version has good documentation and is more high-level. I’d rate their support team nine out of ten because of the quick responses from their community."

"It is an expensive tool compared to its competitor."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Hospitality Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Couchbase?

The main issue we keep facing from the past couple of years, observing other teams using Couchbase, is that whenever there is an upgrade, we see many issues with compatibility or nodes not intercon...

What is your primary use case for Couchbase?

Basically we have clusters, Couchbase clusters, databases, and that is how we use Couchbase with XDCR. All the clusters are set up and then we use Couchbase. It is a complex application setup we us...

What advice do you have for others considering Couchbase?

It is a good solution, but as every product needs improvement, this also needs some enhancement. It is a good product. I rate Couchbase seven out of ten.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Scylla?

The enterprise version comes with a cost of about $300,000 per year, however, we did not experience the promised compaction benefits.

What needs improvement with Scylla?

What is your primary use case for Scylla?

We dump a lot of our data, such as every entry created with respect to when a user rides a scooter, every record gets updated to ScyllaDB. It is used as a single source of truth and it manages mass...

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Couchbase Enterprise

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

Cassandra vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 16% of the time

Redis vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Couchbase Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

More Couchbase Enterprise Competitors

Redis vs ScyllaDB

Compared 21% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs ScyllaDB

Compared 13% of the time

Aerospike Database 7 vs ScyllaDB

Compared 11% of the time

Cassandra vs ScyllaDB

Compared 11% of the time

Apache HBase vs ScyllaDB

Compared 9% of the time

More ScyllaDB Competitors

Product Reports

Couchbase Enterprise

Download Couchbase Enterprise product report

Download ScyllaDB product report

Overview

Couchbase Enterprise offers powerful data management capabilities with features like horizontal scalability, ease of use, and flexible tools for business applications. Designed for high performance and reliability, it supports multi-master capability and low latency, making it ideal for dynamic environments.

Designed for businesses needing crucial data management, Couchbase Enterprise offers advanced indexing, analytics engines, and efficient storage for performance enhancement. It provides flexibility with data types, robust data sync, and supports a dynamic API for seamless integration. Its intuitive query language simplifies operations, ensuring businesses navigate effortlessly while enjoying high availability and extensive features. Despite this, challenges exist in areas like manual failover processes, complex upgrades, and UI limitations, necessitating enhancements in concurrency, integration, and security features. Performance issues on certain platforms add to the need for improved documentation and support.

What are Couchbase Enterprise’s most important features?

Horizontal Scalability: Allows easy scaling across different servers to handle large data volumes.
Advanced Analytics Engine: Drives insightful business decisions by processing complex data rapidly.
Efficient Data Storage: Enhances system performance by optimizing data organization and retrieval.
Multi-Master Capability: Ensures data consistency and reliability across several nodes.
Dynamic API Integration: Facilitates seamless integration with other applications for extended functionality.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Performance Efficiency: Low latency capabilities ensure smooth operations for business applications.
High Availability: Robust infrastructure supports uninterrupted service and minimal downtime.
Data Flexibility: Supports diverse data types, enhancing adaptability to business needs.
Real-Time Data Replication: Ensures timely data updates across multiple platforms, enhancing workflow.
Reliable Customer Support: Provides technical assistance, improving user experience and system utilization.

Couchbase Enterprise is deployed across industries for its excellent data handling capabilities. It empowers telemedicine, e-commerce, gaming, and telecommunications sectors by offering efficient data link utilization, caching, and logging. Some companies leverage its real-time data replication with Elasticsearch for high-performance operational needs, while others benefit from its capabilities in managing reads and writes in iGaming. Retail industries use its document-based storage for structured inventory management, and cloud migrations are simplified with support from Capella.

Couchbase

ScyllaDB is an open-source, distributed NoSQL wide-column datastore (a highly scalable NoSQL database), known for its compatibility with Apache Cassandra, and for supporting the same protocols as Cassandra (CQL and Thrift) and the same file formats (SSTable). ScyllaDB is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for data-intensive applications. Its architecture allows it to deliver remarkable performance on a massive scale, utilizing modern multi-core servers to their fullest potential

ScyllaDB utilizes a similar architecture, data format, and query language as Apache Cassandra, providing compatibility while dramatically improving speed and scalability.

The key advantages of ScyllaDB include its rewritten C++ implementation that eliminates Cassandra's expensive Java garbage collection pauses, built-in caching for fast access to frequently used data, and shard-aware drivers for direct routing of requests. This enables it to fully leverage modern multi-core servers for massive parallelism. The community is active and the latest major release, ScyllaDB Enterprise 2023.1.0 LTS, incorporates over 5,000 code commits focused on enhancing capabilities.

ScyllaDB supports wide-column data modeling for fast read performance at scale. It includes integrated monitoring and management tools to track database health and performance. For organizations looking to boost speed and reduce costs for NoSQL workloads, ScyllaDB offers a drop-in replacement for Cassandra that delivers lower latency, higher throughput, and increased scalability with fewer nodes. Its seamless migration path makes switching from Cassandra seamless, requiring minimal code changes.

Sample Customers

Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE

IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung

Couchbase Enterprise vs. ScyllaDB