Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ScyllaDB based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Redis, MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, and InfluxDB.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
ScyllaDB Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ScyllaDB, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
ScyllaDB offers high-performance scalability and cost-effectiveness, ideal for large datasets with low latency needs. In comparison, Redis excels in caching and real-time analytics with extensive in-memory data structures, appealing to performance-focused businesses despite higher costs. Each provides unique advantages for tech buyers.
ScyllaDB offers competitive setup costs with a focus on cost efficiency, whereas Redis features higher initial costs due to its premium support and advanced features.
ScyllaDB offers competitive setup costs with a focus on cost efficiency, whereas Redis features higher initial costs due to its premium support and advanced features.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced excels with flexibility and ease of development, ideal for secure, scalable applications like FHIR. In comparison, ScyllaDB prioritizes high-speed data querying and scalability, making it perfect for intensive, real-time analytics and handling large data loads efficiently.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has a higher setup cost than ScyllaDB, which may influence budget considerations. Meanwhile, ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective setup, potentially making it more attractive for cost-conscious organizations.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has a higher setup cost than ScyllaDB, which may influence budget considerations. Meanwhile, ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective setup, potentially making it more attractive for cost-conscious organizations.
InfluxDB handles time-series data efficiently with low setup costs and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, ScyllaDB excels in scalability and performance for high-throughput applications, offering flexible deployment and comprehensive service options, despite its higher price, making it ideal for data-intensive environments requiring robust performance.
InfluxDB has upfront setup costs that are generally higher, whereas ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two databases.
InfluxDB has upfront setup costs that are generally higher, whereas ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective initial setup option, highlighting a significant difference in pricing structure between the two databases.
Cassandra is valued for its expansive community support and cost-effectiveness, ideal for organizations focused on scalability. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high throughput and low latency, attracting tech buyers with its modern architecture and potential for efficient resource utilization and reduced ongoing costs.
Couchbase Enterprise's extensive feature set and integration ease attract tech buyers seeking advanced query capabilities. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers efficiency with time series data and performance optimization, appealing to those prioritizing speed and reliable data distribution.
Couchbase Enterprise typically incurs higher setup costs, reflecting its robust features and scalability, while ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to those prioritizing lower initial investment.
Couchbase Enterprise typically incurs higher setup costs, reflecting its robust features and scalability, while ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to those prioritizing lower initial investment.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop provides comprehensive features with strong cluster management and enterprise security, ideal for large-scale environments. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high-speed data handling and resource efficiency, appealing to those prioritizing performance and cost-effectiveness in data management solutions.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers a more flexible setup cost, while ScyllaDB presents a simpler pricing model. The differences highlight Cloudera's scalable approach versus ScyllaDB's straightforward implementation.
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop offers a more flexible setup cost, while ScyllaDB presents a simpler pricing model. The differences highlight Cloudera's scalable approach versus ScyllaDB's straightforward implementation.
Neo4j specializes in graph-based models for complex relationship handling and social networks. In comparison, ScyllaDB offers high-speed NoSQL capabilities and massive scalability ideal for large-scale applications, suiting enterprises needing fast data retrieval and efficient customer service.
Neo4j Graph Database generally has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, which is often considered more budget-friendly for initial implementation.
Neo4j Graph Database generally has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, which is often considered more budget-friendly for initial implementation.
Apache HBase excels in scalability and its integration with Hadoop, making it ideal for growing data needs. In comparison, ScyllaDB focuses on low-latency performance with high throughput, offering significant ROI through efficient resource use and rapid data retrieval capabilities.
DataStax Enterprise is ideal for enterprises seeking advanced features and robust support. In comparison, ScyllaDB appeals to organizations looking for performance and scalability benefits at a lower cost, making it attractive for those prioritizing speed and return on investment.
DataStax Enterprise requires a high initial setup cost, while ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective setup. These differences significantly impact budget considerations for enterprises evaluating both solutions.
DataStax Enterprise requires a high initial setup cost, while ScyllaDB offers a more cost-effective setup. These differences significantly impact budget considerations for enterprises evaluating both solutions.
Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.
Oracle NoSQL provides integration with Oracle's ecosystem and strong security, appealing to those prioritizing secure transactions. In comparison, ScyllaDB attracts buyers seeking high performance and low-latency, ideal for rapidly scaling data processing environments where speed is crucial.
Apache CouchDB is open source database software that focuses on ease of use and having a scalable architecture. It has a document-oriented NoSQL database architecture and is implemented in the concurrency-oriented language Erlang; it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API.
