MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Zapier comparison

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 41 Zapier reviews

658 Views
462 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Zapier compete in the integration and automation category. MuleSoft seems to have the upper hand for enterprises needing comprehensive API management and robust hybrid integration solutions, while Zapier excels for simpler, code-free automation workflows.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers robust API management, hybrid integration capabilities, and a diverse range of connectors, providing a comprehensive toolkit for enterprise-grade solutions. It also features strong monitoring and API reusability. Zapier specializes in connecting disparate cloud applications through automated workflows, emphasizing ease of use, rapid setup of automation, and offering an extensive library of integrations.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft faces hurdles with pricing complexity, technical support responsiveness, and the need for faster release cycles. Users mention pricing as a barrier for smaller businesses and suggest enhancements in AI capabilities. Zapier requires improvements in handling complex business logic within Zaps, connection reliability, and faster support responses. Users frequently mention the need for better functionality in multi-step workflows and advanced decision-making capabilities.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform supports multiple deployment models such as public, private, and hybrid clouds, making it versatile for enterprise requirements. Customer service feedback is mixed, with some users noting slower response times. Zapier focuses on ease of deployment primarily in the public cloud, with users citing positive experiences with their proactive support team, though advanced API integrations can pose complexity.

Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is considered expensive with a complex pricing model, potentially deterring smaller organizations. Larger enterprises likely see significant ROI due to its robust integration capabilities. Zapier offers a more accessible pricing structure with a free plan for basic needs and flexible paid plans appealing to startups and small to medium businesses. While costs may increase with complex tasks, most users find the pricing justifiable due to time savings and functionality provided.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Zapier Report (Updated: April 2025).

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Zapier

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 852,780 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Zapier

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 6.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zapier is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vijay Subramanyam

Delivery Head at cblsolutions

Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten; it is a highly scalable solution. We have around 200 end users using this solution in our company. We use it to its maximum capacity. However, it's not for P1 applications, but definitely for severity two cases (P2 level). It integrates critical applications, but it's not a platform that, if it stops, the entire system would come down. So, it's more like a severity two level. However, it has the potential to eventually become a P1 platform. Not exactly P1 applications, but a P1 platform. Because now we are still in the transition to migrate everything, all the integrations to Mule Anypoint Platform. But once it's done, then this platform becomes critical. Because even now, we have point-to-point connections.

Read full review

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

Though the tool offers a visually appealing UI, it needs to improve its documentation

With Zapier, improvements are required in the areas of concerns like bugs, ease of use, and documentation. The product has many bugs, so users have to wait for a period ranging from five minutes to an hour to see where the Zap went. In Zapier, Zaps aren't very understandable owing to the way they work. As a user, you would think that in Zapier, a Zap works in a particular way once you set it up, but it won't happen. At times, some Zaps can interfere with each other, because of which there might be infinite loops that may occur, owing to which multiple Zaps continue to run or break down in general, after which nothing would run in your environment. You would not be notified about the breakdown of Zaps. The bugs in the product may be considered to understand or get an explanation of how Zaps works between software systems, so for something between Gmail and HubSpot, Zapier would explain through better documentation what would work and what wouldn't work. Maybe if Zapier had better functionality with Python or any other coding language in general, it would make the product a lot better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."

"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."

"We use simple queues and exchanges to route messages to multiple queues. The publish/subscribe model is also helpful."

"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."

"The tool's visual features are attractive."

"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."

"Initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment is a cakewalk."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."

"There are a few valuable features, like the stability that it comes with and also the number of features that it offers. I've used other services like Pabbly, but they don't offer similar numbers of applications that Zapier has or allows to integrate with – it's maximum."

"The product's most valuable feature is automation."

"With the previous CRM we were using – the Google Ads landing pages we had – we were collecting leads manually. That process was not efficient and took a sales team a lot of time to insert these leads manually. Currently, the process is smooth and we use Zapier to collect the leads for us."

"The most valuable feature of Zapier is it saves me time doing repetitive tasks."

"Zapier luckily has a wide range of integrations, I would say."

"Webhooks are the most valuable feature of Zapier."

"The ability to connect web applications to trigger actions in another app after having enriched, formatted, delayed, grouped, and filtered is really valuable for many businesses."

More Zapier pros

Cons

"The solution's licensing model is expensive and could be improved."

"I would like to see some data integration and automation."

"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."

"Mule Anypoint Platform should improve its pricing. In my experience, a customer using the sandbox version couldn't upgrade to the final version because it exceeded their budget. Another area for improvement is the login mechanism. We need to integrate with third-party products for strong authentication, but it would be better if MuleSoft had its own robust login mechanism."

"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."

"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"Being able to share Zaps and organize them with teammates would allow sharing and refining scenarios and even combining steps that require different people's credentials."

"After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail."

"The pricing could be a little cheaper."

"I think that this solution should have more apps connected to it."

"The user interface for Zapier could be improved. It also takes some time to sync the data between different environments."

"It could support various languages along with Python."

"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."

"There is room for improvement in the support. They are not responsive, and they don't take much time to get resolved."

More Zapier cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Mule Anypoint Platform pricing is slightly higher compared to Dell Boomi."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"I can't give you a straightforward answer because sometimes it depends on the usage. If you're going to have fewer than 5 million messages, it is free of cost. If you're going to have more than 5 million messages, they're going to charge $100 per month"

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing as four or five out of ten."

"The product comes complete at one set price including support."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"Think your Zaps through to make sure you don't use more Zaps than you need."

"It's very straightforward licensing. There's only one cost you have to pay, and if you want a relevant pricing plan, I think you have two or three different models or packages which include the number of notifications or Zaps, as they call it, that you can program."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The price of Zapier is approximately $75 monthly."

"Zapier is a paid service. Its license renews monthly, and Zapier will downgrade your subscription to the free version when your credit card doesn't have funds. That significantly impacts your service because everything halts completely. Zapier doesn't have any hidden costs."

"The least expensive plan is $24 a month, and you can go all the way to $800 a month if you're a huge company using many tasks."

"There is a free plan that is, of course, limited. However, it allows you to understand and check true scenarios for a while."

"Per task, there is a monthly plan involving 15 euros...Also, in different forms, they just give you the ability to use different features. They charge 18.58 euros for the first standard plan, which includes 750 tasks. So, it is about 25 cents per task."

More Zapier pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

852,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

What do you like most about Zapier?

The product's most valuable feature is automation.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zapier?

The pricing is suitable. It's not cheap, but not expensive.

What needs improvement with Zapier?

The pricing could be a little cheaper.

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Coefficient vs Zapier

Compared 21% of the time

Fivetran vs Zapier

Compared 13% of the time

SnapLogic vs Zapier

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Glue vs Zapier

Compared 10% of the time

Coupler.io vs Zapier

Compared 9% of the time

More Zapier Competitors

Product Reports

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

May 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Download Zapier product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

No data available

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

Zapier is a tool for primarily non-technical users to connect together web apps.

An integration between two apps is called a Zap. A Zap is made up of a Trigger and one or more Actions or Searches.

Whenever the trigger happens in one app, Zapier will automatically perform the actions or searches in another app in order.

Zaps are very lightweight and easy to set up. Zaps do not import or export old data (they only operate on new items created after the Zap is enabled). Zaps are also not kept in sync ("two way syncing") after the Zap is triggered.

Zaps are deceivingly simple if you're used to dealing with complex and difficult integrations. Their simplicity is what enables anyone to create them.

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

BuzzFeed, Groupon, Spotify, Columbia University, FOX